The purpose of this qualitative research study was to understand the experience of graduate students in an educational leadership program as they began to apply leadership for social justice theory through the process of action research. This study used critical race theory to explore dimensions of race, power, and privilege. Findings from focus groups with 12 graduate students reveal that relationships influence the path of becoming a leader for social justice as well as their ability to engage in change on their campus. While the importance of relationships was found across all participants, several themes were unique to the emerging leaders of color. Recommendations for leadership preparation include the need to honor personal and professional experiences of students, supporting community leadership development, and highlighting the unique experiences and needs of emerging leaders of color.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlemánE.Jr. (2006). Is Robin Hood the “Prince of Thieves” or a pathway to equity? Applying critical race theory to school finance political discourse. Education Policy, 20(1), 113–142.
2.
BellD. (1993). Faces at the bottom of the well: The permanence of racism.New York: Basic Books.
3.
BrownK. M. (2006). Leadership for social justice and equity: Evaluating a transformative framework and andragogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(5), 700–745.
4.
BustamanteR. M., NelsonJ. A., & OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2009). Assessing school-wide cultural competence: Implications for school leadership preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(5), 793–827.
5.
Cambron-McCabeN., & McCarthyM. M. (2005). Educating school leaders for social justice. Educational Policy, 19(1), 201–222.
6.
CooperC. W. (2009). Performing cultural work in demographically changing schools: Implications for expanding transformative leadership frameworks. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(5), 694–724.
7.
DantleyM. E. (2005). African American spirituality and Cornel West's notion of prophetic pragmatism: Restructuring educational leadership in American urban schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(4), 651–674.
8.
DantleyM. E., & TillmanL. C. (2006). Social justice and moral transformative leadership. In MarshallC., & OlivaM. (Eds.), Leadership for social justice: Making revolutions in education (pp. 16–30). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
Darling-HammondL., La PointeM., MeyersonD., & OrrM. T. (2010). Preparing principals for a changing world: Lessons from effective school leadership programs.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
DelgadoR., & StefancicJ. (2001). Critical race theory: An introduction.New York: NYU Press.
11.
Delgado-BernalD. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68(4), 555–582.
12.
EvansA. E. (2007). Horton, highlander, and leadership education: Lessons for preparing educational leaders for social justice. Journal of School Leadership, 17(3), 250–275.
13.
GlanzJ. (2003). Action research: An educational leader's guide to school improvement (2nd ed.). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
14.
GuerraP., & NelsonS. (2007). The journey to cultural proficiency is a sizeable challenge. National Staff Developmental Council, 28(4), 59–60.
15.
HarrisC. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8), 1707–1993.
16.
KemmisS. (2006). Participatory action research and the public sphere. Educational Action Research, 12(4), 459–476.
17.
KinslerK. (2010). The utility of action research for emancipatory change. Action Research, 8(2), 171–189.
18.
KoseB. W. (2007). Principal leadership for social justice: Uncovering the content of teacher professional development. Journal of School Leadership, 17(3), 276–312.
19.
KruegerR. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
LarrottaC., & YamamuraE. (2011). A community cultural wealth approach to Latina/o parent involvement: The promise of family literacy. Adult Basic Education and Literacy Journal, 5(2), 74–83.
21.
LawrenceC., & MatsudaM. (1997). We won't go back: Making the case for affirmative action.New York: Houghton Mifflin.
22.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
LindseyR. B., GrahamS. M., WestphalR. C., & JewC. L. (2008). Culturally proficient inquiry: A lens for identifying and examining educational gaps.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
24.
LópezG. R. (2003). The (racially neutral) politics of education: A critical race theory perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(1), 68–94.
25.
MarshallC., & OlivaM. (2010). Leadership for social justice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
26.
McGheeM., & NelsonS. W. (2005). Sacrificing leaders, villainizing leadership: How school accountability policies impair school leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(5), 367–372.
27.
McKenzieK. B., ChristmanD. E., HernandezF., FierroE., CapperC. A., DantleyM. (2008). From the field: A proposal for educating leaders for social justice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(1), 111–138.
28.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A source of new methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
MonroeC. R. (2005). Why are “bad boys” always Black? Causes of disproportionality in school discipline and recommendations for change. Clearing House, 79(1), 49–50.
30.
MorfinO. J., PerezV. H., ParkerL., LynnM., & ArronaJ. (2006). Hiding the politically obvious: A critical race theory previous of diversity as racial neutrality in higher education. Educational Policy, 20(1), 249–270.
31.
OrfieldG., & KurleanderM. (2001). Diversity challenged: Evidence on the impact of affirmative action.Boston: Harvard Educational.
32.
ParkerL., & VillalpandoO. (2007). A race(cialized) perspective on education leadership: Critical race theory in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(5), 519–524.
33.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
PerezL. G., UlineC. L., JohnsonJ. F., James-WardC., & BasomM. R. (2011). Foregrounding fieldwork in leadership preparation: The transformative capacity of authentic inquiry. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(1), 217–257.
35.
ReasonP., & BradburyH. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
ScribnerJ. D., YoungM. D., & PedrozaA. (1999). Building collaborative relationships with parents. In ReyesP., ScribnerJ. D., & Paredes-ScribnerA. (Eds.), Lessons from high-performing Hispanic schools: Creating learning communities (pp. 36–60). New York: Teachers College Press.
37.
ShieldsC. M. (2004). Dialogic leadership for social justice: Overcoming pathologies of silence. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 109–132.
38.
SingletonG. E., & LintonC. (2005). Courageous conversations about race: A field guide for achieving equity in schools.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
39.
SkrlaL., ScheurichJ. J., GarciaJ., & NollyG. (2004). Equity audits: A practical leadership tool for developing equitable and excellent schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 133–161.
40.
SmithW. A., YossoT. J., & SolórzanoD. G. (2007). Racial primes and Black misandry on historically White campuses: Toward critical race accountability in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(5), 559–585.
41.
Smith-MaddoxR., & SolórzanoD. G. (2002). Using critical race theory, Paulo Freire's problem-posing method, and case study research to confront race and racism in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 66–84.
42.
SolórzanoD. (1998). Critical race theory, race and gender microaggressions, and the experience of Chicana and Chicano scholars. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 121–136.
43.
SolórzanoD. G., & OrnelasA. (2004). A critical race analysis of Latina/o and African American advanced placement enrollment in public high schools. High School Journal, 87(3), 15–26.
44.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.London: Sage.
45.
StringerE. (2007). Action research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
TheoharisG. (2007). Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theory of social justice leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 221–258.
47.
TheoharisG. (2008). “At every turn”: The resistance that principals face in their pursuit of equity and justice. Journal of School Leadership, 18(3), 303–343.
48.
TheoharisG. (2009). The school leaders our children deserve: Seven keys to equity, social justice, and school reform.New York: Teachers College Press.
49.
TheoharisG., & Causton-TheoharisJ. N. (2008). Oppressors or emancipators: Critical dispositions for preparing inclusive school leaders. Equity and Excellence in Education, 41(2), 230–246.
50.
YossoT. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–82.
51.
YossoT. J. (2006). Critical race counterstories along the Chicana/Chicano educational pipeline.New York: Routledge.
52.
YoungM. D., & BrooksJ. S. (2008). Supporting graduate students of color in educational administration preparation programs: Faculty perspectives on best practices, possibilities, and problems. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 391–423.
