This qualitative study examines the concept of teacher leadership from the perspective of those who practice it. Viewed through the lens of identity theory analysis yielded five categories that define and describe a teacher leader—namely as a decision maker, an educational role model, a positional designee, a supra-practitioner, and a visionary. Findings reveal that the social structure where leadership is practiced shapes the definition of teacher leadership. Role identification within the social structure can assist principals in developing a healthy work climate that promotes distributed leadership.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsD., & LewisM. (2002). The experience of a professional community: Teachers developing a new image of themselves and their workplace. Educational Research, 44(3), 237–254.
2.
AshR. L., & PershallM. (2000). The principal as chief learning officer: Developing teacher leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 84(616), 15–22.
3.
BeachumF., & DentithA. (2004). Teacher leaders creating cultures of school renewal transformation. The Educational Forum, 68, 276–286.
BrooksJ. S., ScribnerJ. P., & EferakorhoJ. (2004). Teacher leadership in the context of whole school reform. Journal of School Leadership, 14, 242–264.
6.
BurkeP. J. (1980). The self: Measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1), 18–29.
7.
BurkeP. J. (2004). Identities and social structure: The 2003 Cooley-Mead Award address. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(1), 5–15.
8.
BurkeP. J., & ReitzesD. C. (1991). An identity theory approach to commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(3), 239–251.
9.
CalleroP. L. (1985). Role-identity salience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(3), 203–215.
10.
CranstonN. C. (2000). Teachers as leaders: A critical agenda for the new millennium. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 123–129.
DavidsonB. M., & DellG. L. (2003, April). A school restructuring model: A toolkit for building teacher leadership. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
FennellH. A. (1999, April). Encouraging teacher leadership. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
HallingerP., & HeckR. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.
17.
HarrisA. (2002, April). Building the capacity for school improvement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
18.
HarrisA. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility?School Leadership and Management, 23(3), 313–324.
19.
HartA. W., & BredesenP. V. (1996). The principalship: Toward professional learning and practice.New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
HoggM. A., TerryD. J., & WhiteK. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255–269.
21.
KatzenmeyerM., & MollerG. (2001). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders.Newbury Park, CACorwin Press.
22.
KriskoM. E. (2001, November). Teacher leadership: A profile to identify the potential. Paper presented at the Biennial Convocation of Kappa Delta Pi, Orlando, FL.
23.
LeithwoodK., JantziD., EarlL., WatsonN., LevinB., & FullanM. (2004). Strategic leadership for large-scale reform: The case of England's national literacy and numeracy strategy. School Leadership and Management, 24(1), 57–79.
24.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
LordR. G., DeVaderC. L., & AlligerG. M. (1986). A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership: An application of validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 403–410.
26.
McGarveyB., & MarriotS. (1997). The role of the core subject coordinator in supporting differentiation in Northern Ireland Primary Schools. School Leadership and Management, 17(3), 375–386.
27.
MilesM., SaxlE., & LiebermanA. (1988). What skills do educational “change agents” need?An empirical view Curriculum Inquiry, 18(2), 157–193.
28.
MimbsC. (2002). Leadership development as self-development: An integrated process. Action in Teacher Education, 24(3), 22–25.
29.
MollerG., Childs-BowenD., & ScrivnerJ. (2001). Teachers of the year speak out: Tapping into teacher leadership.Greensboro, NC: Southeastern Regional Vision for Education.
30.
MurphyJ. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
31.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
SilinsH., & MulfordB. (2004). Schools as learning organizations—Effects on teacher leadership and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement Journal, 15(3-4), 343–366.
33.
SilvaD. Y., GimbertB., & NolanJ. (2000). Sliding the doors: Locking and unlocking possibilities for teacher leadership. Teachers College Record, 102(4), 779–804.
34.
SmylieM. A. (1992). Teacher participation in school decision making. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 53–68.
35.
SmylieM. A., & DennyJ. W. (1990). Teacher leadership: Tensions and ambiguities in organizational perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(3), 235–259.
36.
StrykerS. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version.Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
37.
StrykerS. (1987). Identity theory: Developments and extensions. In YardleyK., & HonessT. (Eds.), Self and Identity (pp. 89–104). New York: Wiley.
38.
StrykerS., & BurkeP. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284–297.
39.
TajifelH. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations.London: Academic Press.
40.
ThorntonC. A., LangrallC. W., JonesG. A., & SwaffordJ. O. (2001). The emergence of teacher leaders through professional development.Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Math, and Environmental Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 465594)
41.
Van DickR., WagnerU., StellmacherJ., ChristO., & TissingtonP. A. (2005). To be(long) or not to be(long): Social identification in organizational contexts. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs, 131(3), 189–218.
42.
WasleyP. (1991). Teachers who lead: The rhetoric of reform and the realities of practice.New York: Teachers College Press.
43.
WasserJ. D., & BreslerL. (1996). Working in the interpretive zone: Conceptualizing collaboration in qualitative research teams. Educational Researcher, 25(5), 5–15.
44.
WhitakerK. S. (1997). Developing teacher leadership and the management team concept: A case study. The Teacher Educator, 33(1), 1–16.
45.
WynneJ. (2001). Teachers as leaders in education reform.Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 462376)
46.
York-BarrJ., & DukeK. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316.
