National advocacy groups have undertaken significant efforts to define the performance capacities needed by principals to lead schools in this era of continuous improvement and accountability. There has been little articulation between the core skills essential to new principals and the leadership capacities of experienced peers. This study focused on the needs of new principals as noted by superintendents. This study posed an open-ended question to superintendents asking for a list of challenges observed in newly hired school principals. Superintendents identified three discrete areas of deficit: experience with and understanding of the range of demands faced by principals, understanding differentiated instructional practices and best practices, and functional use of personnel management strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonC., & LouhR. (2005, May/June). Leadership development for urban schools. Principal, pp. 27–29.
2.
BarnettD. (2004). School leadership preparation programs: Are they preparing tomorrow's leaders?Education, 125(1), 121–129.
3.
Browne-FerrignoT., & KnoeppelR. C. (2004, November). “Success for All”: Ensuring equitable opportunities for student learning in a high-need rural school district. Paper presented at “The Changing Face(s) of Educational Leadership: UCEA at the Crossroads,” Kansas City, MO.
4.
Center on Reinventing Public Education. (2003). Policy brief: A practical look at school leadership.Seattle, WA.: Center on Reinventing Public Education.
5.
Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2008). Educational leadership policy standards: ISLLC 2008.Washington, DC: Author.
6.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
CreswellJ. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
8.
DavisS., Darling-HammondL., LaPointM., & MeyersonD. (2005). School leadership study: Developing successful principals.Stanford, CA: Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
9.
EnglishF. W. (2004). Better leaders for America's schools: Perspectives on the manifesto. In LasleyT. (Ed.), University Council for Education Administration (UCEA) monograph series (pp. 92–114). Austin, TX: University Council for Education Administration.
10.
Garrison-WadeD., SobelD., & FulmerC. L. (2007). Inclusive leadership: Preparing principals for the role that awaits them. Educational Leadership and Administration, 19, 117–132.
11.
GoldringE., & SimsP. (2005). Modeling creative and courageous school leadership through district–community–university partnerships. Educational Policy, 19, 223–249.
12.
HallP., & HarrisR. (2008). 10 rungs to proficiency. Journal of Staff Development, 29(2), 38–40, 62.
13.
HambrightW. G., & FrancoM. S. (2008). Living the “tipping point”: Concurrent teacher leader and principal preparation. Education, 129(2), 267–273.
14.
HessF., & KellyA. (2005). An innovative look, a recalcitrant reality: The politics of principals preparation reform. Educational Policy, 19, 155–180.
15.
Institute for Educational Leadership (IEL). (2005). Preparing leaders for rural schools: Practice and policy considerations.Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
16.
LasleyT. J. (Ed.). (2004). Better leaders for America's schools: Perspectives on the manifesto.Austin, TX: University Council for Education Administration.
MarzanoR. J., WatersT., & McNultyB. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
19.
UsdanM., McCloudB., & PodmostkoM. (2000). Leadership for student learning: Reinventing the principalship. School leadership for the 21st Century Initiative: A report of the Task Force on the Principalship.Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
