Organizations as learning institutions are dependent on the degree to which they are able to encourage collective thinking. Although collaboration, for the most part, is seen as the vehicle to accomplish this goal, roadblocks can hinder the process. This exercise places students in both competitive and collaborative situations, creates constraints to collective thinking, and asks them to develop negotiation and conflict handling strategies to overcome these hurdles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Argyris, C.
(1990, May-June). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review, 99-109.
2.
Cosier, R.
,& Schwenk, C. (1990). Agreement and thinking alike: Ingredients for poor decisions. Academy of Management Executive, 4(1), 69-74.
3.
Fisher, R.
, & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
4.
Hall, D.
, Bowen, D., Lewicki, R., & Hall, F. (1982). Experiences in management and organizational behavior (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
5.
Hofstede, G.
(1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Isaacs, W.
(1993, Fall). Dialogue, collective thinking, and organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics.
7.
Senge, P.
(1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
