Effective educational reform involves changes in the overall operations of schools. Teachers who collaborate, analyze the functions of their schools, and adjust their practices become leaders and participants in whole-school change. This study documents the impact of teacher leadership teams from three schools in their efforts to increase access to general education curriculum for students with disabilities, by promoting inclusion. Data were analyzed as collected from individual interviews, team self-evaluations, field observations, and focus group sessions for each site. The results offer insights into school improvement and inclusive reform efforts, and they provide a basis for future research and recommendations for practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoglerR., & SomechA. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277–289.
2.
ColeS. P. G. (1999). The structure of arguments used to support or oppose inclusion policies for students with disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 24(3), 215–225.
3.
CoplandM. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 375–395.
4.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
CreswellJ. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Darling-HammondL. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Darling-HammondL. (2005). Prepping our teachers for teaching as a profession. Education Digest, 71(4), 22–27.
8.
DeeJ. R., HenkinA. B., & DuemerL. (2003). Structural antecedents and psychological correlates of teacher empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 257–277.
9.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
ElmoreR. (2004). Knowing the right thing to do: School improvement and performance based accountability.Washington, DC: NGA Center for Best Practices.
11.
FriendM., & BursuckW. (2006). Including students with special needs: A practical guide for classroom teachers (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
FullanM. (1997). The complexity of the change process. In FullanM. (Ed.), The challenge of school change: A collection of articles. (pp. 46–58). Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight Professional Development.
13.
FullanM., & HargreavesA. (1996). What's worth fighting for in your school?New York: Teachers College.
14.
GiangrecoM. F., ChigeeJ., CloningerJ., & IversonS. (1998). Choosing options and accommodations for children: A guide to planning inclusive education (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.
15.
GronnP. (2002). Distributed leadership. In LeithwoodK., & HallingerP. (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 653–696). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16.
KeiserN. M., & ShenJ. (2000). Principals’ and teachers’ perceptions of teacher empowerment. Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(3), 115–121.
17.
KlingnerJ. K. (2004). The science of professional development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(3), 248–255.
18.
KruegerR. A. (1998). Analyzing and reporting focus group results.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
LambertL., CollayM., DietzM. E., KentK., & RichertA. E. (1997). Who will save our schools? Teachers as constructivist leaders.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
20.
LiebermanA., & MillerL. (2005). Teachers as leaders. The Educational Forum, 69, 151–162.
21.
LipskyD. K., & GartnerA. (1997). Inclusion and school reform: Transforming America's classrooms.Baltimore: Brookes.
22.
MarksH. M., & PrintyS. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397.
23.
MarksH. M., & PrintyS. M. (2006). Shared leadership for teacher and student learning. Theory Into Practice, 45(2), 125–132.
24.
McLaughlinM. J., & NoletV. (2004). Understanding special education in the 21st century: An administrators guide to critical issues in administering special education services and programs.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
25.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
MorganR. L., CruzieroP. A., & WhortonJ. E. (1997). School reform and learners with disabilities. Education, 117, 627–631.
27.
MuijsD., & HarrisA. (2006). Teacher led school improvement: Teacher leadership in the UK. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 961–972.
28.
MurphyJ. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership to school improvement.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
29.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved January 21, 2000, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html
30.
ParsadB., LewisL., & FarrisE. (2001). Teacher preparation and professional development: 2000 (NCES Document No. 2001–088). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
31.
PugachM. C., & WargerC. L. (2001). Curriculum matters: Raising expectations for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22(4), 194–213.
ReevesD. (2004). Accountability for learning: How teachers and school leaders can take charge.Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
34.
ReynoldsM., & BirchJ. (1977). Teaching exceptional children in all America's schools: A first course for teachers and principals.Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
ShortP. M. (2003). Defining teacher empowerment. Education, 114(4), 488–492.
37.
SpillaneJ. P., & DiamondJ. B. (2006). Distributed leadership in practice.New York: Teachers College Press.
38.
StakeR. E. (2000). Case studies. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–486). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
TapasakR. C., & Walther-ThomasC. S. (1999). Evaluation of a first-year inclusion program: Student perceptions and classroom performance. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 216–225.
41.
Tschannen-MoranM. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(4), 308–331.
Tschannen-MoranM., & HoyW. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 71, 547–593.
44.
Tschannen-MoranM., & Woolfolk HoyA. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805.
45.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2005). 27th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act.Washington, DC: Author.
46.
VernonL. J. (2003). Collaborative practices in schools: The impact of school-leadership team on inclusive education. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(02), 464. (UMI No. 3080232)
47.
Walther-ThomasC., KorinekL., McLaughlinV. L., & WilliamsB. T. (2000). Collaboration for inclusive education: Developing successful programs.Need-ham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
48.
WanE. (2005). Teacher empowerment: Concepts, strategies, and implications for schools in Hong Kong. Teachers College Record, 107(4), 842–861.
49.
WehmeyerM. L., LanceG. D., & BashinskiS. (2002). Promoting access to the general curriculum for students with mental retardation: A multi-level model. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 223–234.
50.
York-BarrJ., & DukeK. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 73, 255–316.
