The focus of this study was to explore the relationships between the authentic leadership of building principals and the trust, engagement, and intention to return of their teaching staffs. School principals (n = 28) and their teaching staffs (n = 633) were surveyed. Teacher trust and engagement were found to be significantly related to principal authenticity. When schools were partitioned along a continuum of principal-teacher agreement about authenticity, the schools whose principals had lower ratings than their teachers had significantly more teacher trust and engagement, and their teachers expressed significantly greater intention to return. Results are discussed concerning implications for future research and improvement of practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbrechtS., & SevastosP. (2000). Dimensions and structure of trust and trustworthiness in senior management. In Proceedings of the inaugural Newcastle conference “Trust in the Workplace—Beyond the Quick Fix” (pp. 35–47). Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK: University of Newcastle.
2.
AtkinsP. W. V., & WoodR. E. (2002). Self- versus others’ ratings as predictors of assessment center ratings: Validation evidence for 30-degree feedback programs. Personal Psychology, 55, 871–904.
3.
AtwaterL. E., OstroffC., YammarinoF. J., & FleenorJ. W. (1998). Self-other agreement: Does it really matter?Personal Psychology, 51, 577–598.
4.
AtwaterL. E., & YammarinoF. J. (1992). Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions?Personnel Psychology, 45, 141–164.
5.
AvolioB. (2007). Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. American Psychologist, 62(1), 25–33.
6.
AvolioB., & GardnerW. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315–338.
7.
AvolioB., GardnerW., WalumbwaF., LuthansF., & MayD. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801–823.
8.
BassB. M., & YammarinoF. J. (1991). Congruence of self and others’ leadership ratings of naval officers for understanding successful performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 40(4), 437–454.
9.
BegleyP. (2001). In pursuit of authentic leadership practices. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4, 353–365.
10.
BinghamR. D., HaubrichP.A., & WhiteS. B. (1993). Explaining teacher/principal differences in evaluating schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 31(1), 70–76.
11.
BirdJ. J., WangC., WatsonJ., & MurrayL. (2009). Relationships among principal authentic leadership and teacher trust and engagement levels. Journal of School Leadership, 19(2), 153–171.
12.
BoglerR., & SomechA. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 277–289.
13.
BransonC. (2007). Effects of structured self-reflection on the development of authentic leadership practices among Queensland primary school principals. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 35(2), 225–246.
14.
BrownK. M., & WynnS. R. (2007). Teacher retention issues: How some principals are supporting and keeping new teachers. Journal of School Leadership, 17(6), 664–698.
15.
BrownK. M., & WynnS. R. (2009). Finding, supporting, and keeping: The role of the principal in teacher retention issues. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8, 37–63.
16.
BrutusS., FleenorJ. W., & TisakJ. (1999). Exploring the link between rating congruence and managerial effectiveness. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 16(4), 308–323.
17.
BrykA. S., & SchneiderB. (2003). Trust in schools: A core resource for school reform. Educational Leadership, 60, 40–46.
18.
BuckinghamM., & CoffmanC. (1999). First break all the rules: What the world's greatest managers do differently.New York: Simon & Schuster.
19.
CameronK., DuttonJ., & QuinnR. (Eds.). (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline.San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
20.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
ConnellJ., FerresN., & TravaglioneT. (2003a). Engendering trust in manager-subordinate relationships: Predictors and outcomes. Personnel Review, 32(5), 569–587.
22.
ConnellJ., FerresN., & TravaglioneT. (2003b). Trust in the workplace: The importance of interpersonal and organizational support. Journal of Management Research, 3(3), 113–118.
23.
CouperM. P. (2000). Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 464–494.
24.
Darling-HammondL. (2003). Keeping good teachers: Why it matters, what leaders can do. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 6–13.
25.
DesimoneL. M. (2006). Consider the source: Response differences among teachers, principals, and districts on survey questions about their education policy environment. Education Policy, 20(4), 640–676.
26.
DillmanD. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method.New York: Wiley.
27.
DiPaolaM., & Tschannen-MoranM. (2001). Organizational citizenship behavior in schools and its relationship to school climate. Journal of School Leadership, 11, 424–447.
28.
EaglyA. (2005). Achieving relational authenticity in leadership: Does gender matter?The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 459–474.
29.
EasleyJ. (2008). Moral school building leadership: Investigating a praxis for alternative route teacher retention. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(1), 25–38.
30.
EndrissatN., MullerW., & Kaudela-BaumS. (2007). En route to an empirically-based understanding of authentic leadership. European Management Journal, 25(3), 207–220.
31.
FerresN., ConnellJ., & TravaglioneA. (2004). Co-worker trust as a social catalyst for constructive employee attitudes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(6), 608–622.
32.
FerresN., & TravaglioneT. (2003, December). The development and validation of the workplace trust survey: Combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Paper presented at the Ninth Asia Pacific Researchers in Organization Studies Conference, Oaxaca, Mexico.
33.
FleenorJ. W., McCauleyC. D., & BrutusS. (1996). Self-other rating agreement and leader effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 7(4), 487–507.
34.
