As part of a larger study of two middle-grade schools, we interviewed novice teachers, their mentors, and administrators to determine their perceptions of various aspects of a multifaceted induction program. During the initial analysis, stories repeatedly surfaced about the administrator's role in the induction process. Reanalysis of the data revealed a higher frequency of stories about the administrator in relationship to other elements of induction. The narratives of novice teachers revealed the importance of the school administrator in the induction process. The principal positively contributed to teachers’ personal needs through interactions and orchestration of a healthy school climate.
BickmoreD. L., & BickmoreS. T. (2010). A multifaceted approach to teacher induction. Teaching and Teacher Education.
3.
BickmoreD. L., BickmoreS. T., & HartL. E. (2005). Interdisciplinary teaming as an induction practice. NASSP Bulletin, 89(644), 30–53.
4.
BrockB. L., & GradyM. L. (1998). Beginning teacher induction programs: The role of the principal. Clearing House, 71(3), 179–183.
5.
BrockB. L., & GradyM. L. (2001). From first-year to first-rate: Principals guiding beginning teachers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
6.
BrownK. M., RoneyK., & AnfaraV. A. (2003). Organizational health directly influences student performance at the middle level. Middle School Journal, 34(5), 5–15.
7.
BrunerJ. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
CarverC., & Feiman-NemsorS. (2009). Using policy to improve teacher induction: Critical elements and missing pieces. Educational Policy, 23(2), 295–328.
9.
ConnellyF. M., & ClandininD. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.
10.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2008). Educational leadership policy standards: ISLLC 2008. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/ISLLC2008Research
11.
Darling-HammondL. (2003). Keeping good teachers: Why it matters what leaders can do. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 6–13.
12.
DenzinN. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
Feiman-NemserS. (2003). What new teachers need to learn. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 25–29.
14.
FultonK., YoonI., & LeeC. (2005). Induction into learning communities.Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
15.
GanserT. (1999). Reconsidering the relevance of Veenman's (1984) meta-analysis of the perceived problems of beginning teachers.Montreal, Quebec, Canada: American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED429964)
16.
GanserT. (2001). The principal as new teacher mentor. Journal of Staff Development, 22(1), 39–41.
17.
GoldY. (1996). Beginning teacher support: Attrition, mentoring, and induction. In SikulaJ. P., ButteryT. J., & GuytonE. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: A project of the Association of Teacher Educators (2nd ed., pp. 548–594). New York: Macmillan.
18.
GuarinoC. M., SantibanezL., & DaleyG. A. (2006). Teacher Recruitment and Retention: A Review of the Recent Empirical Literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 173–208.
HallingerP., & HeckR. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.
21.
HoyW. K., & HannumJ. W. (1997). Middle school climate: An empirical assessment of organizational health and student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(3), 290–311.
22.
HoyW. K., SaboD. J., BarnesK. M., HannumJ. W., & HoffmanJ. D. (1998). Quality middle schools: Open and healthy.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
23.
Huling-AustinL. (1986). What can and cannot reasonably be expected from teacher induction programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 2–5.
24.
IngersollR. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortage: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.
25.
IngersollR. M. (2002). The teacher shortage: A case of wrong diagnosis and wrong prescription. NASSP Bulletin, 86(631), 16–31.
26.
IngersollR. M., & SmithT. M. (2003). The wrong solution to the teacher shortage. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 30–33.
27.
JacksonA., & DavisG. A. (2000). Turning points 2000: Educating adolescents in the 21st century.New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
JohnsonS. M., & BirkelandS. E. (2003). Pursuing a “sense of success”: New teachers explain their career decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 581–617.
29.
KardosS. M., JohnsonS. M., PeskeH. G., KauffmanD., & LiuE. (2001). Counting on colleagues: New teachers encounter the professional cultures of their schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(2), 250–290.
30.
MarkJ. H., & AndersonB. D. (1985). Teacher survival rates in St. Louis, 1969–1982. American Educational Research Journal, 22(3), 413–421.
31.
National Middle School Association. (1992). This we believe.Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
32.
National Middle School Association. (1995). This we believe: Developmentally responsive middle level schools.Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
33.
National Middle School Association. (2001). This we believe: And now we must act.Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association.
34.
OdellS. J., & FerraroD. P. (1992). Teacher mentoring and teacher retention. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 200–204.
35.
RiessmanC. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
ScherffL. (2008). Disavowed: The stories of two novice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 24(5), 1317–1332.
37.
SchlechtyP. C., & VanceV. S. (1983). Recruitment, selection, and retention: The shape of the teaching force. Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 469–487.
38.
SerpellZ., & BozemanL. A. (1999). Beginning teacher induction: A report on beginning teacher effectiveness and retention.Washington, DC: National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching.
39.
SeyfarthJ. T. (2008). Human resource leadership for effective schools (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
40.
TillmanL. C. (2005). Mentoring new teachers: Implications for leadership practice in an urban school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(4), 609–629.
41.
VeenmanS. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143–178.
42.
WangJ., & OdellS. J. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to standards-based reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 481–546.
43.
WangJ., OdellS. J., & SchwilleS. A. (2008). Effects of teacher induction on beginning teachers’ teaching: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(2), 132–152.
44.
WatersJ. T., MarzanoR. J., & McNultyB. A. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement.Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
45.
WeissE. M. (1999). Perceived workplace conditions and first-year teachers’ morale, career choice commitment, and planned retention: A secondary analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(8), 861–879.
46.
WeissE. M., & WeissS. G. (1999). Beginning teacher induction.Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED436487)
47.
WiebkeK., & BardinJ. (2009). New teacher support. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 34–36.
48.
YoungsP. (2007). How elementary principals’ beliefs and actions influence new teachers’ experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 101–137.
