This article's intent is to refocus the way in which we as educators think about and structure written assignments in our courses. Specifically, the authors argue for a shift in priorities: away from general skills such as the mechanics of writing or general analytic capability and toward a more particular focus on the specific ideas of unique individuals. They argue that by so doing, students are more likely to improve both their analytical and written skills. The authors illustrate this approach by describing the way in which they structure assignments, provide feedback, and create a climate for writing in organization behavior and accounting theory courses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, B.
, & Enz, C. (1987). Journal writing: Exercises in creative thought. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 11(4), 1-14.
2.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
. (1988). Education requirements for entry into the accounting profession. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. New York: Author.
3.
Andrews, J. D.
, & Sigband, N. B. (1984). How effectively does the "new accountant" communicate? Perceptions by practitioners and academics. The Journal of Business Communication, 21(2), 15-24.
4.
Arthur Anderson & Co.
, Arthur Young, Coopers & Lybrand, Deloitte Haskins & Sells, Ernst & Whinney, Peat Marwick Main & Co., Price Waterhouse, and Touch Ross. Perspectives on education: Capabilities for success in the accounting profession. (1989). New York: Author.
5.
Axley, S.
(1990). Improving written and oral communication skills through reaction papers. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 14(2), 124-128.
6.
Baker, S.
(1983). Writing as learning. In P. L. Stock (Ed.), Forum: Essays on theory and practice in the teaching of writing (pp. 224-226). Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
7.
Bartholomae, D.
(1987). Writing on the margins: The concept of literacy in higher education. In T. Enos (Ed.), A source book for basic writing teachers. New York: Random House.
8.
Bernhardt, S.
(1983). Contexts in which students make meanings. In P. L. Stock (Ed.), Forum: Essays on theory and practice in the teaching of writing (pp. 324-331). Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
9.
Clinebell, S.
(1992). Using managerial implication papers in a principles of management class. Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 116-118.
10.
Corman, E. J.
(1986). A writing program for accounting courses. Journal of Accounting Education, 4(2), 85-95.
11.
Emig, J.
(1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 25, 122-128.
12.
Freisinger, R.
(1982). Cross-disciplinary writing programs: Beginnings. In T. Fulweiler & A. Young (Eds.), Language connections: Writing and reading across the curriculum (pp. 3-13). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
13.
Fulweiler, T.
(1987). Teaching with writing. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
14.
Henry, L. G.
, & Razzouck, N. Y. (1988). The CPA's perception of accounting education: Implications for curriculum development. The Accounting Educators' Journal, Spring, 105-117.3
15.
Hairstone, M.
(1986). On not being a composition slave. In C. W. Bridge (Ed.), Teaching the new teacher of college composition. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
16.
Knoblauch, C. H.
, & Brannon, L. (1981). Teacher commentary on student writing: The state of the art. Freshman English News, 10(2), 1-3.
17.
Levan, S.
(1987). A community of writers: Collaborative writing for the organization. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 11(3), 127-130.
18.
McCrimmon, J.
(1976). Writing as a way of knowing. In R. Graves (Ed.), Rhetoric and composition: A sourcebook for teachers and writers (pp. 3-12). Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
19.
Porter, L.
, & McKibbin, L. (1988). Management education and development: Drift orthrust into the 21st century. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
Rappaport, A.
, & Cawelti, G. S. (1993). Using peer review to improve the writing of case analyses: Requirements and experience. Journal of Management Education, 17(4), 485-497.
21.
Schiff, P.
(1982). Responding to writing: Peer critiques, teacher-student conferences, and essay evaluation. In T. Fulweiler & A. Young (Eds.), Language connections: Writing and reading across the curriculum (pp. 153-165). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
22.
Scofield, B. W.
, & Combes, L. (1993). Designing and managing meaningful writing assignments. Issues in Accounting Education, 8(1), 71-85.
23.
Sommers, D.
(1991). The choice of leader to write about is not a random event. Journal of Management Education, 15(3), 359-361.
24.
Sommers, N.
(1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31, 378-388.
25.
Sommers, N.
(1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 31(3), 378-388.
26.
Stanford, G.
, & The Committee on Classroom Practices (Eds.). (1979). How to handle the paper load. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
27.
Stocks, K. D.
, Stoddard, T. D., & Waters, M. L. (1992). Writing in the accounting curriculum: Guidelines for professors. Issues in Accounting Education, 7(2), 193-204.
28.
Walvoord, B.E.F.
(1986). Helping students write well: A guide for teachers in all disciplines (2nd ed). New York: Modern Language Association of America.
