Leadership continues to be a central focus for research in educational administration. Until recently, many studies about leadership have been based largely on the experiences of white males and interpreted based on the structural-functionalist perspective. In this paper the writer explores the phenomenon of leadership through the eyes and experiences of six women leaders who are school principals. The findings are from a recently completed phenomenological study of six women principals’ lived experiences with leadership.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BennisW. (1984, August). The four competencies of leadership. Training and Development Journal, pp. 15–19.
2.
BlackmoreJ. (1989). Educational leadership: A feminist critique and reconstruction. In SmythJ. (Ed.), Critical perspectives on educational leadership (pp. 93–130). London: Falmer.
3.
BogdanR., & BiklenS. (1982). Qualitative research for education.Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
BogdanR., & TaylorS. (1975). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A phenomenological approach to the social sciences.New York: Wiley.
5.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Leadership.New York: Harper & Row.
6.
BurrellG., & MorganG. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis.London: Gower.
7.
CapperC. (1993). Educational administration in a pluralistic society: A multi-paradigmatic approach. In CapperC. (Ed.), Educational administration in a pluralistic society (pp. 7–35). Albany: State University of New York Press.
8.
CookJ., & FonowM. (1990). Knowledge and women's interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. In NeilsenJ. (Ed.), Readings in feminist methodology (pp. 69–93). San Francisco: Westview Press.
9.
DubinR. (1968). Person and organization. In DubinR. (Ed.), Human relations in administration (pp. 90–93). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
EtzioniA. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations.New York: Free Press.
11.
FennellH., & KingT. (1993). Women in leadership: Experiences of school administrators and nurse managers.Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
12.
FiedlerF. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness.New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
FosterW. (1986). Toward a critical theory of educational administration. In SergiovanniT., & CorballyJ. (Eds.), Leadership and organizational culture (pp. 240–259). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
14.
FosterW. (1989). Toward a critical practice of leadership. In SmythJ. (Ed.), Critical perspectives on educational leadership (pp. 39–62). London: Falmer.
15.
GlazerJ. (1991). Feminism and professionalism in teaching and educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(3), 321–342.
16.
GosettiP., & RuschE. (1995). Reexamining educational leadership: Challenging assumptions. In DunlapD., & SchmunckP. (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 1–10). Albany: State University of New York Press.
17.
GreenfieldT. (1974, July). Theory in the study of organizations and administrative structures: A new perspective. Paper presented to the Third International Intervisitation Programme of Educational Administration, Bristol, UK.
18.
GreenleafR. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness.New York: Paulist Press.
19.
HemphillJ. (1958). Administration as problem solving. In HalpinA. (Ed.), Administrative theory in education (pp. 89–118). New York: MacMillan.
20.
HoyW., & MiskelC. (1982). Educational administration: Theory, practice and change.New York: Random House.
21.
ImmegartG. (1988). Leadership and leader behaviour. In BoyanN. (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 259–279). New York: Longman Press.
22.
LambertL. (1995). Towards a theory of constructivist leadership. In LambertL. (Ed.), The constructivist leader (pp. 28–51). New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
LatherP. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 257–277.
24.
LeithwoodK., TomlinsonD., & GengeM. (1996). Transformational school leadership. In LeithwoodK., ChapmanJ., CorsonD., HallingerP., & HartA. (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration— Part 2 (pp. 785–835). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
25.
LiphamJ. (1964). Leadership and administration. In GriffithsD. (Ed.), Behavioural science and educational administration (pp. 119–141). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
MarshallC. (1988). Analyzing the culture of school leadership. Education and Urban Society, 20(2), 262–275.
MaykutM., & MorehouseR. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophical and practical guide.London: Falmer.
29.
MitchellJ. (1990). Re-visioning educational leadership: A phenomenological approach.New York: Garland.
30.
NeilsenJ. (1990). Introduction. In NeilsenJ. (Ed.), Readings in feminist methodology (pp. 1–37). San Francisco: Westview Press.
31.
OrtizF., & MarshallC. (1988). Women in educational administration. In BoyanN. (Ed.), Handbook of research in educational administration (pp. 123–143). New York: Longman Press.
32.
ShakeshaftC. (1989). The gender gap in research in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(4), 324–337.
33.
SlaterR. (1995). The sociology of leadership and educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(3), 449–472.
34.
StogdillR. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research.New York: Free Press.
35.
TaylorS., & BogdanR. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods.New York: Wiley.
36.
TeschR. (1984, April). Phenomenological studies: A critical analysis of their nature and procedures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED268122)
37.
Van ManenM. (1992). Researching lived experiences: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy.London, Ontario, Canada: Althouse Press.
38.
WatkinsP. (1989). Leadership, power and symbols in educational administration. In SmythJ. (Ed.), Critical perspectives on educational leadership (pp. 9–39). London: Falmer.
