In this study, we used survey research methods to examine (1) factors that motivated educators in the state of Iowa who held administrative licensure (125 females, 164 males) to actively pursue secondary principalship positions and (2) aspects that dissuaded them from applying. Respondents rated 10 factors that potentially motivated them to pursue administrative licensure, 36 factors related to perceived barriers to pursuing the principalship, and 5 questions related to perceived quality of leadership preparation. Results revealed that educators were attracted to the principalship for intrinsically motivating reasons. Although perceiving potential barriers as being only minimal-to-moderate obstacles, females identified concerns related to gender discrimination and gender stereotypes, and males were significantly more likely to apply to available positions. Respondents indicated concerns regarding time demands of the position and an emphasis on management over leadership responsibilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchillesC. M. (1988). Unlocking some mysteries of administration and administrator preparation: A reflective prospect. In GriffithsD. E., StoutR. T., & ForsythP. B. (Eds.), Leaders for America's schools: The report and papers of the National Commission on the Excellence in Educational Administration (pp. 41–67). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
2.
AustinG. R., & ReynoldsR. (1990). Managing for improved school effectiveness: An international survey. School Organization, 2, 167–178.
3.
BegleyP. T., & Campbell-EvansG. (1992). Socializing experiences of aspiring principals. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 38, 285–299.
4.
BehlingO., LabovitzG., & GainerM. (1968). College recruiting: A theoretical base. Personnel Journal, 47, 13–19.
5.
BoyerE. L. (1983). High school: A report on secondary education in America.New York: Harper & Row.
6.
BredesonP. V. (1996). New directions in the preparation of educational leaders. In LeithwoodK., ChapmanJ., CorsonD., HallingerP., & HartA. (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 251–277). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
7.
BrewerH. (2001). Ten steps to success. Journal of Staff Development, 22(1), 30–31.
8.
Browne-FerrignoT., & MuthR. (2004). Leadership mentoring in clinical practice: Role socialization, professional development, and capacity building. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 468–494.
9.
ConleyS., & LevinsonR. (1993). Teacher work redesign and job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29, 453–478.
10.
DeAngelisK. D. (2003). In the pipeline: The early career paths of administrative certificate holders in Illinois.Edwardsville, IL: Illinois Education Research Council.
11.
DiPaolaM., & Tschannen-MoranM. (2003). The principalship at a crossroads: A study of the conditions and concerns of principals. NASSP Bulletin, 87(634), 43–63.
EckmanE. W. (2004). Similarities and differences in role conflict, role commitment, and job satisfaction for female and male high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 366–387.
14.
Educational Research Service. (1998). Is there a shortage of qualified candidates for openings in the principalship?Arlington, VA: Author.
15.
Educational Research Service. (2000). The principal, keystone of a high-achieving school: Attracting and keeping the leaders we need.Arlington, VA: Author.
16.
ElseD. (1999). Principal job satisfaction and shortage survey.Cedar Falls: University of Northern Iowa.
17.
FosterW. (1988). Educational administration: A critical appraisal. In GriffithsD. E., StoutR. T., & ForsythP. B. (Eds.), Leaders for America's schools: The report and papers of the National Commission on the Excellence in Educational Administration (pp. 68–81). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
18.
FriesenD., HoldawayE. A., & RiceA. W. (1983). Satisfaction of school principals with their work. Educational Administration Quarterly, 19, 35–58.
19.
HaleE. L., & MoormanH. N. (2003). Preparing school principals: A national perspective on policy and program innovations.Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
20.
HaleR. P. (1994). Aspirations and frustrations of female secondary administrators. Professional Educator, 16(2), 45–50.
21.
HerzbergF., MausnerB., & SnydermanB. B. (1959). The motivation to work.New York: Wiley
22.
HirschE., & GroffF. (2002, January). Principals in Colorado: An inventory of policies and practices. Paper presented at the National Conference of State Legislatures, Denver, CO.
23.
IannoneR. A. (1973). What motivates principals?Journal of Educational Research, 66, 260–262.
24.
Institute for Educational Leadership. (2000). Leadership for student learning: Reinventing the principalship. A report of the Task Force on the Principal-ship.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved November 8, 2005, from http://www.iel.org/programs/21st/reports/principal.pdf
25.
Iowa Department of Education. (2004). Annual condition of education report.Des Moines, IA: Author.
26.
JordanD. W., McCauleyH. S., & ComeauxJ. B. (1994). The supply and demand trends of public school principals and administrators in southwestern Louisiana: 1993–1997. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED375525)
27.
KeppelG. (1982). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28.
KingD. (2002). The changing shape of leadership. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 61–63.
29.
KochanF. K., JacksonB. L., & DukeD. L. (Eds.). (1999). A thousand voices from the firing line: A study of educational leaders, their jobs, their preparation, and the problems they face.Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration.
30.
