Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2006-1
Superintendents’ Perceptions about Social Distance,Succession,and “Sunset” Provisions for Asian,Latino,and Native American Candidates Seeking Building-Level Administrator Positions 1
Research addressing the attraction and selection of individuals for administrator positions is encapsulated in a structural model that depicts different phases of the employee procurement process. Within the present study, attention is devoted to the prescreening stage of the selection process, and screening decisions of superintendents are examined for applicants varying in national origin (Asian, Latino, or Native American), chronological age (29 years old, 49 years old, or control condition), and level of administrator position sought (assistant high school principals or high school principal). Screening decisions of superintendents are cast into a 3 × 3 x 2 factorial design and a MANOVA indicates a significant interaction effect for national origin by focal positional. This finding is interpreted from a social distance perspective and alternative explanations are provided. Results suggest that only certain groups should follow the succession pattern and that a sunset provision fails to exist for these particular groups of job candidates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C.A § 621 (West 1985 and Supp. 1996).
2.
BarthR. (1990). Improving schools from within, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BogardusE. S. (1967). Measuring social distances. In FishbeinM. (Ed,), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 71–76). New York: John Wiley.
4.
BoyerE. L. (1983). High School: A report on secondary education in America.New York: Harper & Row.
5.
CableD. M., & GilovichT. (1998). Looked over or overlooked? Prescreening decisions and postinterview evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 501–508.
6.
CohenJ. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.New York: Academic Press.
MilanowskiA., OddenA., & YoungsP. (1998). Teacher knowledge and skill assessments and teacher compensation: An overview of measurement and linkage issues. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(2), 83–101.
12.
Miller-SmithK. (2001). An investigation of factors in resumes that influence the selection of teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
13.
NathanB. R., & AlexanderR. A. (1985). The role of inferential accuracy in performance ratings. Academy of Management, 10(1), 109–115.
14.
OtoT. (2003). Effects of national origin, chronological age, and locus of decision on teacher selection decision: A social distance and person-organization fit perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of California, Davis.
15.
PounderD. G., & MerrillR. J. (2001). Job desirability of the high school principal-ship: A job choice theory perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 27–57.
16.
PounderD. G., & YoungI. P. (1996). Recruitment and selection of educational administrators: Priorities for today's schools. In LeithwoodK. (Ed.) & A. W. Hart (Section Ed.), The international handbook of educational leadership (pp. 279–308). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
17.
ReisS. C., YoungI. P., & JuryJ. C. (1999). Female administrators: A crack in the glass ceiling. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(4), 71–82.
18.
RynesS., & GerhartB. (1990). Interview assessments of applicant fit: An exploratory investigation. Personnel Psychology, 43(1), 13–35.
19.
SchmittN, NoeR., MerittR., & FitzgeraldM. P. (1984). Validity of assessment center ratings for the prediction of performance ratings and school climate of school administrators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 207–213.
20.
SchmittN., & SchechtmanS. (1990). The selection of school administrators. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 3, 231–238.
21.
SiegelS. (1956). Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences.New York: McGraw-Hill.
TirozziG., & FerrandinoV. (2000, October 18). The shortage of principals continues. Education Week, 20(7), 1.
24.
WanousJ. P., & ReichersA. E. (1996). Estimating the reliability of a single-item measure. Psychological Reports, 78(2), 631–634.
25.
WeinfurtK. P. (1995). Multivariate analysis of variance. In GrimmL., & YarnnoldP. (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 245–276). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26.
WinterP. A., McCabeD. H., & NewtonR. M. (1998). Principal selection decisions made by teachers: The influence of work values, principal job attributes, and school level. Journal of School Leadership, 8, 251–279.
27.
WinterP. A., & MorgenthalJ. R. (2002). Principal recruitment in a reform environment: Effects of school achievement and school level on applicant attraction to the job. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 319–340.
28.
WinterP. A., RinehartJ. S., & MunozM. A. (2002). Principal recruitment: An empirical evaluation of a school district's internal pool of principals certified personnel. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16(2), 129–141.
29.
YoungI. P., & AllisonB. (1982). Effects of age, experience, and administrative role of administrators on teacher selection decisions. Planning and Changing, 13, 245–256.
30.
YoungI. P., & ChounetP. F. (2003). The effects of information medium and chronological age on teacher screening decisions of elementary school principals: A treatment by response interactionJournal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20, 204–215.
31.
YoungI. P., & FoxJ. A. (2002). Asian, Latino and Native American job candidates: Prescreened or screened with the selection process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(4), 530–554.
32.
YoungI. P., GallowayC., & RinehartJ. S. (1990). The effects of recruitment brochure content and gender of the reactor for doctoral programs in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 168–185.
33.
YoungI. P., & JosephG. (1989). Effects of chronological age, skill obsolescence, quality of information and focal position on evaluations of principals. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2, 355–365.
34.
YoungI. P., & RyersonD. (1986). Teacher selection: Legal, practical, and theoretical aspects. (UCEA Monograph Series). University Park, PA: University Council for Educational Administration.
