The large introductory class presents unique problems in the division and integration of classroom activities. These problems can be resolved in a number of ways. The authors develop a taxonomy of four such resolutions that differ from one another in terms of centralization of control and standardization of coordination. The authors also describe contingency factors (class size as well as the interests and demands of instructor, student, and institutional constituents) that influence the effectiveness of each alternative.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldrich, H. E.
(1975). Reaction to Donaldson’s note. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 457-459.
2.
Blau, P. M.
(1970). Decentralization in bureaucracies. In M. N. Zald (Ed.), Power in organizations. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
3.
Brittain, J.
, & Wholley, D. R. (1990). Assessing organizational ecology as social theory: Comment on Young. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 439-444.
4.
Burns, T.
, & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
5.
Child, J.
(1972). Organizational structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6, 1-22.
6.
Donaldson, L.
(1975). Organizational status and the measurement of centralization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 453-456.
7.
Donaldson, L.
(1985). In defence of organization theory: A reply to the critics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Freeman, R. E.
(1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
9.
Galbraith, J. R.
(1977). Organization design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10.
Lawrence, P. R.
, & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
March, J. G.
, & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
12.
Mintzberg, H.
(1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
Mitroff, I. A.
(1983). Stakeholders of the organizational mind. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Pennings, J. M.
(1975). The relevance of the structural-contingency model for organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 393-410.
15.
Pennings, J. M.
(1992). Structural contingency theory: A reappraisal. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior(Vol. 14, pp. 267-309). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
16.
Pennings, J. M.
,& Goodman, P. S. (1977). Toward aworkable framework. In P. S. Goodman& J. M. Pennings (Eds.), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness(pp. 146-184). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Pfeffer, J.
(1982). Organizations and organizational theory. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
18.
Pfeffer, J.
,& Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper& Row.
19.
Price, J. L.
, & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
20.
Schoonhoven, C. B.
(1981). Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 349-377.
21.
Thompson, J. D.
(1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
Thorngate, W.
(1976). “In general” vs. “it depends”: Some comments of the Gergen-Schlenker debate. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 404-410.
23.
Tsui, A. S.
(1990). Amultiple-constituency model of effectiveness: An empirical examination at the human resource subunit level. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 458-483.
24.
Van de Ven, A. H.
, & Ferry, D. L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: John Wiley.
25.
Wagner, J. A. III
(1995). Coursepack for Management 100(3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster.
26.
Wagner, J. A. III, Buchko, A.,& Gooding, R. Z. (1988). Aston research on organizational structure: A meta-analytic examination of generalizability. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
27.
Wagner, J. A. III
,& Hollenbeck, J. R. (1998a). Exercises and cases for management and organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
Wagner, J. A. III
, & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1998b). Organizational behavior: Securing competitive advantage(3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29.
Wagner, J. A. III
,& Schneider, B. (1987). Legal regulation and the constraint of constituent satisfaction. Journal of Management Studies, 24, 189-200.
30.
Weber, M.
(1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press.
31.
Weick, K. E.
(1979). The social psychology of organizing(2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison Wesky
