Special education teachers who also serve as case managers for students with disabilities are in unique leadership positions in which they face complex ethical dilemmas and are called on to make decisions that involve multiple competing interests and pressures. The purpose of this study was to explore how special education leaders identify ethical dilemmas and to examine the ethical perspectives that influenced their decision making. Through a series of focus group interviews based on a semistructured interview protocol, special education case mangers engaged in collective discussions about ethics and ethical decision making. The findings suggest that special education leaders operate according to an ethical framework that integrates personal and professional codes of ethics and emphasizes the best interests of the child. The complexity of integrating legal compliance pressures and administrative policy directives into the framework, however, led to inner conflict for many of the participants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnoldM., & LassmannM. E. (2003). Overrepresentation of minority students in special education. Education, 124(2), 230–236.
2.
ArtilesA. J. (1998). The dilemma of difference: Enriching the disproportionality discouse with theory and context. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 32–36.
3.
BaysD. A., & CrockettJ. B. (2007). Investigating Instructional leadership for special education. Exceptionality, 15(3), 143–161.
4.
BeckL. G., MurphyJ., & Associates. (1997). Ethics in educational leadership programs: Emerging models.Columbia, MO: The University Council for Educational Administration.
5.
BegleyP. (2001). In pursuit of authentic school leadership practices. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(4), 353–365.
6.
BerkeleyT. R., & LudlowB. L. (2008). Ethical dilemmas in rural special education: A call for a conversation about the ethics of practice. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 27(1/2), 3–9.
7.
BillingsleyB. (2007). Recognizing and supporting the critical roles of teachers in special education leadership. Exceptionality, 15(3), 163–176.
8.
BogdanR. C., & BiklenS. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
9.
CampbellE. (1997). Ethical school leadership: Problems of an elusive role. Journal of School Leadership, 7(3), 287–300.
10.
CampbellE. (2001). Let right be done: trying to put ethical standards into practice. Journal of Education Policy, 16(5), 395–411.
CourtradeG. R., & LudlowB. L. (2007/2008). Ethical issues and severe disabilities: Programming for students and preparation for teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 27(1/2), 36–42.
13.
CrockettJ. B. (2002). Special education's role in preparing responsive leaders for inclusive schools. Remedial and Special Education, 23(3), 157–168.
14.
CrockettJ. B. (2007). The changing landscape of special education administration. Exceptionality, 15(3), 139–142.
15.
ErtmerP. A., RichardsonJ., & CramerJ. (2005). Professional development coaches: Perceptions of critical characteristics. Journal of School Leadership, 15(1), 52–75.
16.
FiedlerC. R., & Van HarenB. (2008, June). Knowledge and application of ethics and professional standards. Journal of Special Education, pp. 1–14.
17.
FletcherF. (1966). Situational ethics: The new morality.London: SCM Press.
18.
FrickW. C., & GutierrezK. J. (2008). Those moral aspects unique to the profession: Principals’ perspectives on their work and the implications for a professional ethic for educational leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 18, 32–61.
19.
FullanM. (2001). Leading in a culture of change.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
FurmanG. C. (2004). The ethic of community. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(2), 215–235.
21.
GlaserB. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory.Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
22.
GlaserB. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing.Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
23.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.New York: Aldine.
24.
GlesneC. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
25.
GulaR. M. (1989). Reason informed by faith.New York: Paulist Press.
26.
HartH. L. A. (1994). The concept of law (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
27.
HeltonG., & RayB. (2005). Strategies school practitioners report they would use to resist pressures to practice unethically. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 22(1), 43–65.
28.
HeltonG., & RayB. (2009). Administrative pressures to practice unethically: Research and suggested strategies. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, 11(2), 112–119.
29.
HornerJ. (2003). Morality, ethics and law: Introductory concepts. Seminars in Speech and Language, 24(4), 263–274.
30.
HoweK., & MiramontesO. B. (1991). A framework for ethical deliberation in special education. Journal of Special Education, 25(1), 7–25.
31.
HoweK., & MiramontesO. B. (1992). The ethics of special education.New York: Teachers College Press. Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400–1500 (2004).
32.
JacobS., & HartshorneT. S. (2003). Ethics and law for school psychologists.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
33.
JosephP., & EphronS. (1993). Moral choices/moral conflicts: Teachers’ self-perceptions. Journal of Moral Education, 22(3), 201–220.
34.
Larry P. v. Riles. 502 F.2d 963 (9th Cir. 1974).
35.
LedermanK. (1990). Assessing educational effectiveness: The focus group interview as a technique for data collection. Communication Education, 39(2), 117–127.
36.
LeechN. L., & OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2008). Qualitative data analysis: A compendium of techniques and a framework for selection for school psychology research and beyond. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 587–604.
37.
MathurS. R. (2007). Understanding emotional and behavioral disorders: Are we paying the cost of borderline ethics?Education and Treatment of Children, 30(4), 11–26.
38.
MaxwellJ., & MillerB. (2008). Categorizing and connecting strategies in qualitative data analysis (with Barbara Miller). In LeavyP., & Hesse-BiberS. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 461–478). New York: Guildford Press.
39.
MorganD. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
40.
MorganD. L. (2002). Focus group interviewing. In GubriumJ., & HolsteinJ. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (pp. 141–160). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
MuellerT. G., SingerG. H., & DraperL. M. (2008). Reducing parental dissatisfaction with special education in two school districts: Implementing conflict prevention and alternative dispute resolution. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 18, 191–233. DOI: 10.1080/10474410701864339.
42.
MurryF. (2005). Effective advocacy for students with emotional/behavioral disorders: How high the cost?Education and Treatment of Children, 28(4), 414–429.
43.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Public Law 107–110, 115 Stat. 1425 et seq.
44.
NoddingsN. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education.New York: Teachers College Press.
45.
OlivierD. F., & HippK. K. (2006). Leadership capacity and collective efficacy: Interacting to sustain student learning in a professional learning community. Journal of School Leadership, 16(5), 505–519.
46.
PainterS. R. (2006). Considering institutional character and leadership domains in K-12 principal training, licensing, and selection. Connections, 7, 1–12.
47.
PaulJ., FrenchP., & Cranston-GingrasA. (2001). Ethics and special education. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34(1), 1–16.
48.
RoyP., & HordS. M. (2006). It's everywhere, but what is it? Professional learning communities. Journal of School Leadership, 16(5), 490–501.
49.
SergiovanniT. J. (1992). Moral leadership getting to the heart of school improvement.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
50.
ShapiroJ., & StefkovichJ. (2005). Ethical leadership and decision making in education: Applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51.
StarrattR. J. (1991). Building an ethical school: A theory for practice in educational leadership. Education Administration Quarterly, 27, 185–202.
StarrattR. J. (2004). Ethical leadership.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54.
StefkovichJ., & BegleyP. T. (2007). Ethical school leadership: Defining the best interests of students. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(2), 213–224.
55.
StraussA. (1987). Qualitative research for social scientists.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
StrikeK. (1995). Professional ethics and the education of professionals. Educational Horizons, 74(1), 29–36.
58.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2010). Digest of education statistics, 2009 (NCES 2010–013). Retrieved September 22, 2010, from http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=64
59.
VaughnS., SchummJ. S., & SinagubJ. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
WesleyP. W., & BuysseV. (2006). Ethics and evidence in consultation. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26(3), 131–141.
