This study examines school reform efforts through the lens of “reculturing” as opposed to “restructuring.” Schools must engage in reculturing processes for change to be lasting. Using this lens, an instrument was developed to measure the process of reculturing in schools engaged in national reform efforts. The use of the instrument resulted in a framework for understanding school reform as a reculturing process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoydW. (1992). The power of paradigms: Reconceptualizing policy and management. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28, 504–528.
2.
ButlerE. (1990). Learning environment assessment system: Resource manual.Memphis, TN: Memphis State University Center for Research in Educational Policy.
3.
CameronK., PetersonM., JuliaJ., WinnB., SpencerM., and PuttenJ. (1994). Assessing the culture and climate for quality improvement in the work environment. Paper presented at the Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, New Orleans, LA (May).
4.
ChenowethT. (1992). Emerging national models of schooling for at-risk students. International Journal of Educational Reform, 1(3), 255–269.
5.
CohenD. (1995). What is the system in systemic reform?Educational Researcher, 29(9), 11–17.
6.
ComerJ. (1987). New Haven's school–community connection. Educational Leadership, 44(6), 13–16.
7.
ConverseJ., and PresserS. (1986). Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
CronbachL. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
9.
CushmanK. (1991). Taking stock: How are Essential schools doing?Practitioner, 18(2), 1–10.
10.
DavidsonB., and Allen-HaynesL. (1991). Facilitation of school restructuring: Critical milestones for organization transformation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Houston, TX (January 30).
11.
DaviesD. (1989). Poor parents, teachers, and the schools: Comments about practice, policy, and research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco (March).
12.
DuFourR. (1995). Restructuring is not enough. Educational Leadership, 52(4), 33–36.
13.
DuntemanG. (1989). Principal components analysis.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
EdmondsR. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15–27.
15.
Elmore, R. and Associates. (1990). Restructuring schools: The next generation of educational reform.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
FinnanC. (1995). Making change our friend in accelerated schools. In FinnanC. (Eds.), Accelerated schools in action: Lessons from the field.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
FullanM., and StiegelbauerS. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
GibsonS., and DemboM. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569–582.
20.
GoodmanJ. (1995). Change without difference: School restructuring in historical perspective. Harvard Educational Review, 65(1), 1–28.
21.
HallingerP., MurphyJ., and HausmanC. (1992). Restructuring schools: Principals’ perceptions of fundamental educational reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(3), 330–349.
22.
HalpinA., and CroftD. (1963). The organizational climate of schools.Chicago: Midwest Administration Center of the University of Chicago.
23.
HargreavesA. (1991). Contrived collegiality: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. In BlaseJ. (Ed.), The politics of life in schools.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
HargreavesA. (1995). Renewal in the age of paradox. Educational Leadership, 52(4), 14–19.
25.
HargreavesA., EarlL., and RyanJ. (1996). Schooling for change: Educating young adolescents for tomorrow's world.Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
26.
HaynesN., and ComerJ. P. (1993). The Yale School Development Program: Processes, outcomes, and policy implications. Urban Education, 28(2), 166–199.
27.
HopfenbergW., LevinH., ChaseC., ChristensenS., MooreM., SolerP., BrunerL., KellerB., and RodriguezG. (1993). The Accelerated schools resource guide.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
HoyW. (1990). Organizational climate and culture: A conceptual analysis of the school workplace. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1(2), 149–168.
29.
HoyW., and FeldmanJ. (1987). Organizational health: The concept and its measure. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20, 30–38.
30.
JohnsonW., SnyderK., AndersonR., and JohnsonA. (1993). School work culture profile: A statistical analysis and strategy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, TX (January).
31.
JoyceB., and CalhounE. (1995). School renewal: An inquiry, not a formula. Educational Leadership, 52(4), 51–55.
32.
KimJ., and MuellerC. (1978). Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to do it.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
KirbyP., and MartinC. (1995). Out of national reform efforts: Weighing the evidence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco (April).
