An Examination of School Board Presidents’ Perceptions of Their Superintendent's Interpersonal Communication Competence and Board Decision Making

Abstract

Using research focused on interpersonal communication theory, this exploratory investigation examined school board presidents’ perceptions of their district superintendent's interpersonal communication competence in his or her role as chief executive officer and advisor to the board of education. Interpersonal communication theory suggests empathy, listening, and versatility are effective and compelling elements of persuasion. Specifically we investigated the attitudes and opinions as well as the covariance between the board of education president and their view of the district superintendent's interpersonal communication competence and its influence on school board voting decisions. Results from the investigation suggest that board decision making is closely related to the attributes of empathy, listening, self-disclosure, the absence of social anxiety, and versatility. Further, a statistically significant relationship was discovered between the overall interpersonal communication competence of the district superintendent and the support of board members on board agenda issues that have immediate consequences on the actual school system.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison

D. J.

(1991). Pride and privilege: The development of the school superintendency in the United States and Canada. In Leithwood

, & Musella

(Eds.), Understanding school system administration (pp. 209–238). London: Falmer.

Allison

D. J.

, Allison

P. A.

, & McHenry

H. A.

(1995). Chiefs and chairs: Working relationships between effective CEOs and board of education chairpersons. In Leithwood

Kenneth

(Ed.), Effective school district leadership: Transforming politics into education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Berg

J. H.

(1996, January). Context and perception: Implications for leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 6, 75–98.

Blase

(1993). The micropolitics of effective school-based leadership: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(2), 142–163.

Blumberg

(1985, September). A superintendent must read the board's invisible job description. American School Board Journal, 172(9), 44–45.

Blumberg

, & Blumberg

(1985). The school superintendent living with conflict. New York: Teachers College Press.

Boyd

W. L.

(1976, May). The public, the professionals, and educational policy: Who governs? Teachers College Record, 77(4), 539–578.

Bratlein

M. J.

, & Walters

D. L.

(1999). The superintendency: Preparing for multidimensional roles in complex and changing environments. In Kochan

F. K.

, Jackson

B. L.

, & Duke

D. L.

(Eds.), A thousand voices for the firing line (pp. 87–102). Columbia, MO: University for Educational Administration.

Brunner

C. C.

(1986). Female superintendents: Strategies for success. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(2), 160–182.

10.

Campbell

D. W.

, & Greene

(1994). Defining the leadership role of school boards in the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(5), 391–395.

11.

Carpenter

D. C.

(1987, April). Minnesota superintendents’ perceptions of their role and influence in school board agenda setting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of School Administrators, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 342 049).

12.

Carter

G. R.

, & Cunningham

W. G.

(1997). The American superintendent: Leading in an age of pressure. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

13.

Carter

D. G.

, Glass

T. E.

, & Hord

S. M.

(1993). Selecting, preparing and developing the school district superintendent. Washington DC: Falmer.

14.

Carver

(1997). Boards that make a difference: A new design for leadership in nonprofit and public organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

15.

Castilla

(1994, January). At the helm. American School Board Journal, 181(1), 22–24.

16.

Cooper

, & Croyle

R. T.

(1984). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 395–426.

17.

Crowson

(1987). The local school district superintendency: A puzzling administrative role. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(3), 49–69.

18.

Cuban

(1985). Conflict and leadership in the superintendency. Phi Delta Kappan, 67(1), 28–30.

19.

Cuban

(1976). Urban school chiefs under fire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

20.

Danzberger

J. P.

(1993). Governing the nation's schools: The case for restructuring local school boards. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(5), 367–373.

21.

Danzberger

J. P.

, Kirst

M. W.

, & Usdan

M. D.

(1992). Governing public schools: New times new requirements. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.

22.

Deem

, Brehone

, & Heath

(1995). Active citizenship and the governing of schools. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

23.

Everhart

R. B.

(1991). Unraveling the micropolitical mystiques: Some methodological opportunities. Education and Urban Society, 23(4), 455–464.

24.

Feistritzer

C. E.

(1992). A profile of school board presidents. In First

P. F.

, and Walberg

H. J.

(Eds.), School boards: Changing local control (pp. 125–147). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.

25.

