This article reports key findings from a 2-1/2-year mixed methodological study of professional learning communities, the first of its kind in England. In particular, the concept of effectiveness is explored as it relates to professional learning communities. We describe three ways in which effectiveness can be construed, arguing that any comprehensive assessment of professional learning community effectiveness by school leaders needs to identify and attend to all three aspects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsD., & LewisM. (2004, January). Building sustainable futures: Emerging understandings of the significant contribution of the professional learning community. Paper presented at the Seventeenth Conference of the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
2.
BolamR. (1977). Innovation and problem solving in school. In KingE. (Ed.), Reorganising education: Management and participation for change.London: Sage.
3.
BolamR., McMahonA., StollL., ThomasS., WallaceM., HawkeyK. (2005). Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities (Research Rep. No. RR637). Bristol, England: University of Bristol, Department for Education and Skills. Retrieved September 3, 2006, from www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR637.pdf
4.
CordingleyP., BellM., RundellB., & EvansD. (2003). The impact of collaborative CPD on classroom teaching and learning. In Research evidence in education library.London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
5.
HargreavesA. (2003). Schooling for the knowledge society.Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
6.
LouisK. S., KruseS. D., & Associates. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
7.
LouisK. S., & MarksH. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experience in restructured schools. American Journal of Education, 106(4), 532–575.
8.
McLaughlinM. W., & TalbertJ. E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning: Strategic opportunities for meeting the nation's education goals.Palo Alto, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School.
9.
McMahonA., BolamR., AbbottR., & HollyP. (1984). Guidelines for review and internal development in schools.New York: Longman/Schools Council.
10.
MorrisseyM. S. (2000). Professional learning communities: An ongoing exploration.Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
11.
RosenholtzS. J. (1989). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools.New York: Longman.
12.
StollL., BolamR., McMahonA., ThomasS., WallaceM., GreenwoodA. (2006). Professional learning communities: Source materials for school leaders and other leaders of professional learning.London: Department for Education and Skills.
13.
StollL., FinkD., & EarlL. (2003). It's about learning (and it's about time).London: RoutledgeFalmer.
14.
StollL., & LouisK. S. (Eds.). (in press). Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth, and dilemmas.Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill
15.
TeddlieC., & ReynoldsD. (Eds.). (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research.London: Falmer Press.
16.
ThomasS., McMahonA., SmithM., & StollL. (2005). Measuring four dimensions of professional learning communities and impact on student outcomes. Unpublished report, University of Bristol, England.
17.
WileyS. (2001). Contextual effects of student achievement: School leadership and professional community, Journal of Educational Change, 2(1), 1–33.