34.
LeibermanA. (1995). Restructuring schools: The dynamics of changing practice, structure, and culture. In LeibermanA. (Ed.), The work of restructuring schools: Building from the ground up.New York: Teachers College Press.
35.
LevinH., and HopfenbergW. (1991). Don't remediate: Accelerate!Principal, 70(3), 11–13.
36.
LevineD., and LezotteL. (1990). Unusually effective schools: A review and analysis of research and practice.Madison, WI: National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
37.
LezotteL., and BancroftA. (1985). School improvement based on effective schools research: A promising approach for economically disadvantaged and minority students. Journal of Negro Education, 54(3), 301–312.
38.
MurphyJ. (1991). Restructuring schools: Capturing and assessing the phenomena.New York: Teachers College Press.
39.
MurphyJ., and HallingerP. (1993). Restructuring schooling: Learning from ongoing efforts.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
40.
O'NeillJ. (1995). On schools as learning organizations: A conversation with Peter Senge. Educational Leadership, 52(4), 20–23.
41.
PopkewitzT. (1984). The ideas and ideology of progress in social and educational thought. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA (April).
42.
PrestineN. (1993). Feeling the ripples, riding the waves: Making an essential school. In MurphyJ., and HallingerP. (Eds.), Restructuring schooling: Learning from ongoing efforts (pp. 32–61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
43.
PrestineN., and BowenC. (1993). Benchmarks of change: Assessing essential school restructuring efforts. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(3), 298–319.
44.
PrestineN., and McGrealT. (1997). Fragile changes, sturdy lives: Implementing authentic assessment in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(3), 371–400.
45.
RossS., SandersW., and StringfieldS. (1998). The Memphis Restructuring Initiative: Achievement results for years 1 and 2 on the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS). A Special Report prepared for Memphis City Schools (June).
46.
RossmanG., CorbettH., and FirestoneW. (1988). Change and effectiveness in schools: A cultural perspective.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
47.
SarasonS. (1996). Revisiting ‘The culture of the school and the problem of change’.New York: Teachers College Press.
48.
SarasonS. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it's too late?San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
49.
SarasonS. (1971). The culture of the school and the problem of change.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
50.
SashkinM., and SashkinM. G. (1990). Leadership and culture building in schools: Quantitative and qualitative understandings. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston (April).
51.
SashkinM., and SashkinM. G. (1993). Principals and their school cultures: Understandings from quantitative and qualitative research. In SaskinM., and WalbergH. J. (Eds.), Educational leadership and school culture.Berkeley: McCutchan.
52.
ScheinE. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
SchumanH., and PresserS. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context.New York: Academic Press.
54.
SizerT. (1989). Diverse practice, shared ideas: The Essential school. In WalbergH. J., and LaneJ. J. (Eds.), Organizing for learning: Toward the 21st century.Reston, VA: NASSP.
55.
SlavinR., MaddenN., DolanJ., WasikB., RossS., and SmithL. (1994). “Whenever and wherever we choose…” The replication of Success for All. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 639–647.
56.
JohnE. St., MezaJ., Allen-HaynesL., and DavidsonB. (1995). Building communities of inquiry: Linking teacher research and school restructuring. In FinnanC. (Eds.), Accelerated schools in action: Lessons from the field.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
57.
StrikeK. (1993). Professionalism, democracy, and discursive communities: Normative reflections on restructuring. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 255–273.
58.
StringfieldS., and HermanB. (1994). Observations of partial implementations of the Coalition of Essential Schools: The need for higher reliability organizational methods. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA (April).
59.
SullivanJ., and FeldmanS. (1979). Multiple indicators: An introduction.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60.
Wonycott-KytleA., and BogotchI. (1997). Reculturing: Assumptions, beliefs, and values underlying the process of restructuring. Journal of School Leadership.7(1), 27–49.
