Claims of an insufficient supply of superintendents and conclusions about the underlying causes of this condition have been widely accepted by policymakers, professors, and practitioners. As a result, professional preparation and licensure have already been altered in some states. Economist perspectives of occupational shortages, the causes of dwindling applicant pools, and job turnover and exits are used to demonstrate that this problem has been framed incorrectly—an error spawning questionable policy decisions. The argument is made that the long-standing practice of overproducing administrators and then allowing employers to determine competence is not indicative of a true profession. Recommendations are made to strengthen preparation and licensing requirements and to improve working conditions and salaries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AuriemmaF., CooperJ., & SmithT. (1992). Graying teachers: A report on state pension systems and school district early retirement incentives. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 347 620)
2.
Back to school. (2001, December 28). Editorial. Columbus Dispatch, p. A18.
3.
BlankD. M., & StiglerG. J. (1957). The demand and supply of scientific personnel.New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
4.
ChanceE. W., & CappsJ. L. (1992). Superintendent instability in small-rural schools: The school board perspective. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 121)
5.
CooperB. S., FusarelliL. D., & CarellaV. A. (2000). Career crisis in the superintendency? The results of a national survey.Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
6.
CoxE. P., & MaloneB. G. (2001). Making the right choice: What board presidents say about hiring a superintendent. American School Board Journal, 188(7), 40–41.
7.
CunninghamW. G., & BurdickG. R. (1999). Empty offices. American School Board Journal, 186(12), 25–26, 27–30.
8.
CunninghamW. G., & SperryJ. B. (2001). Where's the beef in administrator pay?School Administrator, 58(2), 32–36.
9.
Darling-HammondL. (1994). Who will speak for the children? How “Teach for America” hurts urban schools and students. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(1), 21–34.
10.
DlugoshL. L. (1994–95). The moving puzzle: School size, politics, and superintendent tenure. Rural Educator, 16(2), 16–20.
11.
EsparoL. J., & RaderR. (2001). The leadership crisis: The shortage of qualified superintendents is not going away. American School Board Journal, 188(5), 46–48.
12.
FinnC. E. (2002, February 20). Politics, bureaucracy hamper school leaders. Dayton Daily News, p. 8A.
13.
FrankeW., & SobelI. (1970). The shortage of skilled technical workers.Lexington, MA: Heath-Lexington Books.
14.
GilesD. E., & GilesS. (1990). Where do all the superintendents go? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 326 938)
15.
GlassT. E. (1992). The study of the American school superintendency: America's education leaders in a time of reform.Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
16.
GlassT. E. (2001a). State education leaders view the superintendent applicant crisis.Denver: Education Commission of the States.
17.
GlassT. E. (2001b). The superintendent crisis: A review by search consultants.Denver: Education Commission of the States.
18.
GlassT., BjörkL., & BrunnerC. (2000). The 2000 study of the American school superintendency.Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
19.
GoodenJ. S., & LearyP. A. (1995). The status of alternative certification for school administrators: A national study. Journal of School Leadership, 5(4), 316–333.
20.
GradyM. L., & BryantM. T. (1991). A study of frequent superintendent turnover in a rural school district: The constituents’ perspective. Journal of Rural and Small Schools4(3), 10–13.
21.
Indiana State Teachers’ Retirement Fund. (2001). Active members handbook 2001.Indianapolis: Author.
22.
IngersollR. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.
23.
KowalskiT. J. (1995). Keepers of the flame: Contemporary urban superintendents.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
24.
KowalskiT. J. (1999). The school superintendent: Theory, practice, and cases.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice-Hall.
25.
KowalskiT. J. (2001). The future of local school governance: Implications for board members and superintendents. In BrunnerC. C., & BjörkL. G. (Eds.), The new superintendency: Advances in research and theories in school management and educational policy (Vol. 6) (pp. 183–204). Oxford, England: JAI.
26.
KowalskiT. J., & RauschL. (2001, February). Exits from the superintendency in Indiana: Frequency, causes, and outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of School Administrators, Orlando.
27.
KowalskiT. J., & SweetlandS. R. (2001, October). A comparative analysis of school administrator public retirement systems. Paper presented at the Midwest Education Research Association, Chicago.
28.
McAdamsR. P. (1998). Who'll run the schools?American School Board Journal, 185(8), 37–39.
29.
McCarthyM., KuhG., & ZentA. (1981). Investigation of supply and demand of school administrators in six states between 1975–76 and 1979–80. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 210 798)
30.
NataleJ. A. (1991). Early retirement plans blow in on the recession's ill wind. American School Board Journal, 178(8), 30.
31.
O'ConnellR. W. (2000). A longitudinal study of applicants for the superintendency. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 452 590)
32.
RenchlerR. (1992). Urban superintendent turnover: The need for stability. Urban Superintendents’ Sounding Board, 1(1), 1–2.
33.
RohnC. (2001, August). Superintendent shortage. Perception or reality? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration, Houston.
34.
ShapiroM. (1993). Who will teach for America?Washington, DC: Farragut.
35.
ShiblesM. R., & TirozziG. N. (1995). The school superintendency in Connecticut's schools: An introductory analysis and preliminary standards. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 9(4), 411–428.
36.
South Carolina Retirement System. (2001). Defined benefit plan details.Columbia, SC: Author. Retrieved August 15, 2001, from http//www.scrs.state.sc.us
37.
SpeerT. L. (1996). The color of money. Executive Educator, 18(7), 17–20.
38.
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio. (2000). Service retirement and plans of payment, 2000–2001.Columbus, OH: Author.
39.
SwansonA. D., & KingR. A. (1997). School finance: Its economics and politics (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
40.
TwombleyS., & EbmeierH. (1989). Educational administration programs: The cash cow of the university? Improving the preparation of school administrators. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 314 828)
41.
TyackD. B. (1974). The one best system.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Urban School Superintendents. (2000). Characteristics, tenure, and salary. Second biennial survey. Urban Indicator, 52(2), 1–9.
43.
VeneriC. M. (1999, March). Can occupational labor shortages be identified using available data?Monthly Labor Review, 122(3), 15–21.
44.
WirtF. M., & KirstM. W. (1997). The political dynamics of American education.Berkeley, CA: McCuthcan.
45.
YeeG., & CubanL. (1996). When is tenure long enough? A historical analysis of superintendent turnover and tenure in urban school districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 615–641.
