In this exploratory, qualitative study, we considered in-depth interviews with two female and two male European American school leaders, one of each gender who were “closeted” in their sexuality and one of each who were “open.” Foucault's sovereign and disciplinary power and normalization conceptually framed the study. Their fear of disclosure resulted in reproducing heteronormative power. At the same time, all four used their sovereign power to take a stand against homophobia in their settings, though the explicitly out principal took much more direct action than the closeted leaders.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ. M. (1989, January 3). For many gay teenagers, torment leads to suicide tries. Boston Globe, 1, 8.
2.
BawerB. (1993). A place at the table: The gay individual in American society.Touchstone: New York.
3.
BlountJ. (1994). One postmodern feminist perspective on educational leadership: An, ain't I a leader? In MaxcyS. J. (Ed.), Postmodern school leadership (pp. 47–60). Westport, CT: Praeger.
4.
BlountJ. (1996). Manly men and womanly women: Deviance, gender role polarization, and the shift in women's school employment, 1900–1976. Harvard Educational Review, 66(2), 318–338.
5.
BlountJ. (1998). Destined to rule the schools: Women and the superintendency, 1873–1995.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
6.
BlountJ. (2003, January). Homosexuality and school superintendents: A brief history. Journal of School Leadership13(1).
7.
BridgesD. (1998 August). Educational research: Pursuit of truth or flight into fancy? Article presented at the British Educational Research Association annual conference, Belfast.
8.
CapperC. A. (1994). “We're not housed in an institution, we're housed in the community”: Possibilities and consequences of neighborhood-based interagency collaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(3), 237–277.
9.
CapperC. A. (1998). Critically oriented and postmodern perspectives: Sorting out the differences and applications for practice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 354–379.
10.
CapperC. A. (1999). (Homo)sexualities, organizations, and administration: Possibilities for in(queer)y. Educational Researcher, 28(5), 4–11.
11.
ConradC., HaworthJ. G., & MillarS. B. (Ed.) (1993). Qualitative research in higher education: Expanding perspectives (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press.
12.
EpsteinD., & JohnsonR. (1998). Schooling sexualities.Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
13.
EvansK. (1999). “Are you married?”: Examining heteronormativity in schools. Multicultural Perspectives, 1(3), 7–13.
14.
FoucaultM. (1975). Discipline and punish.New York: Vintage Books.
15.
FrenchJ. R. P., & RavenB. H. (1968). The bases of social power. In CartwrightD., & ZanderA. (Eds.), Group Dynamics. (pp. 259–269), New York: Harper & Row.
16.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.Chicago: Aldine.
17.
GlesneC.P.A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction.New York: Longman.
18.
GriffinP. (1992). From hiding out to coming out: Empowering lesbian and gay educators. InComing out of the classroom closet (pp. 167–196). New York: Haworth.
19.
GroganM. (2000). Laying the groundwork for a reconception of the superintendency from feminist postmodern perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 117–142.
20.
HallM. (1989). Private experiences in the public domain: Lesbians in organizations. In HearnJ., SheppardD. L., Tancred-SheriffP., & BurrellG. (Eds.), The sexuality of organization (pp. 125–138). London: Sage.
21.
HamiltonD. (1989). Towards a theory of schooling.Philadelphia: Falmer.
22.
HarbeckK. (1997). Gay and lesbian educators: Personal freedoms, public constraints.Malden, MA: Amethyst.
23.
HarbeckK. (Ed.) (1992). Coming out of the classroom closet: Gay and lesbian students, teachers, and curricula.New York: Haworth.
24.
HerekG. M. (1984). “Beyond homophobia”: A social psychological perspective on attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 10(1/2), 1–21.
25.
KaragiannisA. (1999). The prophecy of the kallikak: “Disability” in postmodern schools. Journal of Educational Administration & Foundations, 13(2), 11–26.
26.
KissenR. M. (1996). The last closet: The real lives of lesbian and gay teachers.Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
27.
KristevaJ. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection.New York: Columbia University Press.
28.
LamagdelineD. R., & KramerB. H. (1998). Transgression and forgiveness in an international school: A nonmodern case study. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 427–455.
29.
LopezG. R., GuajardoM. A., & ScheurichJ. J. (1998). Windows/ventanas: A postmodern representation of children in migrancy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 397–426.
30.
MaxwellJ. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
McKinneyJ. R., & GarrisonJ. W. (1994). Postmodernism and educational leadership: The new and improved panopticon. In MaxcyS. J. (Ed.), Postmodern school leadership (pp. 45–85). Westport, CT: Praeger.
32.
MironL., & ElliotR. (1994). Moral leadership in a poststructural era. In MaxcyS. J. (Ed.), Postmodern school leadership (pp. 133–140). Westport, CT: Praeger.
33.
NarayanK. (1993). How native is a native anthropologist?American Anthropologist, 95, 671–684.
34.
PalmerP. (2000). Let your life speak: Listening to the voice of vocation.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
PhinneyJ. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 499–514.
36.
RouseJ. (1987). Knowledge and power: Toward a political philosophy of science.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
37.
SackneyL., & WalkerK. (1999). Postmodern conceptions of power for educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations, 14(1), 33–57.
38.
ScheurichJ. (1994). Social relativism: A postmodernist epistemology for educational administration. In MaxcyS. J. (Ed.), Postmodern school leadership (pp. 17–46). Westport, CT: Praeger.
39.
SearsJ. (1996). A research agenda on gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender administrators: What can we learn from the research on women administrators, administrators of color, and homosexual teachers and youth?New York: American Educational Research Association.
SpearsL. (Ed.) (1998). Insights on leadership: Service, stewardship, spirit, and servant-leadership.New York: Wiley.
42.
SpringJ. (2000). The American school 1642–2000.New York: McGraw-Hill.
43.
ThompsonC. M. (2000). The congruent life: Following the inward path to fulfilling work and inspired leadership.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44.
WeedonC. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory.New York: Blackwell.
45.
WoodsS. E., & HarbeckK. (1992). Living in two worlds: The identity management strategies used by lesbian physical educators. In HarbeckK. (Ed.), Coming out of the classroom closet: Gay and lesbian students, teachers and curricula (pp. 38–52). Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park Press.
