The article is a report of a study of how principals select teachers. Based on one-on-one interviews with a convenience sample of 57 principals in one state, this study examined the process they used to make teacher hiring decisions, including information they had and subsequently used in making the selection decision and how they went about making the decision. The findings were then considered in terms of decision-making theory and what is known about principal effects on student learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsR., & SoderR. (1987). Principal instructional leadership and school achievement. Educational Leadership, 44, 9–11.
2.
AveryR. D., & CampionJ. E. (1982). The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research. Personnel Psychology, 35, 281–322.
3.
AveryR. D., & FaleyR. H. (1992). Fairness in selecting employees (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
BargeJ. K. (1994). Communication skills for organizations and groups.New York: St. Martin's Press.
5.
BerlinerD. C. (1979). Tempus educare. In PetersonP., & WalbergH. (Eds.), Research on teaching (pp. 120–135). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
6.
BerlinerD. C. (1987). Teacher selection in the Mesa Unified School District. In WiseA. E. (Ed.), Effective teacher selection from recruitment to selection, case studies (pp. 1–51). Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
7.
BermanP., & McLaughlinM. (1978). Federal programs supporting change: Vol. 8. Implementing and sustaining innovations.Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education.
8.
BossertS., DwyerD., RowanB., & LeeG. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(1), 34–64.
9.
BrookoverW., & LezotteL. (1979). Changes in school characteristics coincident with changes in student achievement.East Lansing: Michigan State University.
10.
BrowneB. A., & RankinR. J. (1986). Predicting employment in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 191–197.
11.
CarnoyM., ElmoreR., & SiskinL. S. (Eds.). (2003). The new accountability: High schools and high stakes testing.New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
12.
CohenM. D., & MarchJ. G. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity. The American college president.New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
CookC. W., & HunsakerP. L. (2001). Management and organizational behavior (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
14.
CorbinJ., & StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.
15.
CottonK. (2002). Principals and student achievement: What the research says.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
16.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five traditions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
CrumK. S., & ShermanW. H. (2007, November). Leadership success: Best practices of successful high school principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Education Administration, Alexandria, VA.
18.
CubanL. (1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools.Albany: State University of New York Press.
19.
Darling-HammondL. (1996, September). What matters most: Teachers for America's future.Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
20.
Darling-HammondL. (2001, April). What teachers know and can do is the most significant factor in what students learn. Keynote address at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
21.
Darling-HammondL., & YoungsP. (2002). Defining “highly qualified teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us?Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13–25.
22.
DipboyeR. L. (1992). Selection interviews: Process perspectives.Cincinnati, OH: Southwest.
23.
DipboyeR. L., & GauglerB. (1993). Cognitive and behavioral processes in the selection interviews. In SchmittN., BormanW. C. & Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 135–171). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
DonaldsonG. A.Jr. (1990). Teacher selection and induction.Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
25.
DoughertyT. W., TurbanD. B., & CallenderJ. C. (1994). Confirming first impressions in the employment interviewer behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 659–665.
26.
DukeD. L. (1987). School leadership and instructional improvement.New York: Random House.
27.
EderR. W., & HarrisM. M. (Eds.). (1999). The employment interview handbook.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
EdmondsR. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15–24.
29.
EllisT. I., JensenK. C., PieleP. K., & SmithS. C. (1987, January). Improving school effectiveness through reform of teacher selection practices and collegial observation of classroom performance.Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. UD025440)
30.
EtzioniA. (1964). Modern organizations.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31.
GetzelsJ. W., & GubaE. G. (1957). Social behavior and the administrative process. School Review, 65, 432–441.
32.
GetzelsJ. W., LiphamJ. M., & CampbellR. F. (1968). Educational administration as a social process: Theory, research, practice.New York: Harper & Row.
33.
GlassG. V. (2002). Teacher characteristics. In MolnarA. (Ed.), School reform proposals: The research evidence (pp. 95–112). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
34.
GoodT. L. (1987). Two decades of research on teacher expectations: Findings and future directions. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(4), 32–47.
35.
GortonR. (1980). School administration and supervision.Dubuque, IA: Brown.
36.
