This study, based on interviews with 31 principals, was undertaken in response to quantitative evidence from a larger mixed-methods project that found school leaders’ collective efficacy to be a crucial link joining district leadership and conditions to school conditions and student learning. Results of this study suggest that districts contribute to building-level leaders’ sense of efficacy by establishing clear, widely shared purposes; awarding priority to the improvement of instruction; and ensuring that teachers and administrators have access to appropriate amounts of meaningful professional development aimed at developing the capacities needed to achieve the shared purposes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonS. E. (2006). The school district's role in educational change. International Journal of Educational Reform, 15(1), 13–37.
2.
AndersonS. E., & TogneriW. (2005). School district-wide reform policies in education. In BasciaN., CummingA., DatnowA., LeithwoodK., & LivingstoneD. (Eds.), International handbook of educational policy (pp. 173–194). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
4.
BanduraA. (1982). Self-efficacy and mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
5.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
BanduraA. (1993). Perceived self efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.
7.
BanduraA. (1997a). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York: Freeman.
8.
BanduraA. (1997b). Self efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
9.
ChemersM. M., WatsonC. B., & MayS. (2000). Dispositional affect and leadership effectiveness: A comparison of self-esteem, optimism and efficacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 267–277.
10.
ChenG., & BlieseP. D. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 549–556.
11.
CoffinG., & LeithwoodK. (2000). District contributions to principals’ situated learning. In LeithwoodK. (Ed.), Understanding schools as intelligent systems (pp. 19–38). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
12.
DeMoulinD. F. (1992, November). Demographic characteristics associated with perceived self-efficacy levels of elementary, middle and secondary principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Knoxville, TN.
13.
DimmockC., & HattieJ. (1996). School principals’ self-efficacy and its measurement in a context of restructuring. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(1), 62–75.
14.
DuFourR., EakerR., & DuFourR. (Eds.). (2005). On common ground: The power of professional learning communities.Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
15.
FullerB., WoodK., RapoportT., & DornbuschS. M. (1982). The organizational context of individual efficacy. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 7–30.
16.
GareisC. R., & Tschannen-MoranM. (2005, November). Cultivating principals’ sense of efficacy: Supports that matter. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Nashville, TN.
17.
GistM. E., & MitchellT. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211.
18.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory.Chicago: Aldine.
19.
GoddardR. D., HoyW. K., & Woolfolk HoyA. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479–507.
20.
GoddardR. D., HoyW. K., & Woolfolk HoyA. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3–13.
21.
HannawayJ., & KimballK. (2001). Big isn't always bad: School district size, poverty, and standards-based reform. In FuhrmanS. (Ed.), From the capitol to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states (pp. 99–123). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
HillmanS. J. (1983). Contributions to achievement: The role of expectations and self-efficacy in students, teachers, and principals. Unpublished thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington.
23.
ImantsJ. G. M., & DeBrabanderC. J. (1996). Teachers’ and principals’ sense of efficacy in elementary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(2), 179–195.
24.
KirstM., & JungR. (1980). The utility of a longitudinal approach in assessing implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2(5), 17–34.
25.
KnappM., StearnsM., TurnbullB., DavidJ., & PetersonS. (1983). Cumulative effects of federal education policies at the local level. Education and Urban Society, 15(4), 479–499.
26.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (2006, April). “Linking” leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
27.
LeithwoodK., MascallB., StraussT., SacksR., MemonN., & YashkinaA. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 37–67.
28.
LeithwoodK., & RiehlC. (2005). What we know about successful school leadership. In FirestoneW., & RiehlC. (Eds.), A new agenda: Directions for research on educational leadership (pp. 22–47). New York: Teachers College Press.
29.
LeithwoodK., Seashore-LouisK., AndersonS., & WahlstromK. (2004). How leadership influences student learning: A review of research for the Learning From Leadership Project.New York: Wallace Foundation.
30.
LeithwoodK., & SteinbachR. (1995). Expert problem solving processes: Evidence from principals and superintendents.Albany: SUNY Press.
31.
LockeE. A., & LathamG. P. (1984). Goal-setting: A motivational technique that works.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32.
LucasS. E. (2003, April). The development and impact of principal leadership self-efficacy in middle level schools: Beginning an enquiry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
33.
McCormickM. J. (2000). The influence of goal-orientation and sex-role identity on the development of leadership self-efficacy during a training intervention.College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
34.
McCormickM. J. (2001). Self-efficacy and leadership effectiveness: Applying social cognitive theory to leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(1), 22–33.
35.
PescosolidoA. T. (2003). Group efficacy and group effectiveness: The effects of group efficacy over time on group performance and development. Small Group Research, 34(1), 20–42.
36.
PetersonP., RabeB., & WongK. (1991). The maturation of redistributive programs. In OddenA. (Ed.), Education policy implementation (pp. 65–80). Albany: State University of New York Press.
37.
RobertsW. L. (1997). An investigation of the relationship between principals’ self-efficacy beliefs and their managing conflicts with teachers.Auburn, AL: Auburn University Press.
38.
RossJ., Hogaboam-GrayA., & GrayP. (2004). Prior student achievement, collaborative school processes and collective teacher efficacy. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 163–188.
39.
SadriG., & RobertsonI. T. (1993). Self-efficacy and work-related behaviour: A re-view and meta-analysis. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42(2), 139–152.
40.
SheaC. M., & HowellJ. M. (1999). Charismatic leadership and task feedback: A laboratory study of their effects on self-efficacy and task performance. Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 375–396.
41.
Tschannen-MoranM. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(4), 308–331.
42.
Tschannen-MoranM., & BarrM. (2004). Fostering student achievement: The relationship between collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 189–209.
43.
Tschannen-MoranM., & GoddardR. D. (2001, April). Collective efficacy and faculty trust in students and parents in urban schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA
44.
WaskiewiczM. V. (2002). The mediating role of sense of community in the relationship among principals’ characteristics, district characteristics, and self-efficacy beliefs of public school principals in Florida.Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
45.
ZaccaroS. J., BlairV., PetersonC., & ZazanisM. (1995). Collective efficacy. In MadduxJ. E. (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation and adjustment: Theory, research and application (pp. 305–328). New York: Plenum.
