This article examines the ethical conundrum of educational decision makers when faced with a plethora of conflicting value-based decisions. It offers an analysis of a well-known fable as the foil to demonstrate the problematic nature of ethical relativism and postmodern ethics in resolving that conundrum while advocating the use of five core commitments that enable reasonable, consistent, and justifiable warrants for ethical choices.
DonlevyJ. K. (2004). Value pluralism and negative freedom in Canadian education: The Trinity and Surrey cases. McGill Journal of Education, 39(3), 305–324.
MasonM. (2001). The ethics of integrity: Educational values beyond postmodern ethics. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35(1), 47–70.
23.
MitchellC., SackneyL., & WalkerK. (1996). The postmodern phenomenon: Ramifications for school organizations and educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 11(1), 38–67.
24.
NoddingsN. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education.Williston, VT: Teachers College Press.
PresdeeM. (2000). Cultural criminology and the carnival of crime.New York: Routledge.
27.
RawlsJ. (1971). A theory of justice.Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
28.
SackneyL., WalkerK., & MitchellC. (1999). Postmodern conceptions of power in educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations, 14(1), 33–57.
29.
SelznickP. (2002). The communitarian persuasion.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
30.
StoutJ. (1988). Ethics after Babel: The languages of morals and their discontents.Boston: Beacon Press.