Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

What is an “ideal teacher”? To what extent do teachers meet this ideal? What recommendations do students have for their teachers? How can the dialogue between teachers and students be stimulated? These questions were posed by a secondary school in the Netherlands to its students. The school wanted to more actively involve students in the evaluation of teaching and wanted to improve communication between students and teachers. The results of our study of this effort highlighted the need for information about students’ views about teachers, teaching, and schooling; for the development of instruments for recording the students’ views; and for procedures with which communication between teachers and students might be improved.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Apple

M. W.

(1993). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York: Routledge.

Apple

M. W.

, & Beane

J. A.

(Eds.) (1995). Democratic schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Bandura

(Ed.). (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Beck

, Giddens

, & Lash

(1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Brekelmans

, & Wubbels

(1994). Veranderingen van het Interpersoonlijk Gedrag van Docenten gedurende hun Beroepsloopbaan (Changes in interpersonal behavior of teachers during their career). Pedagogische Studiën, 71, 242–255.

Cohen

E. G.

(1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35.

Compernolle

T. H. L.

(1987). Stress op de Middelbare School (Stress in secondary education). Amsterdam: Thesis University of Amsterdam.

Darling-Hammond

(1997). The right to learn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

de Winter

(1997). Het alziend oog van de leerling. (The all-seeing eye of the student). Utrecht: Trouw.

10.

Dieleman

, & Van der Lans

(Eds). (1999). Heft in eigen handen. (Life in your own hands). Assen: Van Gorcum.

11.

Giroux

H. A.

(1989). Schooling for democracy: Critical pedagogy in the modern age. London: Routledge.

12.

Goodman

(1992). Elementary schooling for critical democracy. New York: Suny.

13.

Hargreaves

(1994). Changing teachers, changing times. London: Cassell.

14.

Jackson

P. W.

, Boostrom

R. E.

, & Hansen

D. T.

(1993). The moral life of schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

15.

McLaren

(1994). Life in schools. New York: Longman.

16.

O'Hair

M. J.

, McLaughin

H. J.

, & Reitzug

U. C.

(2000). Foundations of democratic education. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.

17.

Veugelers

(2000). Different ways of teaching values. Educational Review, 50(1), 37–46.

18.

Veugelers

(2001). Teachers, values, and critical thinking. In Steinberg

S. R.

, & Kincheloe

J. L.

(Eds.), Multi/interculturalism, 199–215. New York: Peter Lang.

19.

Veugelers

, & De Kat

(1998). Opvoeden in het Voortgezet Onderwijs (The pedagogical function of secondary education). Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

20.

Veugelers

, & De Kat

(1999, April). Between parents and teachers: Dividing tasks in moral education. Paper presented at the annual AERA conference in Montreal.

21.

Veugelers

, & Zijlstra

(1999, April). Restructuring secondary education in the Netherlands: Between control and autonomy. Paper presented at the annual AERA conference in Montreal.

Student Voice in School Leadership: Promoting Dialogue about Students’ Views on Teaching

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References