Demonstrating the contribution of leadership development programs to student learning has become a problem of considerable recent interest to both school reformers and those attempting to improve how school leaders are prepared. This article describes an innovative approach to improving school leadership developed by the Greater New Orleans School Leadership Center. Longitudinal evidence from a four-and-a-half-year external evaluation of the effects of the center program on schools and students is summarized. Promising evidence of program effects are reported using state-collected achievement data and measures of student engagement with school collected specifically for the study in each leader's school. The article highlights lessons from this case that may be of general value for others engaged in leadership preparation initiatives and their evaluation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BassB. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations.New York: Free Press.
2.
BerlinerD. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18–20.
3.
BloomB. S. (1984, May). The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Leadership, 4–17.
4.
BridgeR., JuddC., & MoockP. (1979). The determinants of educational outcomes.Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
5.
BrymanA (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Leadership.New York: Harper & Row.
7.
CaldwellB. J. (2000). Leadership in the creation of world-class schools. In RileyK. A., & LouisK. S. (Eds.), Leadership for change and school reform, London: Routledge Falmer.
8.
ColemanJ. S., CampbellE., HobsonC., McPartlandJ., MoodA., WeinfeldR. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
9.
CookT. D. (1991). Clarifying the warrant for generalized causal inferences in quasi-experimentation. In McLaughlinM., & PhillipsD. (Eds.), Evaluation and education at quarter century (pp. 115–144). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
10.
CranstonN., EhrichL., & BillotJ. (in press). The secondary school principalship in Australia and New Zealand: An investigation of changing roles. Leadership and Policy in Schools.
11.
CreemersB. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom.London: Cassell.
12.
CreemersB. P. M., & ReezigtG. J. (1996). School level conditions affecting the effectiveness of instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 197–228.
13.
DaftR. L. (1989). Organization theory and design (3rd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West.
14.
DukeD., & LeithwoodK. (1994). Management and leadership: A comprehensive view of principals’ functions.Mimeo. Toronto: OISE.
15.
FinnJ. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–143.
16.
FurtwenglerC. B., FurtwenglerW. J., HurstD., TurkR. L., & HolcombE. (1996). Preparing expert leaders: A fresh clinical model. Journal of School Leadership, 6(5), 512–539.
17.
GalbraithJ. R. (1977). Organization design.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18.
GuskeyT. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
19.
HallingerP., & HeckR. H. (1996a). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.
20.
HallingerP., & HeckR. H. (1996b). The principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of methodological issues, 1980–1995. In LeithwoodK., ChapmanJ., CorsonD., HallingerP., & Weaver-HartA. (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 723–784). New York: Kluwer.
21.
HallingerP., & HeckR. H. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 157–191.
22.
HargreavesD., & HopkinsD. (1991). The empowered school.London: Cassell.
23.
HippK. A., & BredesonP. V. (1995). Exploring connections between teacher efficacy and principals’ leadership behaviors. Journal of School Leadership, 5(2), 136–150.
LeithwoodK., & AitkenR. (1995). Making school smarter: A system for monitoring school and district progress.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
26.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (1999). Transformational school leadership effects: A replication. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4), 451–479.
27.
LeithwoodK., JantziD., CoffinG., & WilsonP. (1996). Preparing school leaders: What works?Journal of School Leadership, 6(3), 316–342.
28.
LeithwoodK., JantziD., & SteinbachR. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times.Philadelphia: Open University Press.
29.
LeithwoodK., & SteinbachR. (1995). Expert problem solving: Evidence from school and district leaders.New York: SUNY.
30.
LeitnerD. (1994). Do principals affect student outcomes: An organizational perspective. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5, 239–253.
31.
McCarthyM. M. (1999). The evolution of educational leadership preparation programs. In MurphyJ., & LouisK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 119–140). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32.
McCarthyM. M. (2002). Educational leadership preparation programs: A glance at the past with an eye toward the future. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1(3), 201–221.
33.
MortimoreP. (1993). School effectiveness and the management of effective learning and teaching. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4, 290–310.
34.
MurphyJ. (2001, March). Reculturing the profession of educational leadership: New blueprints. Paper commissioned for the first meeting of the National Commission for the Advancement of Educational Leadership Preparation, Racine, WI.
35.
MurphyJ. (2002). Reculturing the profession of educational leadership: New blueprints. In MurphyJ. (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
MurphyJ., & DatnowA. (2003). The development of comprehensive school reform. In MurphyJ., & DatnowA. (Eds.), Leadership lessons from comprehensive school reforms.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
37.
OxleyD. (1997). Theory and practice of school communities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(supplement), 624–643.
38.
PerkinsD. N., & SalomonG. (1987). Transfer and teaching thinking. In PerkinsD. N., LochheadJ., & BishopJ. (eds), Thinking: The second international conference.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
PetersonK. D. (2001, March). The professional development of principals: Innovations and opportunities. Paper commissioned for the first meeting of the National Commission for the Advancement of Educational Leadership Preparation, Racine, WI.
40.
PounderD., ReitzugU., & YoungM. (2002). Preparing school leaders for school improvement, social justice, and community. In MurphyJ. (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
ReynoldsD., SammonsP., StollL., BarberM., & HillmanJ. (1996). School effectiveness and school improvement in the United Kingdom. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 133–158.
42.
RumbergerR. W. (1983). Dropping out of high school: The influence of race, sex, and family background. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 199–220.
43.
RumbergerR. W. (1987). High school dropouts: A review of issues and evidence. Review of Educational Research, 57(2), 101–121.
44.
Scott-JonesP. (1984). Family influences on cognitive development and school achievement. In GordonE. (Ed.), Review of research in education (3rd ed., pp. 259–306). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
45.
ShavelsonR. J., PhillipsD. C., TowneL., & FeuerM. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25–28.
46.
SlavinR. E. (2003). A reader's guide to scientifically based research. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 12–16.
47.
SparksD., & HirschS. (2000). Learning to lead, leading to learn.Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
48.
van der GriftW., & HoutveenA. M. M. (1999). Educational leadership and pupil achievement in primary education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4), 373–389.
49.
Van LehnK. (1989). Problem solving and cognitive skill acquisition. In PosnerM. I. (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science.Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
50.
WalbergH. J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America's schools. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19–27.
51.
WildyH., & WallaceJ. (1995). School leadership development in western Australia: An impact study. Journal of School Leadership, 5(3), 248–271.
52.
WoffordJ. C., GoodwinV. L., & WhittingtonJ. L. (1998). Transformational and contingent reward leadership: Individual, dyad, and group levels of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 9(1), 55–84.
53.
YoungM. D., PetersonG. J., & ShortP. M. (2001, March). The complexity of substantive reform: A call for interdependence among key stakeholders. Paper commissioned for the first meeting of the National Commission for the Advancement of Educational Leadership Preparation, Racine, WI.
