Guided by new structuralism theory, this study examined the context of novice teacher socialization, identified the frequency and substance of interactions between novice teachers and their mentors and other colleagues, and reported on novices’ evaluation of the support that they received. Data were collected through semistructured interviews with district human resource directors and teacher association presidents, as well as surveys of novice teachers in six districts in Michigan and five districts in Indiana. Findings suggest that researchers should examine the informal social structure within schools, which can mediate formal induction policy, and that administrators should institute a network approach to socializing novice teachers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchinsteinB., OgawaR. T., SextonD., & FreitasC. (2010). Retaining teachers of color: A pressing problem and a potential strategy for “hard-to-staff” schools. Review of Educational Research, 80, 71–107.
2.
AchinsteinB., OgawaR. T., & SpeiglmanA. (2004). Are we creating separate and unequal tracks of teachers? The impact of state policy, local conditions, and teacher characteristics on new teacher socialization. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 557–603.
3.
AllenN. J., & MeyerJ. P. (1990). Organizational socialization tactics: A longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers’ commitment and role orientation. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 847–858.
4.
Alliance for Excellent Education. (2004). Tapping the potential: Retaining and developing high-quality new teachers.New York: Carnegie Corporation.
5.
BallD. L., & CohenD. K. (1999). Developing practices, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional development. In Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
BarnesG., CroweE, & SchaeferB. (2007). The cost of teacher turnover in five districts: A pilot study.Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
7.
BidwellC. (2001). Analyzing schools as organizations: Long-term permanence and short-term change. Sociology of Education, 74, 100–114.
8.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), International handbook of theory and research for sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.
9.
BoydD., LankfordH., LoebS., & WyckoffJ. (2005). The draw of home: How teachers’ preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 113–132.
10.
BoydW. L., & CrowsonR. (1981). The changing conception and practice of public school administration. Review of Research in Education, 9, 311–373.
11.
BrittonE., PaineL., RaizenS., & PrimmD. (2003). Comprehensive teacher induction: Systems for early career learning.Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
12.
BrykA. S., & SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
13.
ChatmanJ. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person–organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14, 333–349.
14.
CoburnC. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 145–170.
15.
CoburnC. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institution and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77, 211–244.
16.
CoburnC. E., & RussellJ. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 203–235.
17.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
18.
CrowG. M., & PounderD. G. (2000). Interdisciplinary teacher teams: Context, design, and process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 216–254.
19.
DesimoneL., PorterA. C., GaretM., Suk YoonK., & BirmanB. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–112.
20.
Feiman-NemserS. (2010). Multiple means of new teacher induction. In WangJ., OdellS. J., & CliftR. T. (Eds.), Past, present, and future research on teacher induction: An anthology for researchers, policy makers, and practitioners (pp. 15–30). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
21.
Feiman-NemserS., & BeasleyK. (1997). Mentoring as assisted performance: A case of co-planning. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building new understandings (pp. 108–119). Washington, DC: Palmer Press.
22.
Feiman-NemserS., SchwilleS. A., CarverC., & YuskoB. (1999). A conceptual review of literature on new teacher induction.Washington, DC: National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching.
23.
FeldmanD. C. (1977). The role of initiation activities in socialization. Human Relations, 30, 977–990.
24.
FeldmanD. C. (1981). The multiple socialization of organization members. Academy of Management Review, 6, 309–318.
25.
FeldmanD. C. (1989). Socialization, resocialization and training: Reframing the research agenda. In GoldsteingI. L. & Associates (Eds.), Training and development in organizations (pp. 376–416). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
FletcherS. H., StrongM., & VillarA. (2008). An investigation of the effects of variations in mentor-based induction on the performance of students in California. Teachers College Record, 110, 2271–2289.
27.
FrankK. A. (1998). The social context of schooling: Quantitative methods. Review of Research in Education, 23, 171–216.
28.
FrankK. A., ZhaoY., & BormanK. (2004). Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: The case of computer technology in schools. Sociology of Education, 77, 148–171.
29.
FriedkinN. E., & SlaterM. R. (1994). School leadership and performance: A social network approach. Sociology of Education, 67, 139–157.
30.
FullagarC. J., GallagherD. G., GordonM. E., & ClarkP. F. (1995). Impact of early socialization on union commitment and participation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 147–157.
31.
FullagarC. J., McCoyD., & ShullC. (1992). The socialization of union loyalty. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 13–26.
32.
GlazermanS., DolfinS., BleekerM., JohnsonA., IsenbergE., Hugo-GilJ. (2008). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Results from the first year of a randomized controlled study.Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
33.
GlazermanS., IsenbergE., DolfinS., BleekerM., JohnsonA., GriderM. (2010). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Final results from a randomized controlled study.Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
34.
GranovetterM. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 1420–1443.
35.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.
36.
GrossmanP. L., & ThompsonC. (2004). District policy and beginning teachers: A lens on teacher learning. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 281–301.
37.
HanushekE., KainJ., & RivkinS. (2004). The revolving door: A path-breaking study of teachers in Texas reveals that working conditions matter more than salary. Education Next, 4(1), 77–82.
38.
HartA. W. (1993). Principal succession: Establishing leadership in schools.Albany: State University of New York Press.
39.