GreenR. L. (2001). Practicing the art of leadership.Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
37.
GreenbergJ., & BaronR. A. (1993). Behavior in organizations (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
HallingerP. (1992). Changing norms of principal leadership in the United States. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(3), 35–48.
41.
HallingerP., BickmanL., & DavisK. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 527–549.
42.
HallingerP., & HeckR. H. (1996, February). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of the empirical literature, 1980–1985. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.
43.
HallingerP., & LeithwoodK. (1998). Unseen forces: The impact of social culture on school leadership. Peabody Journal of Education, 73(2), 126–151.
44.
HallingerP., LeithwoodK., & MurphyJ. (Eds.). (1993). Cognitive perspectives on educational leadership.New York: Teachers College Press.
45.
HammondJ. S., KeeneyR. L., & RaiffaH. (1998, September/October). The hidden traps in decision making. Harvard Business Review, pp. 47–58.
46.
HarreR., & SecordP. F. (1972). The explanation of social behavior.Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwood.
47.
HedgesL., LaineR., & GreenwaldR. (1994). A meta-analysis of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 5–14.
48.
HoyW. K., & TarterJ. C. (1995). Administrators solving the problems of practice.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
49.
JensenM. S. (1989). Leading the instructional staff. In SmithS. C., & PieleP. K. (Eds.), School leadership: Handbook for excellence (2nd ed., pp. 225–251). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
50.
JohansonG. A., & GipsC. J. (1992, October/November). The hiring preferences of secondary school principals. High School Journal, pp. 1–16.
51.
KnezevichS. (1975). Administration of public education.New York: Harper & Row.
52.
KochanF. K., JacksonB. L., & DukeD. L. (Eds.). (1999). A thousand voices from the firing line.Columbus, OH: University Council for Educational Administration.
53.
LeithwoodK., & DayC. (2007). Starting with what we know. In DayC., & LeithwoodK. (Eds.), Successful principal leadership in times of change (pp. 1–15). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
54.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (1990). Transformational leadership: How principals can help reform school cultures. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1, 249–280.
LeithwoodK. A., & RiehlC. (2003). What do we already know about school leadership.Chicago: American Educational Research Association Division A Task Force on Developing Research in Educational Leadership.
MarchJ. G., & SimonH. A. (1958). Organization.New York: Wiley.
59.
MartinW. J., & WillowerD. J. (1981). The managerial behavior of high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 17, 69–90.
60.
McClearyL., & ThompsonS. (1979). The senior high school principal (Vol. 3). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
61.
McDanielM., WhetzelD. L., SchmidtF. L., & MaurerS. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599–616.
62.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
63.
MertzN. T. (2006, November). The organizational socialization of assistant principals. Journal of School Leadership, 16, 644–675.
MullenC. A., & PatrickR. L. (2000). The persistent dream: A principal's promising reform of an at-risk elementary urban school. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 5(3), 229–250.
66.
MurnaneR., & RaizenS. (Eds.). (1988). Improving indicators of the quality of science and mathematics education in Grades K–12.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
67.
NealeM. A., & BazermanM. H. (1991). Cognition and rationality in negotiation.New York: Free Press.
68.
PurkeyS. C., & SmithM. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 427–452.
69.
ReboreR. W. (1982). Personnel administration in education.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
70.
RosenshineB. V. (1976). Recent research on teacher behaviors and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 27, 61–65.
71.
RosenthalR., & JacobsonL. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
72.
RutterM., MaughanB., MortimoreP., OustonJ., & SmithA. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
ShavelsonR., McDonnellL., & OakesJ. (1989). Indicators for monitoring mathematics and science education.Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
75.
SimonH. A. (1976). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations.New York: Free Press.
76.
SimonH. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77.
UbbenG. C., HughesL. W., & NorrisC. J. (2001). The principal: Creative leadership for effective schools (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
78.
WigginsT. (1975). The influence of role and organizational climate on principal behavior: A systems analysis. In MonahanW. G. (Ed.), Theoretical dimensions of educational administration (pp. 348–359). New York: Macmillan.
79.
YinR. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80.
YuklG. A. (1994). Leadership in organizations (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
