Those Moral Aspects Unique to the Profession: Principals’ Perspectives on Their Work and the Implications for a Professional Ethic for Educational Leadership
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2008
Those Moral Aspects Unique to the Profession: Principals’ Perspectives on Their Work and the Implications for a Professional Ethic for Educational Leadership
This study examined aspects of work-related behavior considered morally and ethically unique to the profession of educational leadership as expressed by practitioners. The purpose was to empirically test and develop a practical, profession-specific ethic as articulated by Shapiro and Stefkovich (2001, 2005) and Stefkovich (2006). The study used phenomenological-like interview techniques and included 11 principals of diverse public secondary schools representing rural, suburban, suburban/metro, and urban settings. Findings suggest that practitioners can articulate a unique moral practice for educational leadership, one distinct unto itself. Implications of findings offer explanatory power of the moral, value, and ethical bases for educational leadership decision making and in developing and refining a professional ethic for educational leadership.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AppleM. (1982). Education and power.Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
2.
AshbaughC. R., & KastenK. L. (1984). A typology of operant values in school administration. Planning and Changing, 15(4), 195–208.
3.
AshbaughC. R., & KastenK. L. (1986). Administrative values and administrative action: A study of school superintendents. Planning and Changing, 17(4), 239–251.
4.
BeauchampP. L., & ChildressJ. F. (1984). Morality, ethics and ethical theories. In SolaP. (Ed.), Ethics, education, and administrative decisions: A book of readings (pp. 39–67). New York: Lang.
5.
BeckL. G. (1994). Reclaiming educational administration as a caring profession.New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
BeckL. G., & MurphyJ. (1994). Ethics in educational leadership programs: An expanding role.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
7.
BegleyP. T. (1988, April). The influence of values on principals’ problem-solving processes: An empirical study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
8.
BegleyP. T. (2005). Ethics matters: New expectations for democratic educational leadership in a global community.University Park, PA: Rock Ethics Institute.
9.
BegleyP. T., & JohanssonO. (1998). The values of school administration: Preferences, ethics, and conflicts. Journal of School Leadership, 9(4), 399–422.
10.
BellahR., MadsenR., SullivanW., SwidlerA., & TiptonS. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life.Berkley: University of California Press.
11.
BogdanR. C., & BiklenS. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
CadyD. (2005). Moral vision.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
13.
Campbell-EvansG. (1991). Nature and influence of values in principal decision making. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 37(2), 167–178.
14.
DantleyM. E. (2005). Shifting the management paradigm. In EnglishF. W. (Ed.), The Sage handbook of educational leadership: Advances in theory, research, and practice (pp. 34–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
DukesS. (1984). Phenomenological methodology in the human services. Journal of Religion and Health, 23(3), 197–203.
16.
FosterW. (1986). Paradigms and promises.Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
17.
FrickW. C. (2003, October). The principalship and interpersonal morality: Virtue, character and dispositions of absolute value. Paper presented at the eighth annual UCEA/CSLE Ethics, Values and Leadership International Conference, State College, PA.
18.
FrickW. C. (2004). The principal, school leadership, and interpersonal morality. Pennsylvania Educational Leadership, 23(2), 16–25.
19.
FurmanG. C. (Ed.). (2002). School as community: From promise to practice.Albany: State University of New York Press.
20.
FurmanG. C. (2003a). Moral leadership and the ethic of community. Values and Ethics in Educational Administration, 2(1), 1–8.
21.
FurmanG. C. (2003b). The 2002 UCEA presidential address. UCEA Review, 45(1), 1–6.
22.
FurmanG. C. (2004). The ethic of community. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(2), 215–235.
23.
FurmanG. C. (2006, November). Leadership preparation curricula. In GrossS. (Chair), Becoming a democratic–ethical educational leader: Conceptualizing values, possibilities, and agendas in New DEEL leadership preparation curricula. Flashpoint Panel No. 5.10 conducted at the convention of the University Council for Educational Administration, San Antonio, TX.
24.
GeertzC. (2000). The interpretation of cultures.New York: Basic Books.
25.
GilkeyL. (1993). Nature, reality, and the sacred.Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg-Fortress Press.
26.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
GiorgiA. (1985). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In GiorgiA. (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 8–22). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
28.
GiorgiA., FischerC., & MurrayE. (1975). (Eds.). Duquesne studies in phenomenological psychology.Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
29.
GirouxH. (1992). Educational leadership and the crisis of democratic government. Educational Researcher, 21(4), 4–11.
30.
GreenfieldW. D. (1991). The micropolitics of leadership in an urban elementary school. In BlaseJ. (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 161–184). Newberry Park, CA: Sage.
31.
GubaE. G., & LincolnY. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the effectiveness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32.
HarknessL. K. (2000). Ethics of decisions in public schools: A study on principles educational leaders use to make decisions when faced with moral dilemmas related to the use of genetic technology. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(5), 1691B. (UMI No. AAT9972222)
33.
HodgkinsonC. (1978). Towards a philosophy of administration.Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
34.
HodgkinsonC. (1991). Educational leadership: The moral art.Albany: State University of New York Press.
35.
HusserlE. (1962). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (W. R. Boyce Gibson, Trans.). New York: Collier Books. (Original work published 1913)
36.
Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium. (1996). Standards for school leaders.Washington, DC: State Education Assessment Center.
37.
Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium. (2008). Educational leadership policy standards: ISLLC 2008.Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
38.
