Importance ratings of student characteristics by employers are derived through the
use of conjoint analysis. The relative benefits of conjoint analysis as compared to more
typical methods of deriving importance characteristics are discussed. Implications for
marketing education and the marketing curriculum are also presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benson, George
and
Joseph Chasin
(1976),
"Entry-level Positions : Do Business Schools Really Give an Advantage?"Journal of College Placement , 37 (Fall),
73-77
.
2.
Gaedeke, Ralph M.
,
Dennis H. Toolelian
, and
Burton F. Schaffer
(1983),
"Employers Want Motivated Communicators for Entry-level Marketing Positions,"Marketing News (August 5),
1
.
3.
Gentry, James W.
and
Alvin C. Burns
(1977-78),
"How Important Are Evaluation Criteria in Shopping Center Patronage?"Journal of Retailing , 53 (Winter),
73-86
.
4.
Green, Paul E.
and
Yoram Wind
(1975),
"New Way to Measure Consumers' Judgments,"Harvard Business Review, 53 (July-August),
107-117
.
5.
Hafer, J.C.
and
C.C. Hoth
(1981),
"Job Selection Attributes: Employer Preferences vs. Student Perceptions,"Journal of College Placement , 41 (Winter),
55-57
.
6.
Stamps, Miriam B.
and
E.W. Boatwright
(1986),
"Student and Employer Ratings of Attribute Importance: Implications for Marketing Education,"Proceedings, American Marketing Association Winter Educators' Conference (February).
7.
Uehling, Barbara S.
(1979),
"Education for Work,"Journal of College Placement, 39 (Summer),
24-27
.
