This study of school climate underscores the importance of the quality of interpersonal relationships in a school to student achievement. This study improves on previous studies in three ways: First, it makes use of a parsimonious school climate framework that is easier to interpret than previous measures; second, it replaces a subscale that assesses a school's success at buffering influences from its community with a measure of bridging (DiPaola & Tschannen-Moran, 2005); and third, it measures student progress using state standards of the kind required by No Child Left Behind. We provide educational leaders with a framework to gain insight into their schools’ climates and in turn make improvements within their schools as they strive to meet the benchmarks set by their states and the federal government.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonC. (1982). The search for school climate: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 368–420.
2.
BrookoverW., SchweitzerJ., BeadyC., FloodP., & WisenbakerJ. (1978). Elementary school social climate and school achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 301–318.
3.
BulachC. R., MaloneB., & CastlemanC. (1995). An investigation of variables related to student achievement. Mid-Western Educational Researcher8(2), 23–29.
4.
DiPaolaM. F., & Tschannen-MoranM. (2005). Bridging or buffering: The impact of schools’ adaptive strategies on student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 43, 60–71.
5.
EpsteinJ. L. (1987). Toward a theory of family–school connections: Teacher practices of parent involvement across the school years. In HurrelmanF. K., & LoselF. (Eds.), Social intervention: Potential and constraints (pp. 121–136). New York: de Gruyter.
6.
EpsteinJ. L. (1991). Effects on student achievement of teacher practices of parent involvement. In SilvernS. (Ed.), Literacy through family, community, and school interaction (pp. 261–276). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7.
GriffithJ. (1996). The relation of parent involvement, empowerment, and school traits to student academic performance. Journal of Educational Research, 90(1), 33–41.
8.
HallingerP., & HeckR. I. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.
9.
HalpinA. (1959). The leader behavior of school superintendents.Chicago: Midwest Administrative Center.
10.
HalpinA., & CroftD. (1962, August). The organizational climate of schools (Contract No. SAE 543–8639). Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education.
11.
HambletonR., CrockerL., CruseK., DoddB., PlakeB., & PoggioJ. (2000). Review of selected technical characteristics of the Virginia Standards of Learning (SOL) assessments.Richmond, VA: Virginia Department of Education.
12.
HendersonA. T., & MappK. L. (Eds.). (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement.Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
13.
HoyW., & FeldmanJ. (1987). Organizational health: The concept and its measure. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20(4), 30–37.
14.
HoyW., & HannumJ. (1997). Middle school climate: An empirical assessment of organizational health and student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33, 290–311.
15.
HoyW., HannumJ., & Tschannen-MoranM. (1998). Organizational climate and student achievement: A parsimonious view and longitudinal viewJournal of School Leadership, 8, 336–359.
16.
HoyW., & SaboJ. (1998). Quality middle schools open and healthy.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
17.
HoyW. K., SmithP. A., & SweetlandS. R. (2002). The development of the organizational climate index for high schools: Its measure and relationship to faculty trust. High School Journal, 86(2), 38–49.
18.
HoyW., TarterC. J., & BlissJ. (1990). Organizational climate, school health, and effectiveness: A comparative analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 260–279.
19.
HoyW., TarterC. J., & KottkampR. (1991). Open schools/healthy schools.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
JamesL., & JonesA. (1974). Organizational climate: A review of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 81(12), 1096–1112.
21.
JohannesonR. (1973). Some problems in the measurement of organizational climate. Organizational Behavior and Human Perspectives, 10, 110–144.
22.
LitwinG., & StringerR. (1968). Motivation and organizational climate.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
MilesM. (1965). Education and innovation: The organization in context. In AbbottM., & LovellJ. (Eds.), Changing perspectives in educational administration (pp. 54–72). Auburn, AL: Auburn University Press.
24.
MilesM. (1969). Planned change and organizational health. In CarverF., & SergiovanniT. (Eds), Organization and human behavior: Focus on schools (pp. 375–391). New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
ParsonsT. (1958). Some ingredients of a general theory of formal organization. In HalpinA. (Ed), Administration theory in education (pp. 40–72). New York: MacMillan.
26.
TagiuriR. (1968). The concept of organizational climate. In TagiuriR., & LitwinD. H. (Eds.), Organizational climate (pp. 11–34). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
TarterC. J., SaboD., & HoyW. (1995). Middle school climate, faculty trust, and effectiveness: A path analysis. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29, 41–49.
28.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). No Child Left Behind: ESEA reform.Washington, DC: Author.
29.
WangM. C., HaertelG. D., & WalbergH. J. (1994). What helps students learn?Educational Leadership, 51(4), 74–79.