Feuerstein

, & Opfer

V. D.

(1998, July). School board chairmen and school superintendents: An analysis of perceptions concerning special interest groups and educational governance. Journal of School Leadership, 8, 373–398.

26.

Glass

T. E.

(1992). The 1992 study of the American school superintendency: America's education leaders in a time of reform. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

27.

Glass

T. E.

, Björk

, & Brunner

C. C.

(2000). The 2000 study of the American school superintendency: A look at the superintendent of education in the new millennium. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

28.

Goldhammer

(1964). The school board. New York: Center for Applied Research in Education.

29.

Grady

, & Bryant

(1991). School board presidents tell why their superintendents fail. Executive Educator, 13(5), 24–25.

30.

Greene

K. R.

(1992). Models of school board policy-making. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(2), 220–236.

31.

Grogan

(1996). Voices of women aspiring to the superintendency. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

32.

Grogan

, & Henry

(1995). Women candidates for the superintendency: Board perspectives. In Irby

, & Brown

(Eds.), Women as school executives: Voices and visions (pp. 164–175). Austin, TX: Texas Council for Women School Executives.

33.

Henkin

A. B.

(1993, October). Social skills of superintendents: A leadership requisite in restructured schools. Educational Research Quarterly, 16(4), 15–30.

34.

Hentges

J. T.

(1986, Summer). The politics of superintendent-school board linkages: A study of power, participation, and control. ERS Spectrum, 4(3), 23–32.

35.

Holdaway

E. A.

, & Genge

(1995). How effective superintendents understand their work. In Leithwood

(Ed.), Effective school district leadership: Transforming politics into education (pp. 13–32). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

36.

Hoy

W. K.

, Tarter

C. J.

, & Bliss

J. R.

(1990). Organizational climate, school health, and effectiveness: A comparative analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(3), 260–279.

37.

Hoyle

(1989). Preparing the 21st-century superintendent. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(5), 376–379.

38.

Iannaccone

(1991). Micropolitics of education: What and why? Education and Urban Society, 23(4), 465–471.

39.

Iannaccone

, & Lutz

F. W.

(1970). Politics, power and policy: The governing of local school districts. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

40.

Iannaccone

, & Lutz

F. W.

(1994). The crucible of democracy: The local arena. Journal of Education Policy, 9(5-6), 39–52.

41.

Institute for Educational Leadership. (1986). School boards: Strengthening grassroots leadership. Washington, DC: Author.

42.

Johnson

P. E.

, & Payne

(1997, January). Power, communicator styles, and conflict management styles: A web of interpersonal constructs for the school principal. International Journal of Educational Reform, 6(1), 40–53.

43.

Konnert

W. M.

, & Augenstein

J. J.

(1995). The school superintendency: Leading education into the 21st century. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing.

44.

Kouzes

J. M.

, & Posner

B. Z.

(1995). The leadership challenge: How to keep getting extraordinary things done in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

45.

Kowalski

T. J.

(1999). The school superintendent: Theory, practice and cases. Upper Saddle River, NJ.: Prentice-Hall.

46.

Leithwood

(1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498–518.

47.

Leithwood

, Begley

P. T.

, & Cousins

J. B.

(1992). Developing expert leadership for future schools. London: Falmer.

48.

Lutz

(1977). Methods and conceptualizations of political power in education. In Scribner

(Ed.), The politics of education. The seventy-sixth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II, pp. 30–49). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

49.

Lutz

F. W.

, & Gresson

(1980). Local school boards as political councils. Educational Studies, 112(2), 125–144.

50.

March

J. G.

(1978). American public school administration: A short analysis. School Review, 86(2), 217–250.

51.

Marshall

, & Scribner

J. D.

(1991, August). It's all political: Inquiry into the micropolitics of education. Education and Urban Society, 23(4), 347–355.

52.

McCarty

D. J.

, & Ramsey

C. E.

(1971). The school managers. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

53.

McCurdy

J. M.

(1992). Building better board-administrator relations. Arlington: American Association of School Administrators (AASA).

54.

McNeill

, & Snavely

W. B.

(1983). Job-related stressors: A scale analysis. Midwest Academy of Management Proceedings, 235–246.

55.

Merz

C. S.

(1986). Conflict and frustration for school board members. Urban Education, 20, 397–418.

56.