KirbyP. C., ParadiseL. V., & ProttiR. (1992a). Ethical reasoning of educational administrators. Journal of School Leadership, 2(2), 178–187.
39.
KirbyP. C., ParadiseL. V., & ProttiR. (1992b). Ethical reasoning of educational administrators: Structuring inquiry around problems of practice. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(4), 25–33.
40.
KlinkerJ. F., & HackmannD. G. (2003, April). An analysis of principals’ ethical decision making using Rest's four component model of moral behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
41.
KockelmansJ. J. (Ed.). (1967). Phenomenology: The philosophy of Edmund Husserl and its interpretations.Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
42.
KohlbergL. (1981). The meaning and measurement of moral development.Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
43.
LangloisL., & BegleyP. T. (2005, October). Meta-ethical analysis in educational leadership: Mapping the existing models and theories. Paper presented at the 10th annual Values and Leadership Conference, University Park, PA
44.
LeCompteM. D., & PreissleJ. (1992). Toward an ethnology of student life in schools and classrooms: Synthesizing the qualitative research tradition. In LeCompteM. D., MillroyW., & PreissleJ. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 815–859). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
45.
LeCompteM. D., & SchensulJ. (1999). Analyzing and interpreting ethnographic data.Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
46.
LeithwoodK. A., & StagerM. (1989). Expertise in principals’ problem solving. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(2), 126–161.
47.
MarshallC. (1992). School administrators’ values: A focus on atypicals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(2), 368–386.
48.
MarshallC., PattersonJ. A., RogersD. L., & SteeleJ. R. (1996). Caring as career: An alternative perspective for educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(2), 271–294.
49.
Moody-AdamsM. (1997). Fieldwork in familiar places: Morality, culture, and philosophy.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
MoorheadR., & NedigerW. (1991). The impact of values on a principal's daily activities. Journal of Educational Administration, 29(2), 5–24.
51.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2007). NCATE: The standard of excellence in teacher preparation. Retrieved December 19, 2007, from http://www.ncate.org/documents/NCATEMission.pdf
53.
NoddingsN. (1988). An ethic of caring and its implications for instructional arrangements. American Journal of Education, 96(2), 215–230.
54.
NoddingsN. (1996). On community. Educational Theory, 46(3), 245–267.
55.
NoddingsN. (2002). Educating moral people: A caring alternative to character education.New York: Teachers College Press.
56.
PattonM. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
57.
PolkinghorneD. E. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry.Albany: State University of New York Press.
58.
PolkinghorneD. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In ValleR. S., & HallingS. (Eds.), Existential–phenomenological perspectives in psychology: Exploring the breadth of human experience (pp. 41–60). New York: Plenum Press.
59.
PurpelD. E. (1989). The moral and spiritual crisis in education.New York: Bergin & Garvey.
60.
RawlsJ. (1993). Political liberalism.New York: Columbia University Press.
61.
ReitzugU. (1994). A case study of empowering principal behavior. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 283–307.
62.
ReitzugU., & ReevesJ. E. (1992). “Miss Lincoln doesn't teach here”: A descriptive narrative and conceptual analysis of a principal's symbolic leadership behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(2), 185–219.
63.
RiessmanC. K. (2002). Narrative analysis. In HubermanA. M., & MilesM. (Eds.), The qualitative researcher's companion. (pp. 217–270). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
RocheK. (1999). Moral and ethical dilemmas in Catholic school settings. In BegleyP. T. (Ed.), Values and educational leadership (pp. 255–272). Albany: State University of New York Press.
65.
SeidmanI. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
66.
ShapiroJ., & StefkovichJ. (2001). Ethical leadership and decision making in education.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
67.
ShapiroJ., & StefkovichJ. (2005). Ethical leadership and decision making in education (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
68.
SimonH. A. (1957). Models of man.New York: Wiley.
69.
SimonH. A. (1993). Decision-making: Rational, nonrational, and irrational. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(3), 392–411.
70.
SolaP. (1984). (Ed.). Ethics, education, and administrative decisions: A book of readings.New York: Lang.
71.
StarrattR. J. (1991). Building an ethical school: A theory for practice in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(2), 185–202.
72.
StarrattR. J. (1994). Building an ethical school: A practical response to the moral crisis in schools.London: Falmer Press.
73.
StarrattR. J. (2004). Ethical leadership.San Francisco: Wiley.
74.
StefkovichJ. (2006). Best interests of the student: Applying ethical constructs to legal cases in education.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
75.
StefkovichJ., & O'BrienM. (2004). Best interests of the student: An ethical model. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(2), 197–214.
76.
StoreyV. A., & BeemanT. (2005, October). A value informed decision model for educational administrators. Paper presented at the 10th annual Values and Leadership Conference, University Park, PA.
77.
StrikeK., HallerE., & SoltisJ. (1998). The ethics of school administration (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
78.
SullivanW. M. (1986). Reconstructing public philosophy.Berkley: University of California Press.
79.
WalkerK. D. (1994). Notions of “ethical” among senior educational leaders. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 40(1), 21–34.
80.
WalkerK. D. (1995). A principled look a “the best interests of children.”Canadian School Executive, 15(5), 3–8.
81.
WalkerK. D. (1998). Jurisprudential and ethical perspectives on “the best interests of children.”Interchange, 29(3), 283–304.
82.
WolcottH. F. (1973). The man in the principal's office.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
