Opportunity gaps are not just a phenomenon that exists among low-achieving and average students; they are a significant feature among high-performing students as well. We present a review of research-based practices that support students of color such that they achieve at high levels in middle and secondary schools. We identify five key strategies for success: close monitoring of students’ academic and social growth, access to high-quality curriculum, appropriate scaffolding to ensure academic success, academically oriented supportive peer groups, and opportunities for social and emotional growth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelmanC. (2004). Principal indicators of student academic histories in postsecondary education, 1972–2000.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
2.
BartonP. (2003). Parsing the achievement gap: Baselines for tracking progress.Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
3.
Bell-McKenzieK., ChristmanD., HernandezF., FierroE., CapperC., & DantleyM. (2007). From the field: A proposal for educating leaders for social justice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(1), 111–138.
4.
BerendsM., BodillyS., & KirbyS. (2002). Facing the challenges of whole-school reform: New American Schools after a decade.Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
5.
BourdieuP., & PasseronJ. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, and culture.London: Sage.
6.
BrayW. (2007). A study of teacher transitions to a reform-based mathematics curriculum in an urban school: The interaction of beliefs, knowledge, and classroom practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
7.
BrigmanG., & CampbellC. (2003). Helping students improve academic achievement and school success behavior. Professional School Counseling, 7, 91–98.
8.
BurrisC., HeubertJ., & LevinH. (2006). Accelerating mathematics achievement using heterogeneous grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 43(1), 103–134.
9.
BurrisC., WelnerK., WileyE., & MurphyJ. (2007). A world class curriculum for all. Educational Leadership, 64(7), 53–56.
10.
BurtonN., WhitmanN., Yepes-BarayaM., ClineF., & KimR. (2002). Minority student success: The role of teachers in advanced placement program courses.New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
11.
CohenP., KulikJ., & KulikC. (1982). Education outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 237–248.
12.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
13.
CooperH., & HedgesL. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
CsikszentmihalyiM., & SchneiderB. (2000). Becoming adult: How teenagers prepare for the world of work.New York: Basic Books.
15.
DiMaggioP. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on the grades of U.S. high school students. American Sociological Review, 47, 189–201.
16.
DuboisD., HollowayJ., ValentineJ., & CooperH. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Psychology, 30(2), 157–201.
17.
EckertP. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school.New York: Teachers College Press.
18.
EliasM. (2006). The connection between academic and social–emotional learning. In EliasM. J., & ArnoldH. (Eds.), The educator's guide to emotional intelligence and academic achievement (pp. 4–15). Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press.
19.
FriedlaenderD., & Darling-HammondL. (2007). High schools for equity.Stanford, CA: School Redesign Network at Stanford University.
20.
GamoranA., PorterA. C., SmithsonJ., & WhiteP. A. (1997). Upgrading high school mathematics instruction: Improving learning opportunities for low-achieving, low-income youth. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(4), 325–388.
21.
GándaraP. (1995). Over the ivy walls: The educational mobility of low-income Chicanos.Albany: State University of New York Press.
22.
GándaraP. (2002). A study of high school Puente: What we have learned about preparing Latino youth for postsecondary education. Educational Policy, 16(4), 474–495.
23.
GándaraP. (2005). Latino achievement: Identifying models that foster success.Hartford, CT: National Center for the Gifted and Talented.
24.
GándaraP., & BialD. (2001). Paving the way to postsecondary education: K–12 intervention programs for underrepresented youth (NCES Pub. No. 2001-205). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
25.
GándaraP., & ContrerasF. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policies.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
GándaraP., GutierrezD., & O'HaraS. (2001). Planning for the future in rural and urban high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 6(1-2), 73–93.
27.
GarmezyN. (1991). Resilience and vulnerability to adverse developmental outcomes associated with poverty. American Behavioral Scientist, 34(4), 416–430.
28.
GarrityD. (2004). Detracking with vigilance. School Administrator, 61(7), 24–27.
GibsonM. (2005). Promoting academic engagement among minority youth: Implications from John Ogbu's Shaker Heights ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(5), 581–603.
31.
GibsonM., GándaraP., & KoyamaJ. P. (2004). The role of peers in the schooling of U.S. Mexican youth. In GibsonM. A., GándaraP., & KoyamaJ. P. (Eds.), School connections: U.S. Mexican youth, peers, and school achievement (pp. 1–17). New York: Teachers College Press.
32.
GoldenbergC., GallimoreR., ReeseL., & GarnierH. (2001). Cause or effect? A longitudinal study of immigrant Latino parents’ aspirations and expectations, and their children's school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 547–582.
33.
GordonE. W. (2004). All students reaching the top.Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.
34.
HebertT. P., & ReisS. M. (1999). Culturally diverse high-achieving students in an urban high school. Urban Education, 34(4), 428–457.
35.
HedgesL. (2000). Using converging evidence in policy formation: The case of class size research. Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(3-4), 193–205.
36.
HugoE. (2003). Rethinking counseling for college: Perceptions of school and counselors roles in increasing college enrollment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
37.
JamesM. C. (2008). Education no longer deferred: The possibilities of educating urban African American males in a single gender school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station.
38.
KalmijnM., & KraaykampG. (1996). Race, cultural capital, and schooling: An analysis of trends in the United States. Sociology of Education, 69, 22–34.
39.
KaoG. (2004). Social capital and its relevance to minority and immigrant populations. Sociology of Education, 77, 172–183.
40.
KempleJ. J., HerlihyC. M., & SmithT. J. (2005). Making progress toward graduation: Evidence from the talent development high school model.New York: MDRC.
41.
KimballK., & SirotnikK. A. (2000). The urban school principalship: Take this job and … !Education and Urban Society, 32(40), 535–543.
42.
