This study empirically identifies which teacher-controlled (contextual) variables have the greatest impact on whether the student will have a great team experience or a miserable one. The results indicate that the clarity of instructions to the team, the longevity of the team experience, and self-selection of teammates all positively affect team experiences. The level of management education, the team size, and the percentage of the course grade associated with team performance did not differ across best and worst team experiences. Contrary to previous empirical findings and conventional wisdom, the use of peer evaluations was negatively associated with good team experiences. Further insights from the data and implications for the use of student teams are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albanese, R.
,& Van Fleet, D. D. (1985). Rational behavior in groups: The free-riding tendency. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 244-255.
2.
Bacon, D. R.
, Stewart, K. A., & Stewart-Belle, S. (1998). Exploring predictors of student team project performance. Journal of Marketing Education, 20(1), 63-71.
3.
Baldwin, T. T.
, Bedell, M. D.,& Johnson, J. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1369-1397.
4.
Bettenhausen, K. L.
(1991, June). Five years of group research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 345-381.
5.
Burningham, C.
, & West, M. A. (1995). Individual, climate, and group interaction processes as predictors of work team innovation. Small Group Research, 26(1), 106-117.
6.
Clark, G. L.
(1989, Fall). Peer evaluations: An empirical test of their validity and reliability. Journal of Marketing Education, 11, 41-58.
7.
Cohen, A. R.
(1993). The portable MBA in management. New York: Wiley.
8.
Cohen, J.
(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
9.
Comer, D. R.
(1995). A model of social loafing in real work groups. Human Relations, 48(6), 647-667.
10.
Cook, R. W.
(1981). An investigation of student peer evaluation on group project performance. Journal of Marketing Education, 3(1), 50-52.
11.
Decker, R.
(1995). Management team formation for large scale simulations. In J. D. Overby& A. L. Patz (Eds.), Developments in business simulation& experiential exercises (22)(pp. 128-129). Statesboro, GA: Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning.
12.
Eden, D.
(1985). Team development: A true field experiment at three levels of rigor. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(1), 94-100.
13.
Fisher, C. D.
, Shaw, J. B., & Ryder, P. (1994). Problems in project groups: An anticipatory case study. Journal of Management Education, 18(3), 351-355.
14.
Fowler, A.
(1995). How to build effective teams. People Management, 1(4), 40-41.
15.
French, W. L.
,& Bell, C. H. (1994). Organizational development: Behavioral science interventions for organizational improvement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
Gentry, J. W.
(1980). Group size and attitudes toward the simulation experience. Simulation & Games, 11(4), 451-459.
17.
Gersick, C.J.G.
(1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 274-309.
18.
Gosenpud, J. J.
, & Washbush, J. B. (1991). Predicting simulation performance: Differences between individuals and groups. In W. J. Wheatley & J. Gosenpud (Eds.), Developments in business simulation & experiential exercises (18)(pp. 44-48). Stillwater, OK: Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning.
19.
Hackman, J. R.
(Ed.) (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
Harkins, S. G.
,& Jackson, J. M. (1985). The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(4), 457-465.
21.
Harrison, K.
, & Cooper, C. L. (1976). The use of groups in education. Small Group Behavior, 7(3), 259-270.
22.
Ingham, A. G.
, Levinger, G., Graves, J.,& Peckham, V. (1974). The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 371-384.
23.
Jaffe, E. D.
, & Nebenzahl, I. D. (1990). Group interaction and business game performance. Simulation & Gaming, 21(2), 133-146.
24.
Jalajas, D. S.
, & Sutton, R. I. (1984-1985). Feuds in student groups, coping with whiners, martyrs, saboteurs, bullies, and deadbeats. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 9(4), 217-227.
25.
Janus, I. L.
(1982). Groupthink(2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
26.
Jones, D. W.
(1996). Empowered teams in the classroom canwork. Journal for Quality and Participation, 19, 80-87.
27.
Katz, R.
(1982). The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(1), 81-104.
28.
Katzenbach, J. R.
, & Smith, D. K. (1993). The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 111-120.
29.
Kerr, N. L.
(1983). Motivation losses in small groups: Asocial dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 819-828.
30.
Kerr, N. L.
,& Bruun, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 78-94.
31.
Kirk, R. E.
(1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences(2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
32.
Krayer, K. J.
(1988). Exploring group maturity in the classroom. Small Group Behavior, 19(2), 259-272.
33.
Latané, B.
, Williams, K.,& Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light thework: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822-832.
34.
Lerner, L. D.
(1995). Making student groups work. Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 123-125.
35.
LeRosen, R. G.
(1976, April). Group projects, peer rating scales: Management education tools. Journal of Business Education, 317-318.
36.
Mello, J. A.
(1993). Improving individual member accountability in small work group settings. Journal of Management Education, 17(2), 253-259.
37.
Mesch, D. J.
(1991). The jigsawtechnique: Away to establish individual accountability in group work. Journal of Management Education, 15(3), 355-358.
38.
Michaelsen, L. K.
(1991). From the editor. Journal of Management Education, 15(3), 275-275.
39.
Quirk, T.
(1989, Spring). A procedure designed to assist students to improve their presentation skills as part of a marketing planning team. Journal of Marketing Education, 11, 40-44.
40.
Rentsch, J. R.
, Heffner, T. S.,& Duffy, L. T. (1994). What you knowis what you get from experience: Team experience related to teamwork schemas. Group & Organization Management, 19, 450-475.
41.
Rollier, B.
(1992). Observations of a corporate facilitator. Simulation & Gaming, 23(4), 442-456.
42.
Rosenbaum, M. E.
, Moore, D. I., Cotton, J. L., Cook, M. S., Hieser, R. A., Shovar, M. N.,& Gray, M. J. (1980). Group productivity and process: Pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 626-642.
43.
Schultz, B.
,& Anderson, J. (1984). Training in the management of conflict. Small Group Behavior, 15(3), 333-348.
44.
Steers, R. M.
, & Porter, L. W. (1991). Motivation and work behavior(5th ed.). New York:McGraw-Hill.
45.
Strong, J. T.
,& Anderson, R. E. (1990, Summer). Free-riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and preliminary data. Journal of Marketing Education, 12, 61-67.
46.
Tuckman, B. W.
(1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63,384-389.
47.
Vora, J. A.
, & Akula, W. G. (1978). Peer and self assessments in small groups. Small Group Behavior, 9(3), 427-434.
48.
Wageman, R.
(1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 145-180.
49.
Williams, D. L.
, Beard, J. D., & Rymer, J. (1991, Summer). Team projects: Achieving their full potential. Journal of Marketing Education, 13, 45-53.
50.
Witteman, H.
(1991). Group member satisfaction. Small Group Research, 22(1), 24-58.
51.
Wolfe, J.
, & Box, T. M. (1988). Team cohesion effects on business game performance. Simulation & Games, 19(1), 82-98.
52.
Wolfe, J.
, & Chacko, T. I. (1983). Team-size effects on business game performance and decision-making behaviors. Decision Sciences, 14, 121-133.
53.
Zemke, R.
(1993). Rethinking the rush to team up. Training, 30(11), 55-61.
