Influential texts have long identified principals as being essential to school success. Accordingly, high expectations and pressures have attended the principalship and affected the professionals who occupy it. This exploration asked three interrelated questions: What pressures have urban school principals typically faced, in the past and today? What new pressures have emerged? What effects have these pressures had on principals and the prospect for lasting urban school improvement? To answer these questions, historical and contemporary artifacts were analyzed, as well as data from interviews with 17 principals from one large urban district. Findings indicate that today, even more so than in the past, the urban principalship is characterized by extensive responsibilities and limited control, nested in a context of relentless accountability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckermanR. H., & Maslin-OstrowskiP. (2002). The wounded leader: How real leadership emerges in times of crisis.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
AnyonJ. (1997). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban educational reform.New York: Teachers College Press.
3.
Bars shirt waist boy: High school principal sends many pupils home. (1901, June 14). Washington Post, p. 2. Retrieved from ProQuest Historical Newspapers database, Washington Post (1877–1992).
4.
BeckL. G., & MurphyJ. (1993). Understanding the principalship: Metaphorical themes 1920s–1990s.New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
BoothA., GrangerD. A., MazurA., & KivlighanK. (2006). Testosterone and social behavior. Social Forces, 85(1), 168–182.
6.
BrownK. (2005). Pivotal points: History, development, and promise of the principalship. In EnglishF. W. (Ed.), The Sage handbook of educational leadership (pp. 109–141). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
BrubakerD. (1995, November). How the principalship has changed: Lessons from principals’ life stories. NASSP Bulletin, 79, 88–95.
8.
BuchananB. (2002, August 18). Long hours. High expectations. Increasing demands. Intense scrutiny: Principal issues Guilford schools face growing turnover. Greensboro News & Record, p. A1.
9.
BurgerJ. M. (1997). Personality.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
10.
CaseyK. (1993). I answer with my life: Life histories of women teachers working for social change.New York: Routledge.
11.
CoreyG. (1996). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy (5th ed). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
12.
CubanL. (1976). Urban school chiefs under fire.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
CubanL. (1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools.Albany: State University of New York Press.
14.
CushingK. S., KerrinsJ. A., & JohnstoneT. (2003). Disappearing principals: What is the real reason behind the shortage of applicants for principal positions across the state and nation? It's the job, stupid. Leadership, 32(5), 28–29, 37.
15.
DareshJ. C. (2006). Beginning the principalship: A practical guide for new school leaders (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
16.
EaganG. (2002). The skilled helper: A problem-management and opportunity-development approach to helping (7th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
GatesS. M., RingelJ. S., DantibanezL., GuarinoC., Ghosh-DastidarB., & BrownA. (2006). Mobility and turnover among school principals. Economics of Education Review, 25(3), 289–302.
20.
GonzalezM. (2007). Labour pain: Mental health in the workplace. Maclean's, 120(9), 10.
21.
GoodwinR. H., CunninghamM. L., & EagleT. (2005). The changing role of the secondary principal in the United States: An historical perspective. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 37(1), 1–17.
HallingerP. (1992). The evolving role of American principals: From managerial to instructional to transformational leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 30, 35–48.
HowleyA., AndrianaivoS., & PerryJ. (2005, April). The pain outweighs the gain: Why teachers don't want to become principals. Teachers College Record, 107(4), 757–782.
30.
IrwinJ. R. (1973). A ghetto principal speaks out: A decade of crisis in urban public schools.Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
31.
KafkaJ. (2009). The principalship in historical perspective. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(3), 318–330.
LabareeD. F. (2009). The winning ways of a losing strategy: Educationalizing social problems in the United States. Educational Theory, 58(4), 447–460.
35.
LaddH. F. (1999). The Dallas school accountability and incentive program: An evaluation of its impacts on student outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 18, 1–16.
36.
LaddH. F., & ZelliA. (2002). School-based accountability in North Carolina: The responses of school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(4), 494–529.
37.
MarzanoR. J., WatersT., & McNultyB. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results.Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
38.
McGheeM. W., & NelsonS. W. (2005). Sacrificing leaders, villainizing leadership: How educational accountability policies impair school leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(5), 367–372.
PeckC. (2009, August). “Feet to the fire”: Examining urban school principal accountability. Paper presented at National Council of Professors of Educational Administration annual conference, San Antonio, TX.
48.
PeckC., & MullenC. A. (2008). New media, new voices: A complex school public relations and human resource challenge. Journal of School Public Relations, 29(3), 401–424.
49.
PerkinsonH. J. (1977). The imperfect panacea: American faith in education, 1865–1976 (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
50.
PerlsteinL. (2007). Tested: One American school struggles to make the grade.New York: Holt.
51.
PerryA. C. (1919). The management of a city school (Rev. ed.). New York: Macmillan.
52.
PounderD. G., & MerrillR. (2001). Lost luster. School Administrator, 58(10), 18–22.
ReitzugU. C., WestD. L., & AngelR. B. (2008). Conceptualizing instructional leadership: The voices of principals. Education and Urban Society, 40(6), 694–714.
57.
RiessmanC. K. (1993). Narrative analysis.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
58.
RobbinsP., & AlvyH. B. (2009). The principal's companion: Strategies for making the job easier (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
59.
RominesK. (1997). A principal's story: Two year effort to turn around Edison Elementary School in San Francisco.San Francisco: Study Center Press.
60.
RousmaniereK. (2007). Go to the principal's office: Toward a social history of the school principal in North America. History of Education Quarterly, 47(1), 1–21.
61.
SchoenL. T., & FusarelliL. D. (2008). Innovation, NCLB, and the fear factor: The challenge of leading 21st-century schools in an era of accountability. Educational Policy, 22(1), 181–203.
62.
ShippsD., & WhiteM. (2009). A new politics of the principalship? Accountability-driven change in New York City. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(3), 350–373.
63.
SpencerJ. (2009). A “new breed” of principal: Marcus Foster and urban school reform in the United States, 1966–1969. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 41(3), 285–300.
64.
SpillaneJ. P., DiamondJ. B., BurchP., HallettT., JitaL., & ZoltnersJ. (2002). Managing in the middle: School leaders and the enactment of accountability policy. Educational Policy, 16(5), 731–762.
SundermanG. L., OrfieldG., & KimJ. S. (2006). Flawed assumptions: How No Child Left Behind fails principals. Principal Leadership, 6(8), 16–19.
67.
TillmanL. (2004). African American principals and the legacy of Brown. Review of Research in Education, 28, 101–146.
68.
TyackD., & CubanL. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69.
TyackD., & HansotE. (1982). Managers of virtue: Public school leadership in America, 1820–1980.New York: Basic Books.
70.
VinovskisM. (2009). From “A Nation at Risk” to No Child Left Behind: National education goals and the creation of federal education policy.New York: Teachers College Press.
71.
WashingtonJ. V. (1981, February 8). A principal goes to bat for Ballou High. Washington Post, pp. B1, B7. Retrieved from ProQuest Historical Newspapers database, Washington Post (1877–1992).
