This article reports the two-year tenure of a woman superintendent in a small southern city. Placed against the background of local community politics and school district politics it shows that women in the superintendency still face issues of gender stereotyping that influence the way they are perceived as leaders of school systems. A feminist poststructuralist framework is used to understand how the various subject positions available to women collide with the discourse of the superintendency. It is recommended that women leaders resist the images that have been traditionally reserved for them and begin to reinvent the superintendency on their own terms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlstonJ. (1999). Climbing hills and mountains: Black females making it to the superintendency. In BrunnerC. (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 79–90). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
2.
AtwoodM. (1996). Alias grace.New York: Nan A. Talese.
3.
American Association of School Administrators (1993). Professional standards for the superintendency.Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
4.
BeekleyC. (1999). Dancing in red shoes: Why women leave the superintendency. In BrunnerC. (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 161–175). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
5.
BeniV., CooperB., and MuthR. (1988). Schooling loses when either the board or the superintendent always win. The American School Board Journal, 175(8), 24–25.
6.
BiklenS., and ShakeshaftC. (1985). The new scholarship on women. In KleinS. (Eds.), Handbook for achieving sex equity through education (pp. 44–52). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
BjorkL. (1993). Effective schools–effective superintendents: The emerging instructional leadership role. Journal of School Leadership, 3(3), 246–259.
8.
BlountJ. (1998). Destined to rule the schools.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
9.
BlountJ. (1999). “Turning out the ladies”: Elected women superintendents and the push for the appointive system, 1900–1935. In BrunnerC. (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 9–28). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
10.
BogdanR., and BiklenS. (1992). Qualitative research for education (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
11.
BrunnerC. C. (1997a). Working through the “riddle of the heart”: Perspectives of women superintendents. Journal of School Leadership, 7(2), 138–163.
12.
BrunnerC. C. (1997b). Exercising power. The School Administrator, 6(54), 6–10.
13.
BrunnerC. C. (1998). Can power support an “ethic of care?” An examination of the professional practices of women superintendents. Journal for a Just and Caring Education, 4(2), 142–175.
14.
BrunnerC. C. (1999). Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
15.
BrunnerC. C. (1995). By power defined: Women in the superintendency. Educational Considerations, 22(20), 21–26.
16.
CapperC. (1998). Critically oriented and postmodern perspectives: Sorting out the differences and the applications for practice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 354–379.
17.
CarterG., and CunninghamW. (1997). The American school superintendent: Leading in an age of pressure.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
ChaseS. (1995). Ambiguous empowerment. The work narratives of women school superintendents.Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
19.
CubanL. (1985). Conflict and leadership in the superintendency. Phi Delta Kappan, 6(1), 28–30.
20.
CubanL. (1988). Superintending: Images and roles. InThe managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools (pp. 111–147). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
21.
DaviesB. (1993). Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities.Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
22.
GilliganC. (1993). In a different voice (new ed.) Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
23.
GlaserB., and StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.New York: Aldine.
24.
GlassT. (1992). The 1992 study of the American school superintendency.Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
25.
GlassT. (1993a). Through the looking glass. In CarterD., GlassT., and HordS. (Eds.), Selecting, preparing and developing the school district superintendent (pp. 20–36). Washington DC: Falmer Press.
26.
GlassT. (1993b). Point and counterpoint: What is in the context of what might be? In CarterD., GlassT., and HordS. (Eds.), Selecting, preparing and developing the school district superintendent (pp. 37–56). Washington DC: Falmer Press.
27.
GlassT. (1993c). Exemplary superintendents: Do they fit the model? In CarterD., GlassT., and HordS. (Eds.), Selecting, preparing and developing the school district superintendent (pp. 57–70). Washington DC: Falmer Press.
28.
GroganM., and HenryM. (1995). Women candidates for the superintendency: Board perspectives. In IrbyB., and BrownG. (Eds.), Women as school executives: Voices and visions.Huntsville: Texas Council of Women School Executives.
29.
GroganM., and SmithF. (1998). A feminist perspective of women superintendents’ approaches to moral dilemmas. Just and Caring Education, 4(2), 176–192.
30.
GroganM. (1996). Voices of women aspiring to the superintendency.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
31.
GroganM. (1998). Feminist approaches to educational leadership: Relationships based on care. In IrbyB., and BrownG. (Eds.), Women leaders: Structuring success (pp. 164–173). Houston, TX: Kendall/Hunt.
32.
GroganM. (1999). A feminist poststructuralist account of collaboration: A model for the superintendency. In BrunnerC. (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 199–216). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
33.
HodgkinsonH., and MontenegroX. (1999). The U.S. school superintendent: The invisible CEO.Washington DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
34.
HordS. (1993). Smoke, mirrors or reality: Another instructional leader. In CarterD., GlassT., and HordS. (Eds.), Selecting, preparing and developing the school district superintendent (pp. 1–19). Washington DC: Falmer Press.
