ChanceE. W., & CappsJ. L. (1992). Superintendent instability in small-rural schools: The school board perspective. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 121)
3.
CooperB. S., FusarelliL. D., & CarellaV. A. (1999). Superintendents’ professional expectations and advancement review (SPEAR) survey.New York: Fordham University/Authors.
4.
CooperB. S., FusarelliL. D., & CarellaV. A. (2000). Career crisis in the superintendency? The results of a national survey.Arlington VA: American Association of School Administrators.
5.
Council of Great City Schools. (1999). Urban school superintendents: Characteristics, tenure, and salary. Retrieved April 20, 2001, from wwwcgsc.org/reports/home/superintendents.htm
6.
CubberlyE. (1922). Public school administration.New York: Houghton-Mifflin.
7.
DaleyS. (1990). School chiefs dropping out, plagued by urban problems. New York Times, p. B4.
8.
DlugoshL. L. (1994–95). The moving puzzle: School size, politics, and superintendent tenure. Rural Educator, 16(2), 16–20.
9.
Education Research Service. (1998). Is there a shortage of qualified candidates for openings in the principalship? Retrieved April 20, 2001, from www.naesp.org/misc/shortage.htm
10.
ForsythP. (1999). The work of the UCEA. In MurphyJ., & ForsythP. (Eds.), Educational administration: A decade of reform (pp. 71–92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
11.
GlassT. E. (1992). The study of the American school superintendency: America's education leaders in a time of reform.Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
12.
GlassT., BjörkL., & BrunnerC. C. (2000). The study of the American superintendency 2000: A look at the superintendent in the new millennium.Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators; Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
13.
GroffF. (2001). Who will lead? The principal shortage. State Legislatures, 27(9), 16–18.
14.
KowalskiT. J. (1995). Keeper of the flame: Contemporary urban superintendents.Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin.
15.
KowalskiT. J. (2003). Superintendent shortage: The wrong problem and wrong solutions. Journal of School Leadership, 13(3), 288–303.
16.
McKayJ., & GradyM. (1994). Turnover at the top. Executive Educator, 16, 37–38.
17.
National Association of Elementary and Secondary Principals. (1998). Over fifty-percent of the principals in America will retire in the next ten years. Principal, 70(4), 65.
18.
RenchlerR. (1992). Urban superintendent turnover: The need for stability. Urban Superintendents’ Sounding Board, 1(1), 1–2.
19.
RistM. (1991, December). Race, politics, and policies rip into the urban superintendency. Executive Educator, 12(12), 12–14.
20.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2000). Occupational outlook handbook, 2000–2001 edition (bulletin 2520).Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.