KincheloeJ. L., HayesK., RoseK., & AndersonP. M. (Eds.). (2007). Urban education: A comprehensive guide for educators, parents and teachers.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
43.
KirstM., & BraccoK. (2004). Bridging the great divide: How the K–12 postsecondary split hurts students, and what can be done about it. In KirstM. W., & VeneziaA. (Eds.), From high school to college: Improving opportunities for success in postsecondary education (pp. 1–30). San Francisco: Wiley.
44.
KuhG. D., KinzieJ., BuckleyJ., BridgesB., & HayekJ. C. (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions, and recommendations.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45.
LareauA. (1987). Social class differences in family–school relationship: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60, 73–85.
46.
LeggettA. (2007). California teachers’ perceptions of standards-based reform in middle school science: A mixed-methods study (Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3282042)
47.
MarshallC., & OlivaM. (2009). Leadership for social justice: Making revolutions in education.New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
48.
MartinI., KarabelJ., & JaquezS. W. (2005). High school segregation and access to the University of California. Educational Policy, 19(2), 308–330.
49.
MaxwellL. (2006). Greater expectations: The San Jose district did away with a two-track high school system and instead demanded that all of its students take a college-prep course of study. Education Week, 25(33), 37–39.
50.
MayerA. (2006). Interrupting social reproduction: The implementation of an International baccalaureate Diploma Program in an urban high school.Doctoral Dissertation: University of California, Davis.
51.
MayerA. (2008). Expanding opportunities for high academic achievement: An International Baccalaureate Diploma Program in an urban high school. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19, 2, 202–235.
52.
MaysN., PopeC., & PopayJ. (2005). Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 10(1), 6–20.
53.
MehanH., VillanuevaI., HubbardL., & LintzA. (1996). Constructing school success: The consequences of untracking low-achieving students.New York: Cambridge University Press.
54.
MetzM. H. (1990). Real school: A universal drama amid disparate experience. In MitchellD., & GoertzM. (Eds.), Education politics for the new century: The 20th anniversary yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (pp. 75–91). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
55.
MilesK. H., & Darling-HammondL. (1998). Rethinking the allocation of teaching resources: Some lessons from high-performing schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 9–29.
56.
MunceyD. E., & McQuillanP. J. (1996). Reform and resistance in schools and classrooms: An ethnographic view of the coalition of essential schools.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
57.
MuraskinL., & LeeJ. (2004). Raising the graduation rates of low-income college students.Washington, DC: Pell Institute.
58.
OakesJ., MendozaJ., & SilverD. (2006). California opportunity indicators: Informing and monitoring California's progress toward equitable college access. In GandaraP., OrfieldG., & HornC. (Eds.), Expanding opportunity in higher education: Leveraging promise (pp. 19–52). Albany: State University of New York Press.
59.
OakesJ., RogersJ., SilverD., ValladaresS., TerriquiezV., McDonoughP. (2006). Removing the roadblocks: Fair college opportunities for all California students.Los Angeles: UC ACCORD.
60.
QuintJ. (2006). Meeting five critical challenges of high school reform.Oakland, CA: MDRC.
61.
RodgersM., SowdenA., PetticrewM., AraiL., RobertsH., BrittenN. (2009). Testing methodological guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: Effectiveness of interventions to promote smoke alarm ownership and function. Evaluation, 15(1), 49–74.
62.
RubinB. C. (2003). Unpacking detracking: When progressive pedagogy meets students’ social worlds. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 539–573.
63.
SchultzJ. L., & MuellerD. (2006). Effectiveness of programs to improve post-secondary education enrollment and success of underrepresented youth: A literature review.St. Paul, MN: Wilder Research.
64.
Stanton-SalazarR. (2004). Gangs and group membership, implications for schooling. In GibsonM., GándaraP., & KoyamaJ. (Eds.), School connections: U.S. Mexican youth, peers and academic achievement (pp. 18–38). New York: Teachers College Press,
65.
Stanton-SalazarR., & SpinaS. (2000). The network orientations of highly resilient urban minority youth: A network-analytic account of minority socialization and its educational implications. Urban Review, 32(30), 227–261.
66.
SteinbergL. (1996). Beyond the classroom: Why school reform has failed and what parents need to do.New York: Simon & Shuster.
67.
StevensonD. L., SchillerK. S., & SchneiderB. (1994). Sequences of opportunities for learning. Sociology of Education, 67, 184–98.
68.
SwansonM., MarcusM., & ElliottJ. (2000). Rigor with support: Lessons from AVID. Leadership, 30(2), 37–38.
69.
TheoharisG. (2007). Navigating rough waters: A synthesis of the countervailing pressures against leading for social justice. Journal of School Leadership, 17(1), 4–27.
70.
TierneyW. G., & ColyarJ. (2004). The role of peer groups in college preparation programs. In TierneyW. G., ColyarJ., & CorwinZ. B. (Eds.), From high school to college: Who to involve and what to do to improve college access for under-represented youth (pp. 49–68). Albany: State University of New York Press.
71.
TierneyW. G., & KezarA. (2006). Mentoring scaffolds: Do they promote college access?Los Angeles: Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis.
72.
WernerE. E. (1995). Resilience in development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 81–85.
73.
YonezawaS., & JonesM. (2007). Students’ perspectives on tracking and de-tracking. Theory Into Practice, 45(1), 15–23.
74.
YonezawaS., WellsA. S., & SernaI. (2002). Choosing tracks: Freedom of choice in detracking schools. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 37–76.
75.
ZinsJ. E., & EliasM. J. (2004). Social and emotional learning. In ZinsJ. E., WeissbergR. P., WangM. C., & WallbergH. J. (Eds.), Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? (pp. 1–13). New York: Teachers College Press.
