A policy implementation study1 was undertaken in 65 schools in order to explore practices and outcomes related to state policies requiring schools to establish comprehensive educational support systems and teams. The purpose of these systems and teams was to enhance the capacity of schools to support students with diverse needs in general education classrooms to the greatest extent possible. A focus of the study related to the ways in which school principals played a role in facilitating the development of effective support systems and teams. The following four themes related to school leadership emerged in schools identified as the most highly developed in their efforts to support all students: (1) fostering shared vision, planning, and decision-making processes; (2) creating collaborative structures and processes; (3) using data to make decisions about curriculum and instruction; and (4) understanding and utilizing policy to create comprehensive school and districtwide systems. Each of these themes points to potential implications for the content and approaches used in leadership preparation programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlackmoreJ. (2002, March). Leadership for socially just schooling: More substance and less style in high-risk, low-trust times. Journal of School Leadership, 12(2), 198–222.
2.
BuckL. H., PollowayE. A., Smith-ThomasA., & CookK. W. (2003). Prereferral intervention practices: A survey of state practices. Exceptional Children, 69, 349–360.
3.
CarrC. S. (2003, March). Professing educational leadership: Caring ways. Journal of School Leadership, 73(3), 220–251.
4.
ChalfantJ., & PyshM. (1989). Teacher assistance teams: Five descriptive studies on 96 teams. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 49–58.
5.
CoplandM. A. (2001, July). The reform of administrator preparation at Stanford: An analytic description. Journal of School Leadership, 11(1), 335–366.
6.
DealT., & PetersonK. (1990). Principal's role in shaping school culture.Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
7.
DenzinN. K. (1994). The art and politics of interpretation. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S., (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 500–515). London: Sage.
8.
DimmockC., & LeeC. K. (2000, Summer). Redesigning school-based curriculum leadership: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 75(4), 332–358.
9.
EvansR. (1996). The human side of school change: Reform, resistance, and the real-life problems of innovation.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
FullanM. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform.London: Falmer.
11.
FullanM. (2001). Leading in a culture of change.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
FurmanG. (Ed.). (2002). School as community: From promise to practice.New York: State University of New York Press.
13.
FurneyK. S., GodekJ., & RiggsM. (2004). Leading for the success of all students. Classroom Leadership, 7(8). Retrieved June 6, 2004, from www.ascd.org/publications/class_lead/200405
14.
FurneyK. S., HasaziS. B., Clark/KeefeK., & HartnettJ. (2003). A longitudinal analysis of shifting policy landscapes in special and general education reform. Exceptional Children, 70(1), 81–94.
15.
GartnerA., & LipskyD. K. (2000). Inclusion and school restructuring: A new synergy. In VillaR. A., & ThousandJ. S. (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education: Piecing the puzzle together (pp. 38–55). Baltimore: P. Brookes Publishing.
16.
GlesneC. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
17.
HornJ. R. (2001, July). Promoting social justice and caring in schools and communities: The unrealized potential of the cohort model. Journal of School Leadership, 1(4), 313–322.
18.
Individuals With Disabilities Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.
19.
KaneD., JohnsonP., AlnaswariS., FoxW., FurneyK. S., HasaziS. (1995). Act 230 in Vermont.Montpelier, VT: Vermont Department of Education.
20.
LeithwoodK. A., BegleyP. T., & CousinsB. (1994). Developing expert leadership in future schools.London: Falmer.
21.
LincolnY., & GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
MayrowetzD., & WeinsteinC. S. (1999). Sources of leadership for inclusive education: Creating schools for all children. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 423–449.
23.
MilesM., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
MilsteinM. M. (1993). Changing the way we prepare educational leaders: The Danforth experience.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
25.
MoustakasC. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
MurphyJ. (1993). Preparing tomorrow's school leaders: Alternative designs.University Park, PA: UCEA.
27.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.
28.
ParrishT. B. (2001). Who's paying the rising cost of special education?Journal of Special Education Leadership, 14(1), 4–12.
29.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
RiehlC. J. (2000, Spring). The principal's role in creating inclusive schools for diverse students: A review of normative, empirical, and critical literature on the practice of educational administration. Review of Educational Research, 70(1), 55–81.
32.
RiesterA. F., PurschV., & SkrlaL. (2002, May). Principals for social justice: Leaders of school success for children from low-income homes. Journal of School Leadership, 12(2), 281–305.
33.
ReynoldsM. C., WangM. C., & WalbergH. J. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and general education. Exceptional Children, 53, 391–398.
34.
SergiovanniT. J. (1994). Building community in schools.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
ThurlowM. L., NelsonJ. R., TeelucksinghE., & DraperI. L. (2001). Multicultural-ism and disability in a results-based educational system: Hazards and hopes for today's schools. In UtleyC. L., & ObiakorF. E. (Eds.), Special education, multicultural education, and school reform: Components of a quality education for learners with mild disabilities (pp. 155–172). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
36.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). Twenty-third annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Act.Washington, DC: Author.
37.
Walter-ThomasC., KorinekL., & McLaughlinV. L. (1999). Collaboration to support students’ success. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(3), 1–18.
YoungM. D., & PetersenG. J. (Eds.). (2002, April). Guest editors’ introduction: The national commision for the advancement of educational leadership preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 129–136.
