This article reports the results of a preliminary study of how schools involved in a national project are developing structures critical to becoming professional learning communities. The study investigates the characteristics that distinguish schools at a high level of readiness for the development of a professional learning community from those at a low level of readiness. Based on interviews of principals and teachers in 20 schools, three characteristics emerged that were evident in the high readiness level schools.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AstutoT. A., ClarkD. L., ReadA. M., McGreeK., & FernandezL. deK. P. (1993). Challenges to dominant assumptions controlling educational reform.Andover, MA: Regional Laboratory for the Educational Improvement of the Northeast and Island.
2.
CalderonM. (1998). “TLCs”—Teachers learning communities: Training manual.Baltimore: CRESPAR, Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education.New York: Macmillan Company, Collier Books in cooperation with Kappa Delta Pi.
4.
DuFourR., & EakerR. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement.Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
5.
FullanM. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform.London: Falmer Press.
6.
HordS. M. (1997a). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement.Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
7.
HordS. M. (1997b). School professional staff as learning community questionnaire.Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
8.
HordS. M., & RutherfordW. L. (1998). Creating a professional learning community: Cottonwood Creek School.Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
9.
JamesW. (1958). Talks to teachers: On psychology and to students on some of life's ideals.New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
10.
LambertL. (1998). Building leadership capacity in schools.Alexandria, VA: Association for Curriculum and Supervision Development.
11.
LevyJ., & LevyM. (1993). From chaos to community at work. In GozdzK. (Ed.), Community-building: Renewing spirit and learning (pp. 105–115). San Francisco: Newleader Press.
12.
LiebermanA. (1995). Restructuring schools: The dynamics of changing practice, structure, and culture. In LiebermanA. (Ed.), The work of restructuring schools: Building from the ground up (pp. 1–17). New York: Teachers College Press.
13.
LouisK. S., & KruseS. D. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
14.
LouisK. S., KruseS. D., & MarksJ. M. (1996). Schoolwide professional community. In NewmannF. and Associates (Eds.), Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 179–203). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
LouisK., & MilesM. B. (1990). Improving the urban high school: What works and why.New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
MitchellC., & SackneyL. (2001). Building capacity for a learning community.Downington, PA: Swets & Zeitlinger.
17.
NewmannF., & WehlageG. (1995). Successful school restructuring.Madison: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, University of Wisconsin.
18.
SengeT. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.New York: Doubleday.
19.
SergiovanniT. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
SergiovanniT. J. (1994). Building community in schools.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
SmithW. F., & AndrewsR. L. (1989). Instructional leadership: How principals make a difference.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
22.
SparksD., & HirshS. (2000). A national plan for improving professional development.Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
