Bane, C.L.The Lecture versus the Class Discussion Method of College Teaching , School and Society, 21, 1925, pp. 300-301.
2.
Birney, R., and McKeachie, W.J.The Teaching of Psychology: A Survey of Research since 1942, Psychological Bulletin, 52, 1955 , pp. 58-66.
3.
Elfner, Eliot S.Lecture Versus Discussion Formats in Teaching a Basic Management Course , Academy of Management Proceedings80, August 1980, pp. 104-107.
4.
Fritzsche, David J.The Lecture vs. the Game, Simulation Games and Experiential Learning Techniques: On the Road to a New Frontier; Proceedings of a National Conference on Business Gaming and Experiential Learning ( Norman, OK: Center for Economic and Business Research, University of Oklahoma, 1974, pp. 41-46.
5.
Hayes, W.L., Statistics for the Social Sciences. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973, pp. 3360-67.
6.
Kolb, David, Experiential Learning Theory and the LearningStyle Inventory: A Reply to Freedman and Stumpf, Academy of Management Review , 6, 2, 1981, pp. 289-96.
7.
Moore. LarryF. Business Games vs.Cases as Tools of Learning, Training and Development Journal, 21, 101967, pp. 12-13.
8.
Sanford, F., Lindzey, G., Holmreich, R., and Parker, G.Systematic Comparative Study of Methods for Meeting the Needs of Large Scale Undergraduate Teaching. Austin, Texas: University of Texas, 1969.
9.
Stumpf, Stephen A., and Freedman, Richard D., The Learning Style Inventory: Still Less than Meets the Eye, Academy of Management Review, 6, 2, 1981, pp. 297-299.
10.
Wolfe, Joseph, The Comparative Learning Effects of a Management Game vs. Casework in the Teaching of Business Policy, Academy of Management Proceedings, 33rd Annual Meeting, 1973, pp. 291-298.
11.
Wolfe, Joseph, A. ComparativeEvaluation of the Experiential Approach as a Business Policy Learning Environment , Academy of Management Journal, 18, 3 ( 1975), pp. 442-452.