This article describes the application and outcomes of using a shared framework and vocabulary for understanding learning, the Let Me Learn Process, to create a relational space necessary for constructivist learning. Students in an urban leadership preparation program learned about their own and each other's unique learning patterns and participated in activities integrating understanding of the influence of learning patterns with course content. This allowed them to come together in a relational space of shared understanding where they could make new meaning of learning, schooling, and leadership. At the end of 1 year, candidates described the influence of their participation in knowledge construction in the relational space. They also revealed their growing awareness of the role of constructivist leadership in the facilitation of school communities where all students achieve at the highest levels and prepare for democratic participation in their communities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArgyrisC., & SchonD. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3.
BarthR. (1988). School: A community of leaders. In LiebermanA. (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools.New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
BarthR. (2001). Learning by heart.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BerkL., & WinslerA. (1995). Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education, Vol. 7 of the NAEYC Research into Practice series. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
6.
BogdanR. C., & BiklenS. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
BrookfieldS. (1999). Discussion as a way of teaching. Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
BrooksJ. G., & BrooksM. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms.Alexandria VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
9.
BrunerJ. S., GoodnowJ. J., & AustinG. A. (1956). A study of thinking.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
ClarkC. M., & PetersonP. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), AERA handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255–296). New York: Macmillan.
11.
CohnM. M., & KottkampR. B. (1993). Teachers: The missing voice in education.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
12.
CooperJ. E. (2002). Constructivist leadership: Its evolving narrative. InThe constructivist leader (2nd ed.) New York: TC Press.
13.
DeweyJ. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education.Old Tappan, NJ: Macmillan.
14.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education.New York: Macmillan.
15.
GlickmanC. D. (1993). Renewing America's schools: A guide for school-based action.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
GoldringE., & GreenfieldW. (2002). Understanding the evolving concept of leadership in education: Roles, expectations, and dilemmas. In MurphyJ. (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century.Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
17.
GoodladJ. (1987). The ecology of school renewal.Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
18.
JohnstonC. A. (1996). Unlocking the will to learn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
19.
JohnstonC. A. (1998). Let me learn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
20.
JohnstonC. A. (2000). A personal guide to implementing the Let Me Learn Process.Pittsgrove, NJ: Let Me Learn, Inc.
21.
JohnstonC. A., & DaintonG. (1997). The learning combination inventory.Pittsgrove, NJ: Let Me Learn, Inc.
22.
KaganD. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27, 65–90.
23.
KottkampR., & SilverbergR. (1998, April). Mental models of administrative aspirants. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
24.
LambertL. (2002). Toward a deepened theory of constructivist leadership. The constructivist leader (2nd ed.) New York: TC Press.
LiebermanA. (Ed.) (1988). Building a professional culture in schools.New York: Teachers College Press.
27.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
MedwayF. J. (1979). Causal attributions for school-related problems: Teacher perceptions and teacher feedback. Journal of educational psychology, 71(6), 809–818.
29.
MezirowJ. & Associates. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.
NisbettR., & RossL. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31.
OstermanK., & KottkampR. (1993). Reflective practice for educators: Improving schooling through professional development.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
32.
SengeP. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.New York: Doubleday.
33.
SengeP., KleinerA., RobertsC., RossR. B., SmithB. J. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook.New York: Doubleday.
34.
SilverbergR. (2002). From marginalization to relational space: A descriptive study of teachers who changed their assumptions and beliefs about problematic students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY.
35.
SzaboM., & LambertL. (2002). The preparation of new constructivist leaders. The constructivist leader (2nd ed.) New York: TC Press.
