Public school teachers (N = 189) role-played as members of school councils making principal selection decisions by rating simulated candidates for principal vacancies. The independent variables were principal candidate job experience, candidate person characteristics, and teacher school level. The dependent variable was teacher rating of the job candidate. A three-way ANOVA detected a significant main effect (F[2, 162] = 7.34, p < .001) for candidate job experience. Teachers rated the most experienced candidates higher than the east experienced candidates, but failed to rate the medium experienced candidate higher than the least experienced candidate, or the most experienced candidate higher than the medium experienced candidate. Implications are discussed relative to the practice of teachers selecting principals, selection theory and future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnastasiA. (1976). Psychological testing (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
2.
ArveyR. D., & FaleyR. H. (1992). Fairness in selecting employees (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
BassB. M. (1990) Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial application (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
4.
BinningJ. F., & BarrettG. V. (1989). Validity of personnel decisions: A conceptual analysis of the inferential and evidential bases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 478–494.
5.
BlackmanM. C., & FenwickL. T. (2000, March 29). Looking for leaders in a time of change. Education Week, 46, 68.
6.
BossertS. T., DwyerD. C., RowanB., & LeeG. V. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34–64.
7.
BowlesB. D. (1990, February). The silent crisis in educational leadership. Education Digest, 53, 12–14.
8.
CampbellD. T., & StanleyJ. T. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9.
CastetterW. B., & YoungI. P. (2000). The human resource function in educational administration (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
10.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
CoryellH. (2001, June 12). Jefferson school district removes six principals. Courier Journal, p. A1.
12.
Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (1996). Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) standards.Washington, DC: Author.
13.
CubanL. (1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in school.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
14.
DavidJ. L. (1994). School-based decision-making: Kentucky's test of decentralization. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 706–712.
15.
DipboyeR. L. (1992). Selection interviews: Process perspectives.Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
16.
DunnetteM. D. (1966). Personnel selection and placement.Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
17.
Educational Research Service. (1998). Is there a shortage of qualified candidates for openings in the principalship? An exploratory study.Arlington, VA: Author.
18.
FenwickL. T. (2000). The principal shortage: Who will lead? [Monograph]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, The Principal's Center.
19.
FrenchJ. R. P.Jr., & RavenB. (1968). The bases of social power. In CartwrightD. & ZanderA. (Eds.), Group dynamics (3rd ed., pp. 259–269). New York: Harper & Row.
20.
GreenfieldW. D. (1995). Toward a theory of school administration: The centrality of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 61–85.
21.
HarrisB. M., MonkB. J., McIntyreK. E., & LongD. F. (1992). Personnel administration in education (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
22.
HinkleD., WiersmaW., & JursS. (1994). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
23.
HollandW. R. (1997). The high school principal and barriers to change: The need for principal credibility. NASSP Bulletin, 81(585), 94–97.
24.
Jefferson County Public Schools. (1998). Principal profile: Functions of leadership.Louisville, KY: Materials Production Department.
25.
Kentucky Department of Education. (1994). Handbook for SBDM councils.Frankfort, KY: Author.
26.
Kentucky Department of Education. (2001). Testing in Kentucky. Retrieved August 5, 2002, from http://www.kde.state.ky.us/.
KeppelG. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30.
KirkR. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral science (3rd ed.). New York: Brooks & Cole.
31.
LindleJ. C. (2000). School-based decision making. In PetroskoJ. M. & LindleJ. C. (Eds.). 2000 review of research on the Kentucky Education Reform Act (KERA) (pp. 279–305). Lexington, KY: Kentucky Institute for Education Research.
32.
LindleJ. C., & ShrockJ. (1993). School-based decision-making councils and the hiring process. NASSP Bulletin, 77(551), 71–76.
33.
LunenburgF.C., & OrnsteinA. C. (1996). Educational administration: Concepts and practices (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
34.
McAdamsR. P. (1998). Who'll run the schools? The coming administrator shortage. American School Board Journal, 29(8), 37–39.
