Trust is a significant factor in collective action. This article delineates the concept of trust in collective action in the self-managed school context. A composite case is provided to illustrate the valence of trust as a critical element in effective teamwork. A series of propositions implicit in the case is suggested in order to increase comprehension of the complex phenomenon of trust and suggest alternative directions for future inquiry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AveryD. (1981). Case studies for critical events. Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) document 234304.
2.
BachmannR. (1998). Trust: Conceptual aspects of a complex phenomenon. In LaneC., & BachmannR. (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations (pp. 289–322). New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
BaierA. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96, 231–260.
4.
BarberB. (1983). The logic and limits of trust.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
5.
BrykA., & SchneiderB. (1996). Social trust: A moral resource for school improvement. Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) document 412630.
6.
Chion-KenneyL. (1994). Site-based management and decision making.Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
7.
ConleyS., SchmidleT., & ScheddJ. (1988). Teacher participation in the management of school systems. Teachers College Record, 90, 259–280.
8.
DoneyP., & CannonJ. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61, 35–51.
9.
DonnellonA. (1996). Team talk: The power of language in team dynamics.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
10.
DrexlerA., SibbitD., & ForresterR. (1988). The team performance model. In ReddyW., & JamisonK. (Eds.), Team building: Blueprints for productivity and satisfaction (pp. 45–61). San Diego, CA: NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Science.
FrijdaN. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43, 349–358.
17.
GambettaD. (1988). Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relationships.Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
18.
HackmanJ. (1990). Groups that work and those that don't: Creating conditions for effective teamwork.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
HardinR. (1993). The street-level epistemology of trust. Politics and Society, 21, 505–529.
20.
JamesP. (1998). Chicago school reform: An inside story. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
21.
JonesG., & GeorgeJ. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23, 531–546.
22.
KeefeJ. (1992). School restructuring.Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
23.
KinlawD. (1991). Developing superior work teams.Lexington, MA: University Associates.
24.
KramerR., BrewerM., & HannaB. (1996). Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. In KramerR., & TylerT. (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 357–389). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
LarsonC., & LaFastoF. (1989). Teamwork.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
LeinL., JohnsonJ., & RaglandM. (1997). Successful Texas schoolwide programs.Austin: Dana Center, University of Texas.
27.
LewickiR., & BunkerB. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In KramerR., & TylerT. (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 114–139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
LiebermanA. (1991). Early lessons in restructuring schools.New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching, Teachers College, Columbia University.
29.
LorenzE. (1988). Neither friends nor strangers: Informal networks of subcontracting on French industry. In GambettaD. (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relationships.New York: Basil Blackwell.
30.
LumsdenG., & LumsdenD. (1993). Communicating in groups and teams: Sharing leadership.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
31.
MagjukaR., & BaldwinT. (1991). Team-based employee involvement programs: Effects of design and administration. Personnel Psychology, 44, 793–812.
32.
MayerR., DavisJ., & SchoormanF. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
33.
McAllisterD. (1995). Affect- and cognitive-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.
34.
MorganB., & BowersC. (1995). Teamwork stress: Implications for team decision making. In GuzzoR., & SalasE. (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 262–290). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
MorrisW. (1989). Mood: The frame of mind.New York: Springer.
36.
MurphyJ. (1991). Restructuring schools: Capturing and assessing the phenomena.New York: Teachers College Press.
37.
NowlisV. (1970). Mood: Behavior and experience. In ArnoldM. (Ed.), Feelings and emotions (pp. 261–277). New York: Academic Press.
38.
OlsonM. (1965). The logic of collective action.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
PascaleR. (1990). Managing on the edge.New York: Simon & Schuster.
40.
PounderD. (1998). Restructuring schools for collaboration.Albany: State University of New York Press.
SchachtA. (1989). Home-based therapy with American Indian families. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research, 3(2), 27–42.
44.
SchwartzN., & CloreG. (1988). How do I feel about it?: The informative function of affective states. In FiedlerK., & ForsasJ. (Eds.), Affective cognition and social behavior (pp. 44–62). Lewiston, NY: Hogrefe.
45.
SitkinS., & RothN. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organizational Science, 4, 367–392.
46.
SitkinS., & StickelD. (1996). The road to hell: The dynamics of distrust in an era of quality. In KramerR., & TylerT. (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 196–215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
SizerT. (1992). Horace's school: Redesigning the American high school.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
48.
SmithK., & BergD. (1987). A paradoxical conception of group dynamics. Human Relations, 40, 633–658.
49.
StakeR. (1995). The art of case study research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
SundstromE., DeMeuseK., & FutrellD. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120–133.
51.
TylerT., & DegoeyP. (1996). Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. In KramerR., & TylerT. (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 331–356). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
VarneyG. (1989). Building productive teams: An action guide and resource book.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
WeilerD., & GuertinJ. (1971). School-community relations: Some aids to analysis and planning for the school administrator. Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) document 047428.
54.
ZandD. (1997). The leadership triad: Knowledge, trust, and power.New York: Oxford University Press.
55.
Zey-FerrelM. (1979). Dimensions of organizations.Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publishing.