FredricksonB. (1998). What good are positive emotions?Review of General Psychology, 3, 300–319.
35.
FurnhamA, & StringfieldP. (1994). Congruence of self and subordinate ratings of managerial practices as a correlate of supervisor evaluation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 57–67.
36.
GardnerW., AvolioB., LuthansF., MayD., & WalumbwaF. (2005). “Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 343–372.
37.
GardnerW., & SchermerhornJ.Jr. (2004). Unleashing individual potential: Performance gains through positive organizational behavior and authentic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 33, 270–281.
38.
GeorgeB., SimsP., McLeanA, & MayerD. (2007). Discovering your authentic leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85, 129–138.
39.
GoddardR. D., Tschannen-MoranM., & HoyW. K. (2001). A multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in students and parents in urban elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 3–17.
40.
GoffeeR., & JonesG. (2005). Managing authenticity: The paradox of great leadership. Harvard Business Review, 83, 87–94.
41.
GoffeeR., & JonesG. (2006). Why should anyone be led by you? What it takes to be an authentic leader.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
42.
GraenG. B., & Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years. Applying a multi-level and multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.
43.
HarterJ. K., & CreglowA. (1999). Appendix E: The meta-analysis. In BuckinghamM., & CoffmanC. (Eds.), First, break all the rules (pp. 255–267). New York: Simon & Schuster.
44.
HarterJ. K., SchmidtF. L., & KeyesC. L. (2002). Well-being in the workplace and its relationship to business outcomes: A review of the Gallup studies. In KeyesC. L., & HaidtJ. (Eds.), Flourishing: The positive person and the good life (pp. 205–224). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
45.
HopeW. C. (1999). Principals’ orientation and induction activities as factors in teacher retention. The Clearing House, 73(1), 54–56.
46.
HoyA. W., HoyW. K., & KurzN. M. (2008). Teachers’ academic optimism: The development and test of a new construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 821–835.
47.
IliesR., MorgesonF., & NahrgangJ. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader-follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 373–394.
48.
JensenS., & LuthansF. (2006a). Entrepreneurs as authentic leaders: Impact on employees’ attitudes. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 27(8), 646–666.
49.
JensenS., & LuthansF. (2006b). Relationship between entrepreneurs’ psychological capital and their authentic leadership. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18, 254–273.
50.
JohnsonS. M., & BirkelandS. E. (2003). The schools that teachers choose. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 20–24.
51.
KahnW. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Review, 33, 692–724.
52.
KaplowitzM. D., HadlockT. D., & LevineR. (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates, Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 94–101.
53.
KennyD.A., & JuddC. M. (1986). Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 422–431.
54.
KreftI., & de LeeuwJ. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
55.
LambertR. (2002). Evaluating management climate in Head Start programs: The measurement properties of the policy and program management inventory. NHSA Dialog, 6, 37–52.
56.
LuthansF., & AvolioB. (2003). Authentic leadership development. In CameronK., DuttonJ., & QuinnR. (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 241–258). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
57.
MayD., ChanA., HodgesT., & AvolioB. (2003). Developing the moral component of authentic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 32, 247–260.
58.
MayerR., DavisJ., &SchoormanF. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.
59.
MichieS., & GootyJ. (2005). Values, emotions, and authenticity: Will the real leader please stand up?The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 441–457.
60.
NorthouseP. G. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
61.
OstremL., & WheelerD. (2006, October). Engagement and trust as outcomes of servant leadership. Paper presented at the Gallup Leadership Summit, Washington, DC.
62.
PalmerN., & Fleig-PalmerM. (2006, October). Emergent adult's authentic leadership development accelerated through self-awareness. Paper presented at the Gallup Leadership Summit, Washington, DC.
63.
RaudenbushS. W., & BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
ShamirB., & EilamG. (2005). “What's your story?” A life-stories approach to authentic leadership development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 395–417.
65.
SparroweR. (2005). Authentic leadership and the narrative self. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 419–439.
66.
SpeeceD. L., RitcheyK. D., CooperD. H., RothF. P., & SchatschneiderC. (2004). Growth in early reading skills from kindergarten to third grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 312–332.
67.
SpritzerG. (2006). Leading to grow and growing to lead: Leadership development lessons from positive organizational studies. Organizational Dynamics, 35(4), 305–315.
68.
StapletonL. M. (2006). Using multilevel structural equation modeling techniques with complex sample data. In HancockG. R., & MuellerR. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 345–383). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
69.
Tschannen-MoranM., & HoyW. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593.
70.
WalumbwaF., AvolioB., GardnerW., WernsingT., & PetersonS. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126.
71.
WangC., & BirdJ. (2011). Multi-level modeling of principal authenticity and teachers’ trust and engagement. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 15(4), 125–147.
72.
WynnS., CarboniL., & PatallE. (2007). Beginning teachers’ perceptions of mentoring, climate and leadership: Promoting retention through a learning communities perspective. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(3), 209–229.
73.
YammarlnoF. J., & AtwaterL. E. (1997). Do managers see themselves as others see them? Implications of self-other rating agreement for human resources management. Organizational Dynamics, 24(4), 35–44.
