A significant relationship exists between principals’ quality at certain grade levels and student achievement on the Virginia Standards of Learning tests. A statewide study finds principals rated higher on school leadership as measured by an Interstate School Leadership Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards rubric. These schools have higher student achievement than comparable schools headed by lower rated principals controlling for socioeconomic status. Implications for increasing student achievement, developing and keeping a school achievement culture, and improving principal leadership are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchillesC. M., & PriceW. J. (2001, Winter). What is missing in the current debate about education administration (EDAD) standards!AASA Professor, 24(2), 8–13.
2.
AndersonG. L. (2001). Disciplining leaders: A critical discourse analysis of the ISLLC National Examination and Performance Standards in educational administration. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(3), 199–216.
3.
BossertS., DwyerD., RowanB., & LeeG. V. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34–64.
4.
Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning. (2003, December). The status of the teaching profession 2003.Santa Cruz, CA Author. Retrieved November 17, 2003, from www.cftl.org.
5.
Charlotte Advocates for Education. (2004, February). Role of principal leadership in increasing teacher retention. Creating a supportive environment. Retrieved November 17, 2003, from www.advocatesfored.org/principalstudy.htm.
6.
DanielsonC. (1996). Enhancing professional practice. A framework for teaching.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
7.
EdmondsR. (1979). A discussion of the literature and issues related to effective schooling.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education, Center for Urban Studies.
8.
EnglishF. W. (2000, April–June). Psst! What does one call a set of non-empirical beliefs required to be accepted on faith and enforced by authority? [Answer: A religion, aka the ISLLC standards]. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 3(2), 159–168.
9.
FarcasS., JohnsonJ., & DuffettA. (2003). Rolling up their sleeves. Superintendents and principals talk about what's needed to fix public schools. A report from Public Agenda for the Wallace Foundation. Retrieved November 17, 2003, from www.publicagenda.org/research/pdfs/rolling_up_their_sleeves.pdf
10.
HaleE. L., & MoormanH. N. (2003, September). Preparing school principals: A national perspective on policy and program innovations. Retrieved November 17, 2003, from www.iel.org/pubs/PreparingSchoolPrincipals.html.
11.
HallingerP., & HeckR. (1998, June). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191.
12.
HaycockK. (2000, Spring). No more settling for less. Thinking K–16, 4, 3–8, 10–12.
13.
IngersollR. M. (2000). Eliminating the barriers to quality teaching.Washington, DC: National Education Association; Public Agenda; U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved November 17, 2003, from www.ed.gov/inits/teachers/barriers2000/Barriers2000.doc.
14.
IngersollR. M. (2002, June). The teacher shortage: A case of wrong diagnosis and wrong prescription. NASSP Bulletin, 86(631), 16–30.
15.
Institute for Educational Leadership. (2000, October). Leadership for student learning: Reinventing the principalship. School leadership for the 21st century initiative. A report of the task force on the principalship.Washington, DC: Author.
16.
MurphyJ. (1988). Methodological, measurement and conceptual problems in the study of instructional leadership. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4(4), 290–310.
17.
MurphyJ. (2000). A response to English, F. (2000, April–June). Psst! What does one call a set of non-empirical beliefs accepted on faith and enforced by authority? [Answer: A religion, aka the ISLLC standards]. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 3(2), 159–167.
18.
PounderD. G., OgawaR. T., & AdamsE. A. (1995). Leadership as an organization-wide phenomenon: Its impact on performance. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(4), 564–588.
19.
Public Agenda. (2001). Trying to stay ahead of the game. Superintendents and principals talk about school leadership. Retrieved November 17, 2003, from www.publicagenda.org/pdfstore/PDFs/leadership.pdf
Southeast Center for Teacher Quality. (2003, August 13). Recruiting teachers for hard-to-staff schools. Solutions for the southeast and the nation.National Commission on Teaching and America's future. Retrieved November 17, 2003, from www.teachingquality.org/policy/htss.htm.
22.
ViaderoD. (2003, October 1). Analysis teases out ways principals boost learning. Education Week, 23(5), 7.
23.
WatersT., MarzanoR. J., & McNultyB. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement.Aurora: CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning. Retrieved November 17, 2003, from www.mcrel.org.
24.
WitziersB., BoskerR. J., & KrugerM. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 398–425.
