Although the norm of formal, impersonal leader-subordinate relationships often prevails in contemporary organizations, it is proposed that the leadership role may be enhanced by the development of closer, less formal relationships. Using the Leader-Subordinate Friendship Questionnaire (LSFQ), the managerial dilemma of balancing such relationships is addressed. The questionnaire provides a tool for integrating the concept of leader-subordinate friendship into organizational behavior theory and practice by developing a forum for classroom discussion that can be applied to all levels of instruction, including both academic and consulting environments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Byham, W. B.
(1988). Zapp! The lightning of empowerment. Pittsburgh, PA: Development Dimensions International Press.
2.
Byrne, D.
(1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
3.
Byrne, D.
, & Clore, G. L. (1970). A reinforcement model of evaluative responses. Personality: An International Journal, 1, 103-128.
4.
Clark, M. S.
, & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
5.
Conger, J. A.
(1989). Leadership: The art of empowering others. Academy of Management Executive, 3, 17-24.
6.
Crouch, A.
, & Yetton, P. (1988). Manager-subordinate dyads: Relationships among task and social contact, manager friendliness and subordinate performance in management groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 65-82.
7.
Dobbins, G. H.
, & Russell, J. M. (1986). The biasing effects of subordinate likableness on leaders' responses to poor performers: A laboratory and a field study. Personnel Psychology, 39, 759-775.
8.
Dugan, K. W.
(1989). Ability and effort attributions: Do they affect how managers communicate performance feedback information. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 87-114.
9.
Fine, G. A.
(1986). Friendships in the work place. In V. J. Derlega & B. A. Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction (pp. 185-206). New York: Springer-Verlag.
10.
Fombrun, C. J.
(1982). Strategies for network research. Academy of Management Review, 7, 280-291.
11.
Graen, G. B.
, Liden, R. C., & Hoel, W. (1982). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 868-872.
12.
Harvey, J. B.
(1974). The Abilene paradox: The management of agreement. Organizational Dynamics, 3, 63-80.
13.
Hays, R. B.
(1984). The development and maintenance of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 75-98.
14.
Hays, R. B.
(1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 909-924.
15.
Henneman, D. B.
, Greenberger, D. B., & Anonyuo, C. (1989). Attributions and exchanges: The effects of interpersonal factors on the diagnosis of employee performance. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 466-476.
16.
Hummel, R. P.
(1982). The bureaucratic experience (2nd ed.). New York: St. Martin's.
17.
Hunt, D. M.
, & Michael, C. (1983). Mentorship: A career training and development tool. Academy of Management Review, 8, 475-485.
18.
Janis, I. L.
(1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
19.
Kanter, R. M.
(1983). The change masters. New York: Simon & Schuster.
20.
Kerr, S.
, & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375-403.
21.
Kiechel, W. III
. (1986, April 10). The workaholic generation. Fortune, pp. 50-62.
22.
Kouzes, J. M.
, & Posner, B. Z. (1987). The leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Kram, K. E.
(1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 608-625.
24.
Lawler, E. E. III
(1986). High involvement management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Livingston, J. S.
(1969). Pygmalion in management. Harvard Business Review, 47(4), 81-89.
26.
Lott, A. J.
, & Lott, B. E. (1960). The formation of positive attitudes toward group members. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 408-412.
27.
Luft, J.
(1984). Group processes: An introduction to group dynamics (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
28.
Nelson, R. E.
(1989). The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 377-401.
29.
Noe, R. A.
(1988a). Women and mentoring: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 13, 65-78.
30.
Noe, R. A.
(1988b). An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Personnel Psychology, 41, 457-479.
31.
Pearce, J. A.
, & David, F. R. (1983). A social network approach to organizational design-performance. Academy of Management Review, 8, 436-444.
32.
Peters, T. J.
, & Waterman, R. H., Jr. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best run companies. New York: Harper & Row.
33.
Porter, L. W.
, & Lawler, E. E. III. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
34.
Rogers, C. R.
, & Roethlisberger, F. J. (1952). Barriers and gateways to communication. Harvard Business Review, 30(4), 46-52.
35.
Schutte, J. G.
, & Light, J. M. (1978). The relative importance of proximity and status for friendship choices in social hierarchies. Social Psychology, 41, 260-264.
36.
Stewart, T. A.
(1989, November 6). New ways to exercise power. Fortune, pp. 52-64.
37.
Tichy, N. M.
, & Devanna, M. A. (1986). The transformational leader. New York: Wiley.
38.
Vecchio, R. P.
, & Gobdel, B. C. (1984). The vertical dyad linkage model of leadership: Problems and prospects. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 5-20.
39.
Verbrugge, L. M.
(1977). The structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces, 56, 576-597.
40.
Zaleznik, A.
(1977). Managers and leaders: Are they different?Harvard Business Review, 55(3), 67-78.
