This critical sociocultural view of accountability illuminates heretofore hidden, obscured, or neglected aspects of accountability—its meanings, intended and unintended consequences, and the processes by which it was institutionalized. This perspective exhumes the social and cultural processes—power, democracy, policy making, schooling, and language games—implicated in contemporary notions of accountability. Our unique positioning allows us to critically examine the “Texas model” of accountability from the inside, with implications for other regimes of accountability presently in place or being considered elsewhere.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Educational Research Association. (2001). AERA position statement concerning high-stakes testing in preK–12 education. Retrieved 2/20/01: www.aera.net/about/policy/stakes.htm
2.
BishopB. (2000, December 31). Bush's win may signal new order in politics. Austin American-Statesman, pp. A1, A10.
CallahanR. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of the public schools.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Charles A. Dana Center (1999). TEKS for leaders, phase II.Austin: Charles A. Dana Center, University of Texas.
6.
CoganJ. J., GrossmanD., & LiuM. (2000). Citizenship: The democratic imagination in a global/local context. Social Education, 64(1), 48–53.
7.
ColemanA. L. (2000). None of the above. Education Week, 19(43), 42, 45.
8.
Commission on Presidential Debates (2000). The first 2000 Gore–Bush presidential debate: October 3, 2000. Retrieved 1/24/01: www.debates.org/pages/trans2000a.html
9.
DempsterN., FreakleyM., & ParryL. (2001). The ethical climate of public schooling under new public management. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(1), 1–12.
10.
GeertzC. (2000). Available light: Anthropological reflections on philosophical topics.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
GillbornD., & YoudellD. (2000). Rationing education: Policy, practice, reform and equity.Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
12.
GoodladJ. I. (2000). Education and democracy: Advancing the agenda. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(1), 86–98.
13.
GoodsonI. (2001). Social histories of educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(1), 45–63.
14.
HaneyW. (2000, August 19). The myth of the Texas miracle in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(4). On-line http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n4/. (A printed version of this monograph is available from the Harvard Education Publishing Group.)
15.
HarmonD. (2000, December 28). Report: Net can cut costs for state. Austin American-Statesman, pp. A1, A7.
16.
HermanK. (2000, June 16). Businesses dole out high dollars for the state's GOP gathering. Austin American-Statesman, pp. B1, B5.
17.
InglehartR. (2000). Globalization and postmodern values. The Washington Quarterly, 23(1), 215–228.
18.
JohnsonJ., & DuffettA. (1999). Standards and accountability: Where the public stands.New York: Public Agenda.
19.
KleinS. P. (in press). Is there a connection between educational equity and accountability? A response to Skrla, Scheurich, Johnson, and Koschoreck. International Journal of Leadership in Education.
20.
KleinS. P., HamiltonL. S., McCaffreyD. F., & StecherB. M. (2000). What do test scores in Texas tell us? A RAND education issue paper. Retrieved 10/25/00: www.rand.org/publications/IP/IP202/
21.
KohnA. (2000). Burnt at the high stakes. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(4), 315–327.
22.
KurtzM. (2000, August 28). McCallum: Don't judge us by our label. Austin American-Statesman, pp. A1, A5.
23.
LaphamL. H. (2000, August). Notebook: School bells. Harper's, 301(1803), 7–9.
24.
McNeilL. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing.New York: Routledge.
25.
McWilliamE. (2000). The perfect corporate fit: New knowledge for new times. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3(1), 75–83.
26.
MollisonA. (2001, January 31). Business alliance unveils agenda to raise teacher quality. Austin American-Statesman, p. A12.
27.
MullerC., & SchillerK. S. (2000). Leveling the playing field?: Students’ educational attainment and states’ performance testing. Sociology of Education, 73, 196–218.
28.
MurphyJ. (2000). Governing America's schools: The shifting playing field. Teachers College Record, 102(1), 57–84.
29.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.Washington, DC: Author.
30.
RestonM. (2001, January 27). Panelists say education leaves minorities behind. Austin American-Statesman, p. B3.
31.
RestonM. (2000, August 10). Parents give Austin schools good marks. Austin American-Statesman, pp. B1, B3.
32.
RoseL. C., & GallupA. M. (2000). The 32nd annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup poll of the public's attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(1), 41–58.
33.
RyanJ. M. (2000, April). School scandals waiting to happen: Consequences of current pressures to raise test scores. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.
34.
ScheurichJ. J., SkrlaL., & JohnsonJ. F. (2000). Thinking carefully about equity and accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(4), 293–299.
60 Minutes: A Weekly News Magazine (2000, September 10). Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS).
37.
SkrlaL., ScheurichJ. J., JohnsonJ. F., & KoschoreckJ. W. (in press). Accountability for equity: Can state policy leverage social justice?International Journal of Leadership in Education.
38.
SteinbergJ. (2000, September 3). As job pressure rises, many principals fleeing. Austin American-Statesman, p. A6.
39.
Texas Business and Education Coalition (2000a). TBEC: A history of committment. Retrieved 9/15/00: www.tbec.org/history.htm
ValenzuelaA. (2000). Its own worst enemy?Texas Alcalde, September/October, 31, 44.
43.
VarenneH., & McDermottR. (1999). Successful failure: The school America builds.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
44.
VolosinovV. (1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language.New York: Seminar Press.
45.
WragaW. G. (1999). The educational and political implications of curriculum alignment and standards-based reform. Journal of Curriculum & Supervision, 15(1), 4–25.
46.
WyniaM. K., CumminsD. S., VanGeestJ. B., & WilsonI. B. (2000). Physician manipulation of the reimbursement rules for patients: Between a rock and a hard place. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(14). Retrieved 8/8/00: jama.ama-assn.org/issues/v283n14/full/joc91752.html
47.
YoungJ. (2000a, August 29). Snap out of the TAAS trap. Austin American-Statesman, p. A9.
48.
YoungJ. (2000b, October 13). What's a Texas lawmaker to do?Austin American-Statesman, p. A15.
