With strong connection to schoolwide policy and vision and to the realities of the daily life of teachers and students, the department chair is uniquely positioned to play an important role in advancing instructional effectiveness (Printy, 2008; Weller, 2001). This article provides an in-depth look at the efforts of three urban comprehensive high schools to revision the role of department chair as instructional leader. The case studies identify building a shared vision, trust, role clarity, professional development, modeling, and application as critical elements of leadership development. The article defines the role of department chair as instructional leader and examines the effects of efforts to strengthen this role. Findings suggest that department chairs found their new role to be motivating and enriching, but significant training and reshaping of school norms were needed to provide the skills and legitimacy for them to lead instructional improvement in their departments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdduciL. (1990). The department chair: Role ambiguity and role strain.Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.
2.
BarnettD., & AagaardL. (2007). Developing leadership capacity within the teaching ranks: One district's approach. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 11(9).
3.
BarthR. S. (2007). The Teacher Leader. In AckermanR. H., and MackenzieS. V. (Eds.), Uncovering Teacher Leadership: Essays and Voices from the Field, pp. 9–36. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
4.
BlissT., FahrneyC., & SteffyB. (1995). Secondary department chair roles: Ambiguity and change in systemic reform (UKERA Occasional Paper No. 0010). Lexington: University of Kentucky, Institute on Education Reform.
5.
BasitT. N. (2010). Conducting Research in Educational Contexts.New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
6.
BredesonP. V. (1993). Letting go of out-lived professional identities: A study of role transition and role strain in restructured schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(1), 34–68.
7.
BredesonP. V. (2013). Distributed instructional leadership in urban high schools: Transforming the work of principals and department chairs through professional development. Journal of School Leadership, 23(2), 362–385.
8.
BrownM., & RutherfordD. (1999). A re-appraisal of the role of the head of department in UK secondary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 37(3), 229–242.
9.
CrowtherF. (2009). Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
10.
GlaserB. G., and StraussA. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.Chicago: Aldine Transaction Publishers.
11.
HannayL., & DenbyM. (1994, April). Secondary school change: The role of department heads. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
12.
HarrisA. (2001). Department improvement and school improvement: A missing link?British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 477–486.
13.
HarrisA. (2003a). Introduction. In HarrisA., DayC., HadfieldM., HopkinsD., HargreavesA., & ChapmanC., Effective leadership for school improvement (pp. 1–6). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
14.
HarrisA. (2003b). Teacher leadership and school improvement. In HarrisA., DayC., HadfieldM., HopkinsD., HargreavesA., & ChapmanC., Effective leadership for school improvement (pp. 72–83). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
15.
HillD. (1995). The strong department: Building the department as a learning community. In SiskinL., & LittleJ. (Eds.), The subjects in question: Departmental organization and the high school (pp. 123–140). New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
HippK. K., & WeberP. (2008). Developing a professional learning community among urban school principals. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching and Research, 4, 46–56.
17.
KlarH. W. (2013). Principals fostering the instructional leadership capacities of department chairs: A strategy for urban high school reform. Journal of School Leadership, 23(2), 324–361.
18.
KoehlerM. (1993). Department Head's Survival Guide: Ready-to-Use Techniques and Materials for Effective Leadership.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
LambertL. (2003). Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
20.
LittleJ. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.
21.
LittleJ. W. (1995). Contested ground: The basis of teacher leadership in two restructuring high schools. Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 47–63.
22.
MarzanoR., WatersT., & McNultyB. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results.Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
23.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Table A-2.1b: Percentage distribution of public elementary and secondary school enrollment, by race/ethnicity and urbanicity. Fall 2002. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/
24.
NelsonB. S., StimpsonV. C., & JordanW. J. (2007, November). Leadership content knowledge for mathematics of staff engaged in key school leadership functions. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the University Council for Educational Administration, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www2.edc.org/cdT/docs/Papers/LeadershipRoleAnalysis.pdf
25.
NelsonM. (2004). The unsung heroes of school improvement: High school chairpersons take the lead. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
26.
PrintyS. (2008). Leadership for teacher learning: A community of practice perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 187.
27.
SchmidtM. (2000). Role theory, emotions, and identity in the department headship of secondary schooling. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(8), 827–842.
28.
SiskinL., & LittleJ. (1995). The subject department: Continuities and critiques. In SiskinL., & LittleJ. (Eds.), The subjects in question: Departmental organization and the high school (pp. 1–22). New York: Teachers College Press.
29.
SpillaneJ., HalversonR., & DiamondJ. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3–34.
30.
StakeR. E. (2006). Multiple Case Study Analysis.New York: Guilford Press.
31.
StraussA. L. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists.New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
WagemanR., NunesD. A., BurrussJ. A., & HackmanJ. R. (2008). Senior leadership teams: What it takes to make them great.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
33.
WellerL.Jr. (2001). Department heads: The most underutilized leadership position. NASSP Bulletin, 85(625), 73.
34.
WettersonJ. (1992, April). High school department chairs as instructional leaders: Four case studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
35.
WetterstenJ. (1994, April). Low profile, high impact: Four case studies of high school department chairs whose transactions “transform” teachers and administrators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Assocation, New Orleans, LA.
36.
York-BarrJ., & DukeK. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316.
37.
ZepedaS., & KruskampB. (2007). High school department chairs: Perspectives on instructional supervision. High School Journal, 90(4), 11.