35.
McCormickK. (1987, December). The school executive shortage: How serious is it?Education Digest, 55, 2–5.
36.
MurphyJ., & BeckL. G. (1994). Restructuring the principalship: Challenges and possibilities. In MurphyJ. & LouisK. S. (Eds.), Reshaping the principalship: Insights from transformational reform efforts.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
37.
National Association of Elementary and Secondary School Principals. (1998). Over fifty percent of the principals in America will retire in the next ten years. Principal, 70(4), 65.
38.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Digest of education statistics (U.S. Department of Education Publication No. 2001-034). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
39.
PetroskoJ. M. (2000). Assessment and accountability. In PetroskoJ. M. & LindleJ. C. (Eds.). 2000 review of research on the Kentucky Education Reform Act (KERA) (pp. 3–81). Lexington, KY: Kentucky Institute for Education Research.
40.
PodsakoffP. M., & SchriesheimC. A. (1985). Field studies of French and Raven's bases of power: Critique, reanalysis, and suggestions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 387–411.
41.
PounderD. G., & MerrillR. J. (2001). Job desirability of the high school principal-ship: A job choice theory perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 27–57.
42.
PounderD. G., & YoungI. P. (1996). Recruitment and selection of educational administrators: Priorities for today's schools. In LeithwoodK. (Ed.) & HartA. W. (Section Ed.), The international handbook for educational leadership and administration (pp. 279–308). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
43.
ReboreR. W. (2001). Human resource administration in education (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
44.
RichardsonM. D., & PrickettR. L. (1990, August). Improving principal identification and selection through school and university collaboration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration, Los Angeles. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED345334)
ShakeshaftC. (1989). Women in educational administration (Rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47.
ShoemakerJ., & FrazerH. W. (1987). What principals can do: Some implications from studies of effective schooling. In CarlsonR. & DucharmeE. (Eds.), School improvement theory and practice (pp. 131–176). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
48.
TarisT. W., & BokI. A. (1998). On gender specificity of person characteristics in personnel advertisements: A study among future applicants. Journal of Psychology, 132, 593–610.
49.
TiltonJ. W. (1937). The measurement of overlapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 28, 656–662.
50.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2000). Occupational outlook handbook, 2000–01 edition (Bulletin 2520). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
51.
Van MeterE. J. (1991). The Kentucky mandate: School-based decision-making. NASSP Bulletin, 75(532), 52–62.
52.
WatkinsP. (1991). Devolving educational administration in Victoria: Tensions in the role and selection of principals. Journal of Educational Administration, 29, 22–38.
53.
YoungI. P. (1983). Administrators’ perceptions of teacher candidates in dyad and panel interviews. Educational Administration Quarterly, 19, 46–63.
54.
YoungI. P. (1984). The effects of interpersonal performance style in simulated teacher selection interviews. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17, 43–51.
55.
YoungI. P., & AllisonB. (1982). Effects of candidate age and teaching experience on school superintendents and principals in selecting teachers. Planning and Changing, 13, 245–256.
56.
YoungI. P., & PounderD. G. (1985). Salient factors affecting decision making in simulated teacher selection interviews. Journal of Educational Equity and Leadership, 5, 216–233.
57.
YoungI. P., RinehartJ. S., & BaitsD. M. (1997). Age discrimination: Impact of chronological age and perceived demands on teacher screening decisions. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30, 103–112.
58.
YoungI. P., RinehartJ. S., & HenemanH. G.III. (1993). Effects of job attribute categories, applicant job experience, and recruiter sex on applicant job attractiveness ratings. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7, 55–66.
59.
YoungI. P., RinehartJ. S., & PlaceA. W. (1989). Theories for teacher selection: Objective, subjective, and critical contact. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 329–336.
60.
YoungI. P., & VossG. C. (1986). Administrators’ perceptions of teacher candidates: Effects of chronological age, amount of information, and type of teaching position. Journal of Educational Equity and Leadership, 6, 27–44.