Miles

M. B.

, & Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

57.

Murphy

(1990). The educational reform movement of the 1980s: A comprehensive analysis. In Murphy

(Ed.), The reform of American public education in the 1980s: Perspectives and cases. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

58.

Murphy

(1999). The quest for a center: Notes on the state of the profession of educational leadership. [Monograph] (pp. 1–88). Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration.

59.

Norton

(1983). Communicator style: Theory, applications, and measures. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

60.

Norton

M. S.

, Webb

L. D.

, Dlugosh

L. L.

, & Sybouts

(1996). The school superintendency: New responsibilities new leadership. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

61.

Nowakowski

, & First

P. F.

(1989, Winter). A study of school board minutes: Records of reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(4), 389–404.

62.

Nygren

(1992, July). Two-party tune up. American School Board Journal, 178(7), 35.

63.

Odden

A. R.

(1995). Educational leadership for America's schools. New York: McGraw-Hill.

64.

Pedhazur

E. J.

(1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction. (3rd ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace & Company.

65.

Petersen

G. J.

, & Short

P. M.

(2001, October). The school board president's perception of the district superintendent: Applying the lenses of social influence and social style. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(4), 533–570.

66.

Renchler

(1992, Winter). Urban superintendent turnover: The need for stability. Urban Superintendents’ Sounding Board, 1(1), 2–13.

67.

Rinehart

J. S.

, Short

P. M.

, Short

R. J.

, & Eckley

(1998, December). Teacher empowerment and principal leadership: Understanding the influence process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(supplement), 630–649.

68.

Scribner

, & Englert

(1977). The politics of education: An introduction. In Scribner

(Ed.), The politics of education. The seventy-sixth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II, pp. 1–29). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

69.

Shakeshaft

(1989). Women in educational administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

70.

Shannon

T. A.

(1992). Local control and “organizacrats.” In First

P. F.

, and Walberg

H. J.

(Eds.), School boards: Changing local control (pp. 27–37). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.

71.

Snavely

W. B.

(1981). The impact of social style upon person perception in primary relationships. Communication Quarterly, 2, 132–143.

72.

Snavely

W. B.

, & Clatterbuck

G. W.

(1980, November). The impact of social style on person perception and attraction across three relational contexts. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association. New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 203 413).

73.

Snavely

W. B.

, & Walters

E. V.

(1983, Fall). Differences in communication competence among administrator social style. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 11(2), 120–135.

74.

Stevens

(1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.

75.

Stewart

(1991). Chairmen and chief executives: An exploration of their relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 28(5), 511–527.

76.

Sullivan

D. L.

(1977). Explorations in stylistic interpersonal communication: A conceptual framework and an empirical strategy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska. (University Microfilms No. 77-23, 162).

77.

Tallerico

(1989, July). The dynamics of superintendent-school board relationships: A continuing challenge. Urban Education, 24(2), 215–232.

78.

Tallerico

(2000). Accessing the superintendency: The unwritten rules. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

79.

Tucker

H. J.

, & Zeigler

L. H.

(1980). Professionals and the public: Attitudes, communication, and response in school districts. New York: Longman.

80.

Usdan

, McCloud

, Podmostko

, & Cuban

(2001, February). Leadership for learning: Restructuring school district leadership. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.

81.

Walters

M. E.

(1981). Social style and interpersonal communication competence in the public school superintendency. Dissertation Abstracts International, 41(7), 2887A.

82.

Weeres

J. B.

(1971). School-community conflict in a large urban school system. Administrator Notebook, 19(9), 1–4.

83.

Yukl

(1994). Leadership in organizations (3rd ed.). New York: Prentice-Hall.

84.

Zeigler

L. H.

(1975). School board research: The problems and the prospects. In Cistone

P. J.

(Ed.), Understanding school boards (pp. 3–16). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

85.

Zeigler

L. H.

, & Jennings

M. H.

, & Peak

G. W.

(1974). Governing American schools: Political interaction in local school districts. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.

86.

Zeigler

L. H.

, Tucker

H. J.

, & Wilson

L. A.

(1977). Communication and decision making in American public education: A longitudinal and comparative study. In Scribner

J. D.

(Ed.), The politics of education: The seventy-sixth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II, pp. 218–254). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.