35.
HoyleJ., and OatesA. (1994). New professional standards for the superintendency: Will they close the governance gap? In BurdinJ., and HoyleJ. (Eds.), Leadership and diversity in education: The second yearbook of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (pp. 213–222). Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
36.
JacksonB. (1996). The voices of African American women public school superintendents: A preliminary report. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Researchers Association, New York (April).
37.
JacksonB. (1999). Getting inside history—against all odds: African American women school superintendents. In BrunnerC. (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 141–160). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
38.
JacksonD. (1999). Thoughtful practice: Responding with questions from the superintendency. In BrunnerC. (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 217–220). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
39.
JohnsonS. M. (1996). Leading to change: The challenge of the new superintendency.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40.
KamlerE., and ShakeshaftC. (1999). The role of search consultants in the career paths of women superintendents. In BrunnerC. (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 51–62). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
41.
KennedyJ. (1984). When collective bargaining first came to education: A superintendent's viewpoint. Government Union Review, 5(1), 14–26.
42.
LatherP. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern.New York: Routledge.
43.
LincolnY., and GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage.
44.
LindleJ., MillerL., and LaganaJ. (1992). Coping in the superintendency: Gender-related perspectives. In WendelF. (Ed.), Issues of professional preparation and practice (pp. 33–53). University Park, PA: University Council for Educational Administration.
45.
MaienzaJ. (1986). The superintendency: Characteristics of access for men and women. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(4), 59–79.
46.
McAdamsR., and CressmanB. (1997). The roles of Pennsylvania superintendents and school boards as perceived by superintendents and school board members. Educational Research Quarterly, 21(1), 44–57.
47.
McCloudB., and McKenzieF. (1994). School boards and superintendents in urban districts. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(5), 384–385.
48.
Mendez-MorseS. (1999). Redefinition of self: Mexican-American women becoming superintendents. In BrunnerC. (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 125–140). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
49.
MilesM., and HubermanA. (1984). Qualitative data analysis.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
50.
MurphyJ., and HallingerP. (1986). The superintendent as instructional leader: Findings from effective school districts. The Journal of Educational Administration, 24(2), 213–236.
51.
MyersM. (1992). Effective schools and the superintendency: Perception and practice. Contemporary Education, 63(2), 96–101.
52.
NoddingsN. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education.Berkeley: University of California Press.
53.
NoddingsN. (1992). The challenge to care in schools.New York: Teachers College Press.
54.
OrtizF. I., and OrtizD. J. (1993). Politicizing executive action: The case of Hispanic female superintendents. In MarshallC. (Ed.), The new politics of race and gender. The 1992 Yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (pp. 155–167). Washington DC: Falmer Press.
55.
OrtizF. I. (1991). A Hispanic female superintendent's leadership and school district culture. In WynerN. (Ed.), Current perspectives on the culture of school.Cambridge: Brookline Books.
56.
OrtizF. I. (1999). Seeking and selecting Hispanic female superintendents. In BrunnerC. (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 91–101). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
57.
PauluN. (1989). Key player in school reform: The superintendent. The School Administrator, 46(3), 8–12.
58.
PavanB. N. (1999). The first years: What should a female superintendent know beforehand? In BrunnerC. (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 105–124). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
59.
PluckerO., and KruegerJ. (1987). Heed these common sense tips and get along with your board. The Executive Educator, 9(6), 26–29.
60.
ScherrM. (1995). The glass ceiling reconsidered: Views from below. In DunlapP., and SchmuckP. (Eds.), Women leading in education. Women leading in education (pp. 199–224). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
61.
ScottJ. (1988). Gender and the politics of history.New York: Columbia University Press.
62.
StraussA. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
TallericoM., and BurstynJ. (1996). Retaining women in the superintendency: The location matters. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 642–664.
64.
TallericoM. (1994). Exits from urban superintendencies: The intersection of politics, race and gender. Urban Education, 28, 439–454.
65.
TallericoM. (1999). Women and the superintendency: What do we really know? In BrunnerC. (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 29–48). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
66.
TallericoM., BurstynJ., and PooleW. (1993). Gender and politics at work: Why women exit the superintendency.Fairfax, VA: National Policy Board for Educational Administration.
67.
WeedonC. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). New York: Basil Blackwell.
68.
WessonL., and GradyM. (1994). An analysis of women urban superintendents: A national study. Urban Education, 8(4), 412–424.
69.
WessonL., and GradyM. (1995). A leadership perspective from women superintendents. In IrbyB., and BrownG. (Eds.), Women as school executives: Voices and visions. (pp. 35–41). Huntsville: Texas Council of Women School Executives.
70.
WheatleyM. J. (1992). Leadership and the new science: Learning about organization from an orderly universe.San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
71.
WilsonR. (1980). The anatomy of success in the superintendency. Phi Delta Kappan, 62(1), 20–21.