HobsonA. J., AshbyP., MalderezA., & TomlinsonP. D. (2009). Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don't. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 207–216.
40.
IngersollR., & PerdaD. (2010). How high is teacher turnover and is it a problem?Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
41.
IngersollR., & StrongM. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81, 201–233.
42.
IsenbergE., GlazermanS., BleekerM., JohnsonA., Hugo-GilJ., GriderM. (2009). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Results from the second year of a randomized controlled study.Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
43.
JohnsonL. S., GoldrickL., & LasagnaM. (2010). New teacher excellence: The impact of state policy on induction program implementation.Santa Cruz, CA: New Teacher Center.
44.
JohnsonR. B., & OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26.
45.
JohnsonS. M., & the Project on the Next Generation of Teachers. (2004). Finders and keepers.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46.
JonesG. R. (1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers’ adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 262–279.
47.
KapadiaK., CocaV., & EastonJ. Q. (2007). Keeping new teachers: A first look at the influences of induction in the Chicago Public Schools.Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
48.
KardosS. M., JohnsonS. M., PeskeH. G., KauffmanD., & LiuE. (2001). Counting on colleagues: New teachers encounter the professional cultures of their schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 250–290.
49.
KatzR. (1980). Time and work: Toward an integrative perspective. In StawB., & CummingsL. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 81–127). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
50.
KramK. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life.Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
51.
KristofA. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.
52.
Kristof-BrownA., ZimmermanR., & JohnsonE. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.
53.
LopezA., LashA., ShaffnerM., ShieldsP., & WagnerM. (2004). Review of research on the impact of beginning teacher induction on teacher quality and retention.Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
54.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
LouisM. R., PosnerB. Z., & PowellG. N. (1983). The availability and helpfulness of socialization practices. Personnel Psychology, 36, 857–866.
56.
LounsburyM., & VentrescaM. (2003). The new structuralism in organizational theory. Organization, 10, 457–480.
57.
MacyM. W. (1990). Chains of cooperation: Threshold effects in collective action. American Sociological Review, 56, 730–747.
58.
MaxcyS. J. (2003). Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In TashakkoriA., & TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 51–89). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59.
MertonR. K. (1963). Social theory and social structure.New York: Free Press.
60.
MeyerJ., & RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 431–450.
61.
MeyerJ., ScottR., & DealT. (1981). Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure: Explaining the structure of educational organizations. In SteinH. D. (Ed.), Organization and the human services (pp. 151–178). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
62.
NormoreA. H. (2004). Socializing school administrators to meet leadership challenges that doom all but the most heroic and talented leaders to failure. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7, 107–125.
63.
OstroffC., & KozlowskiS. W. J. (1992). Organizational socialization as a learning process: The role of information acquisition. Personnel Psychology, 45, 849–874.
64.
ParsonsT. (1960). Structure and process in modern society.Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
65.
PenuelW. R., RielM., JoshiA., PearlmanL., KimC. M., & FrankK. A. (2010). The alignment of the informal and formal organizational supports for reform: Implications for improving teaching in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 57–95.
66.
PowellW., & ColyvasJ. (2007). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In GreenwoodR. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). New York: Sage.
67.
RockoffJ. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.
68.
ScheinE. H. (1968). Organizational socialization and the profession of management. Industrial Management Review, 9, 1–16.
69.
SchwilleS. A. (2008). The professional practice of mentoring. American Journal of Education, 115, 139–167.
70.
SelznickP. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13, 25–35.
71.
SmithT. M., & IngersollR. M. (2004). Reducing teacher turnover: What are the components of effective induction?American Educational Research Journal, 41, 681–714.
StatonA. Q., & HuntS. L. (1992). Teacher socialization: Review and conceptualization. Communication Education, 41, 109–137.
75.
SteinM. K., & D'AmicoL. (2002). Inquiry at the crossroads of policy and learning: A study of a district-wide literacy initiative. Teachers College Record, 104, 1313–1344.
76.
StrongM. (2009). Effective teacher induction and mentoring: Assessing the evidence.New York: Teachers College Press.
77.
StrongM., & FletcherS. (2004). An investigation of the effects of teacher experience and teacher preparedness on the performance of Latino students in California.Berkeley, CA: Latino Policy Center.
78.
Van GennepA. (1960). The rites of passage.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
79.
Van MaanenJ. (1976). Breaking in: Socialization to work. In DubinR. (Ed.), Handbook of work, organization, and society (pp. 67–130). Chicago: Rand McNally.
80.
Van MaanenJ., & ScheinE. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In StawB. (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 209–264). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
81.
VillarA., & StrongM. (2007). Is mentoring worth the money? A benefit-cost analysis and five- year rate of return of a comprehensive mentoring program for beginning teachers. ERS Spectrum, 25(3), 1–17.
82.
WahlstromK. L., & LouisK. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The role of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 458–495.
83.
WatsonW. (1990). Types of pluralism. The Monist, 73, 350–367.
WechslerM. E., CasparyK., HumphreyD. C., & MatskoK. (2010). Examining the effects of new teacher induction.Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
86.
YoungsP. (2007a). District induction policy and new teachers’ experiences: An examination of local policy implementation in Connecticut. Teachers College Record, 109, 797–837.
87.
YoungsP. (2007b). How elementary principals’ beliefs and actions influence new teachers’ induction experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 101–137.
