Secondary school principals confront ethical dilemmas daily. This study examined how MetLife/NASSP Secondary Principals of the Year made ethical decisions conforming to three dispositions from Standard 5 of the ISLLC Standards and if they could identify processes used to reach those decisions through Rest's Four Component Model of Moral Behavior. Using a descriptive design with a mixed methodological approach of survey research and interviews of selected respondents, state principals of the year (N = 64) were surveyed regarding selected dispositions. Quantitative results indicated that the majority of respondents made ethical decisions regarding the three dispositions tested, but analysis as to the justifications used for those decisions was inconclusive. Qualitative analysis of selected respondents indicated that Rest's four components are essential justifications for making ethical decisions. Four themes emerged from the qualitative study: courage, a philosophy of the common good, gut feelings, and difficulty in defining ethics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association of School Administrators. (n.d.) AASA'S statement of ethics for school administrators, 1996 [Electronic version]. School Administrator, 53(8). Retrieved December 1, 2002, from http://www.aasa.org/sa/oct03.htm.
2.
BeauchampT. L. (1982). Philosophical ethics: An introduction to moral philosophy.New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
BebeauM. J. (1994). Influencing the moral dimensions of dental practice. In RestJ. R. & NarvaezD. (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 121–146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
BeckL. G. (1996). Why ethics? Why now? Thoughts on the moral challenges facing educational leaders. School Administrator, 54(9), 8–11.
5.
BeckL. G., & MurphyJ. (1994). Ethics in educational leadership programs: An expanding role.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
6.
BeckL. G., & MurphyJ. (1997). Ethics in educational leadership programs: Emerging models.Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration.
7.
BeckL. W. (1970). Professions, ethics, and professional ethics. In ImmegartG. L. & BurroughsJ. M. (Eds.), Ethics and the school administrator (pp. 43–58). Danville, IL: Interstate.
8.
BlyR. (1996). The sibling society.Reading, NY: Addison-Wesley
9.
BoydD. (1992). The moral part of pluralism as the plural part of moral education. In PowerF. C. & LapsleyD. K. (Eds.), The challenge of pluralism: Education, politics, and values (pp. 141–167). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
10.
CarpenterW. (2000). Ten years of silver bullets: Dissenting thoughts on education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 383–389.
11.
DexheimerR. (1970). Administrative ethics: A study in accommodation. In ImmegartG. L. & BurroughsJ. M. (Eds.), Ethics and the school administrator (pp. 27–42). Danville, IL: Interstate.
12.
FenstermakerW. C. (1994). Superintendent decision-making: The ethical dimension. Doctoral dissertation, Temple University Dissertation Abstracts International.
13.
FosterW.P. (1988). Educational administration: A critical appraisal. In GriffithsD. E., StoutR. T., & ForsythP. B. (Eds.), Leaders for America's schools: The report and papers of the National Commission on Excellence in Educational Administration (pp. 68–81). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
14.
FrostL., MichaelW., & GuarinoA. (1997, October). The relationship between human values and moral reasoning as components of moral behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED414382)
15.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
GreenfieldW.D. (1993). Articulating values and ethics in administrator preparation programs. In CapperC. A. (Ed.), Administration in a pluralistic society (pp. 267–287). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
18.
GriffithsD. E., StoutR. T., & ForsythP. B. (Eds.). (1988). Leaders for America's schools: The report and papers of the National Commission on Excellence in Educational Administration.Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
19.
HodgkinsonC. (1996). Administrative philosophy, values and motivations in administrative life.Trowbridge, Great Britain: Redwood Books.
20.
HunterR. A. (1997). Assessing moral sensitivity in business personnel (ethics). Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, A 58/10, 3802, AAC9812137.
21.
Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC). (1996). Standards for school leaders.Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved June 19, 2000, from http://www.ccsso.org/pdfs/isllcstd.pdf
22.
JackallR. (1988). Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers.New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
KohlbergL., LevineC. G., & HewerA. (1983). Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics.Basel, NY: Karger.
24.
Koret Task Force on K-12 Education. (2003, Spring). Our schools, our future. Are we still at risk?Education Next, 9–15.
25.
LapsleyD. K. (1992). Pluralism, virtues, and the post-Kohlbergian era in moral psychology. In PowerF. C. & LapsleyD. K. (Eds.), The challenge of pluralism: Education, politics, and values (pp. 169–200). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
26.
MaxwellJ. C. (2000). Failing forward: Turning mistakes into stepping-stones for success.Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.Washington, DC: Author.
29.
NoddingsN. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics.Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
PiperT.R., GentileM. C., & ParksS. D. (1993). Can ethics be taught? Perspectives, challenges, and approaches at Harvard Business School.Boston: Harvard Business School.
31.
RestJ. R. (1994). Background: Theory and research. In RestJ. R. & NarvaezD. (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 1–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
32.
RestJ. R., with BarnettR., BebeauM., DeemerD., GetzI., MoonY., (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory.New York: Praeger.
33.
RestJ. R., & NarvaezD. (1994). Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
RolstonH.III. (1999). Genes, Genesis and God: Values and their origins in natural and human history.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
ScottG. G. (1998). Making ethical choices, resolving ethical dilemmas.St. Paul, MN: Paragon.
37.
StarrattR. J. (1991). Building an ethical school: A theory for practice in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27, 185–202.
38.
StarrattR. J. (1995). Leaders with vision: The quest for school renewal.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
39.
StrikeK. A., HallerE. J., & SoltisJ. F. (1988). The ethics of school administration.New York: Teachers College Press.
40.
TaylorC. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
ThomaS. (1994) Moral judgments and moral action. In RestJ.R. & NarvaezD. (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 199–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42.
ThomasR. M. (1996). Comparing theories of child development (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
