Current recommendations for achieving high-quality professional development for teachers include the creation of a professional learning community. Key to the success of this approach, however, is the role of the peer mentor or coach. This study examined the experiences and perceptions of 31 professional development coaches in order to highlight the characteristics believed to be essential for success. Results suggest that, while content expertise is perceived to be important, coaches believe that strong interpersonal skills are more critical since, without them, they are unable to use their content knowledge to facilitate changes in teachers’ practice. Suggestions for selecting and training peer coaches are included.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arizona Education Association. (2003). Professional development to improve teaching practice and student learning: A position paper.Phoenix: Arizona Education Association.
2.
BardonnerJ. (2003, Spring). Digital age literacy leader. LINK: Learning, Innovation, Networking, Knowledge, 12(2), 5.
3.
CochranB., & DeChesereJ. (1995). Teacher empowerment through cognitive coaching. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 24(5), 24–27.
4.
CostaA., & GarmstonR. J. (2002). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for Renaissance schools (2nd ed.). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
5.
GarmstonR. J. (1992). Cognitive coaching: A significant catalyst. In CostaA., BellancaJ., & FogartyR. (Eds.), If minds matter: A foreword to the future, Volume I: Rationale for change (pp. 173–186). Palatine, IL: Skylight.
GuskeyT. R. (1995). Results-oriented professional development: In search of an optimal mix of effective practices.Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL). Retrieved February 24, 2003, from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/rpl_esys/pdlitrev.htm.
9.
HallG. E., NewloveB. W., GeorgeA. A., RutherfordW. L., & HordS. M. (1991). Measuring change facilitator stages of concern: A manual for the use of the CFSoCQ Questionnaire. Greeley, CO: Center for Research on Teaching and Learning, University of Northern Colorado.
10.
JoyceB., & ShowersB. (2001). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
11.
LeeH. (2001). Enriching the professional development of mathematics teachers. ERIC Digest. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education. (ERIC Reproduction Services No. ED 465 495)
12.
LittleJ. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.
13.
McKenzieJ. (2001). Coaching for a change [electronic version]. From Now On: The Educational Technology Journal, 11(2). Retrieved March 2, 2003, from http://staffdevelop.org/coaching.html.
14.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America's children.Washington, DC: Author.
15.
National Staff Development Council (NSDC). (2001). Standards for staff development (rev. ed.). Oxford, OH: Author.
16.
PierceD., & HunsakerT. W. (1996). Professional development for the teacher, of the teacher, and by the teacher. Education, 11(1), 101–105.
17.
RingstaffC., & SandholtzJ. H. (2002). Out-of-field assignments: Case studies of two beginning teachers [electronic version]. Teachers College Record, 104(4). Retrieved February 23, 2004, from http://www.tcrecord.org.
18.
ShowersB., & JoyceB. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12–16.
19.
SkinnerM. E., & WelchF. C. (1996). Peer coaching for better teaching. College Teaching, 44(4), 153–156.
20.
SullivanS., & GlanzJ. (2000). Alternative approaches to supervision: Cases from the field. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 15, 212–235.
21.
SwaffordJ. (1998). Teachers supporting teachers through peer coaching. Support for Learning, 13(2), 54–58.
22.
U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Building bridges: The mission and principles of professional development.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved July 30, 2003, from http://www.ed.gov/G2K/bridge.html.
ValenciaS. W., & KillionJ. P. (1998). Overcoming obstacles to teacher change: Direction from school-based efforts. Journal of Staff Development, 9(2), 2–8.
25.
van ManenM. (1990). Researching lived experience.London, ONT: University of Western Ontario Press.
26.
VolkmannM. J. (1992). A study of the lived experience of two teacher-leaders in a middle school science reform project. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