KochanF. K., SpencerW. A., & MatthewsJ. (1999, April). The changing face of the principalship in Alabama: Role, perceptions, and gender. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
31.
LeithwoodK. A., & MontgomeryD. J. (1986). Improving principal effectiveness: The principal profile.Toronto, Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
MalenB., MurphyM. J., & HartA. W. (1987). Restructuring teacher compensation systems: An analysis of three incentive strategies. In AlexanderK., & MonkD. H. (Eds.), Attracting and compensating teachers: Eighth annual yearbook of the American Education Finance Association (pp. 91–142). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
34.
McAdamsR. P. (1998). Who will run the schools?American School Board Journal, 185(8), 37–39.
35.
McLaughlinM. W., & YeeS. M. (1988). School as a place to have a career. In LiebermanA. (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 23–44). New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). The condition of education 2000.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
37.
National Commission on Excellence in Educational Administration. (1987). Leaders for America's schools: The report of the National Commission on Excellence in Educational Administration.Tempe, AZ: University Council for Educational Administration.
38.
New England School Development Council. (1988). Administrative shortage in New England: The evidence, the causes, the recommendations.Sudbury, MA: New England School Development Council. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED332260)
39.
NewtonR. M., GiesenJ., FreemanJ., BishopH., & ZeitounP. (2003). Assessing the reactions of males and females to attributes of the principalship. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 504–532.
40.
NogayK., & BeebeR. J. (1997). Gender and perceptions: Females as secondary principals. Journal of School Leadership, 7, 246–265.
41.
PortinB. S., ShenJ., & WilliamsR. C. (1998). The changing principalship and its impact: Voices from principals. NASSP Bulletin, 82(602), 1–8.
42.
PounderD. G. (1994). Educational and demographic trends: Implications for women's representation in school leadership. Advances in Educational Administration, 3, 135–149.
43.
PounderD. G., & MerrillR. J. (2001). Job desirability of the high school principal-ship: A job choice theory perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 27–57.
44.
PounderD. G., & YoungI. P. (1996). Recruitment and selection of educational administrators: Priorities for today's schools. In LeithwoodK., ChapmanJ., CorsonD., HallingerP., & HartA. (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 279–308). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
QuinnT. K. (2002). Redefining leadership in the standards era. Principal, 82(1), 16–20.
47.
SampsonS. N. (1987). Equal opportunity, alone, is not enough or why there are more male principals in schools these days. Australian Journal of Education, 31(1), 27–42.
48.
SchiffT. (2002). Principals’ readiness for reform: A comprehensive approach. Principal Leadership, 2(5), 21–26.
49.
SchmidtG. L. (1976). Job satisfaction among secondary school administrators. Educational Administration Quarterly, 12, 68–86.
50.
School Administrators of Iowa. (1997). The school administrator shortage: Leadership in crisis.Des Moines, IA: Author.
51.
School Administrators of Iowa & Iowa Department of Education. (1999). Iowa administrator retirement intentions study.Des Moines, IA: Iowa Department of Education.
52.
SchwabD. P., RynesS. L., & AldagR. J. (1987). Theories and research on job search and choice. In RowandK. M., & FerrisG. R. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management (pp. 129–166). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
53.
ShakeshaftC. (1989). Women in educational administration.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
54.
ShakeshaftC. (1999). The struggle to include a more gender inclusive profession. In MurphyJ., & LouisK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 99–118). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55.
SheldonT. D., & MunnichL. W.Jr. (1999, Fall). Administrative autumn: A study of Minnesota's aging educational leaders and the difficulty in finding their replacements.Minneapolis, MN: Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs. Retrieved November 8, 2005, from http://www.hhh.umn.edu/centers/slp/projects/edweb/reports/autim.pdf
56.
SutterM. R. (1996). What do we know about the job and career satisfaction of secondary school principals?NASSP Bulletin, 80(579), 108–111.
57.
TallericoM., & BurstynJ. N. (1996). Retaining women in the superintendency: The location matters. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 642–664.
58.
WatersJ. T., MarzanoR. J., & McNultyB. A. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement.Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
59.
WilliamsR. C., & PortinB. S. (1996). Challenges of school leadership: The changing role of the principal.Olympia, WA: Association of Washington School Principals.
60.
WinterP. A. (1996). Applicant evaluations of position announcements: The influence of sex, job message content, and information order. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10, 105–116.
61.
WinterP. A., & MorgenthalJ. R. (2002). Principal recruitment in a reform environment: Effects of school achievement and school level on applicant attraction to the job. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 319–340.
62.
WinterP. A., RinehartJ. S., & MuñozM. A. (2002). Principal recruitment: An empirical evaluation of a school district's internal pool of principal certified personnel. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16, 129–141.
63.
YoungI. P., RinehartJ. S., & PlaceW. (1989). Theories for teacher selection: Objective, subjective and critical contact. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 329–336.
