This case study explores one elementary school's 17-year evolution from a traditional Title I elementary school into a learning community and, eventually a high-achieving democratic school community. The investigation adds specificity and context to the existing theoretical framework outlining this change process. The school's journey is reflected and described through shared learning, leadership, and practices across four thematic findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllingtonR. L., & CunninghamP. M. (1996). Schools that work: Where all children read and write.New York: Harper Collins.
2.
AnfaraV. A., BrownK. M., & MangioneT. L. (2002, October). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28–38.
3.
AppleM. W., & BeaneJ. A. (Eds.). (1995). Democratic schools.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
4.
BennettC. I. (1999). Comprehensive multicultural education: Theory and practice.New York: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
CateJ. L. (2004). Evolution of a high-achieving school: Building community through learning, leading and practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Oklahoma, Norman.
6.
CrowleyK. S., & MeehanM. L. (2003, January 7–10). Student achievement gaps in high-performing schools: Differences as a function of the professional staff as a learning community. Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on Education.
GlickmanC. D. (1993). Renewing America's schools: A guide for school based action.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
GlickmanC. D. (1998). Revolutionizing America's schools.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
GoodladJ. I. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future.New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
HaycockK., JeraldC., & HuangS. (2001). Closing the gap: Done in a decade [Electronic version]. Thinking K–16, 5(2), 3–21. Retrieved November 28, 2003, from http://64.224.125.0/main/documents/k16_spring01.pdf
23.
HordS. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement.Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
24.
HordS. M. (2004). Learning together, leading together: Changing schools through professional learning communities (Critical Issues in Educational Leadership Series, 11).Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory
25.
HuffmanJ. B., & HippK. K. (2003). Reculturing schools as professional learning communities.Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
26.
HuffmanJ., HippK. A., PankakeA. M., & MollerG. (2001, September). Professional learning communities: Leadership, purposeful decision making, and job-embedded staff development. Journal of School Leadership, 11(5), 448–463.
27.
Interviews. (2002). Former and current Red Bud teachers, administrators, district leaders, and network affiliates. Southwest USA.
28.
Interviews. (2003). Current Red Bud teachers. Southwest USA.
29.
JoyceB., CalhounE., & HopkinsD. (1999). The new structure of school improvement: Inquiring schools and achieving students.Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
30.
KruseS., LouisK. S., & BrykA. S. (1994). Building professional community in schools.Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
31.
LambertL. (1998). Building leadership capacity in schools.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
32.
LambertL. (2003). Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
33.
LappeF. M., & DuBoisP. M. (1994). The quickening of America.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
LouisK. S., KruseS. D., & MarksJ. M. (1996). Schoolwide professional community. In NewmannF. (Eds.), Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 179–203). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
MarksH. M., & LouisK. S. (1999). Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organizational learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 707–750.
36.
MarksH. M., & PrintyS. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397.
37.
MerriamS. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38.
MurphyJ. (2002, April). Reculturing the profession of educational leadership: New blueprints. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(3), 176–191.
39.
NewmannF. M., & WehlageG. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators.Madison: Center on Organization and Restructuring of School, Wisconsin Center for Education Renewal, University of Wisconsin.
40.
North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (2003). Closing the achievement gaps. Retrieved November 28, 2003, from http://www.ncrel.org/gap/
O'HairM. J., & ReitzugU. C. (1997, May). Restructuring schools for democracy: Principals’ perspectives. Journal of School Leadership, 7(3), 266–286.
43.
O'HairM. J., & VeugelersW. (2005). The case for network learning. In VeugelersW., & O'HairM. J. (Eds.), Network learning for educational change (pp. 1–16). London: Open University Press.
44.
PattersonJ. A., & MarshallC. (2001). Making sense of policy paradoxes: A case study of teacher leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 11(5), 372–398.
45.
PrintyS. M. (2004). The professional impact of communities of practice. UCEA Review, 46(1), 20–23.
46.
Red Bud. (1992). Site plan. Southwest USA.
47.
Red Bud. (1996). Network notebook. Southwest USA.
48.
Red Bud. (1997). Network notebook. Southwest USA.
49.
Red Bud. (1998a). Network notebook. Southwest USA.
50.
Red Bud. (1998b). Title I award notebook. Southwest USA.
51.
Red Bud. (1999). Network notebook. Southwest USA.
52.
Red Bud. (2001). Network notebook. Southwest USA.
53.
ReitzugU. C., & O'HairM. J. (2002). From conventional school to democratic school community: The dilemmas of teaching and leadership. In Furman-BrownG. (Ed.), School as community: From promise to practice (pp. 119–141). New York: SUNY Press.
54.
SengeP. (2000). Schools that learn.New York: Doubleday.
55.
SizerT. (1985). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
56.
SizerT. (1996). Horace's hope: What works for the American high school.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
57.
SmithJ. B., LeeV. E., & NewmannF. M. (2001). Instruction and achievement in Chicago elementary schools: Improving Chicago's schools.Chicago: Consortium of Chicago School Research.
58.
SpillaneJ. P., HalversonR., DiamondJ. B. (1999). Toward a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective.Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Institute of Policy Research. Retrieved April 4, 2003, from http://www.letas.org/PDF/DLS_ipr_paper.doc
59.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
