In this narrative essay, we seek to reflect on the tensions of plural decolonial pedagogical projects in management education experiences at a business school. The experiences narrated were guided by the Pedagogy of the Little Bird (PLB), developed by the Xukuru people of Ororubá, Brasil. Some contributions of this work to management education in business schools are to highlight the significance of Indigenous pedagogies for designing more inclusive curricula, to present practical experiences guided by indigenous pedagogy and to recognise tensions in plural decolonial pedagogical projects, especially when in dialogue with modern institutions. In view of this, the text presents generative questions, so that they can take the debate forward in different contexts of business schools.
AbdallahC. (2024). Against mastery: Epistemic decolonizing in the margins of the Business School. Management Learning, 56(2), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076241236341
2.
AlcadipaniR.BerteroC. O. (2012). Guerra fria e ensino do management no Brasil: o caso da FGV-EASP [Cold War and teaching management in Brazil: The case of FGV-EAESP]. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 52(3), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1590/S003475902012000300002
3.
AmericaC.GrangeL. (2019). Dekolonisering van die kurrikulum: ʼn Kontekstualisering van Ekonomie- en Besigheidstudieonderrig [Decolonising the curriculum: Contextualising economics and business studies teaching]. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe, 59(1), 106–123. http://doi.org/10.17159/2224
4.
AraújoA. L. O. (2019). Reorganização social Xukuru do Ororubá e os desafios para uma agricultura e gestão territorial sustentáveis: Resistências e inovações socioambientais de um povo indígena no Nordeste do Brasil [Social reorganization Xukuru do Ororubá and the challenges for sustainable agriculture and territorial management: Resistances and socio-environmental] [thesis]. Universidad de Córdoba.
BanerjeeS. B. (2022). Decolonizing management theory: A critical perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 59(4), 1074–1087. http://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12756
7.
BarrosA. (2025). Putting management knowledge in perspective: Education as an ethical and political endeavor. Managing Learning, 56(1), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076241284246
CavalcantiM. F. R.SilvaA. L. (2024). Unveiling systemic oppression in business education: Freire’s contribution to our quest for social change. Management Learning, 55(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076231220121
12.
ColbourneR.MorozP.HallC.LendsayK. (2020). Indigenous works and two eyed seeing: Mapping the case for Indigenous-led research. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 15(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-04-2019-1754
DuarteM. F. (2020). “The one best way?” Repensando a difusão do management e seus impactos em decisões na carreira acadêmica em administração [The One Best Way”? Rethinking management diffusion and its impacts in decisions on academic career in the field]. Cadernos Ebape BR, 18(4), 877–890. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120190133
15.
EstevaG. (2010). Development. In SachsW. (Ed.), The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power (pp. 1–23). Zed Books.
16.
Fals BordaO. (2009). Cómo investigar la realidade para transformarla [How to investigate reality in order to transform it]. In Fals BordaO. (Ed.), Una sociologia sentipensante para América Latina [A sentipensante sociology for Latin America] (pp. 253–301). Clacso.
17.
FariaA. (2025). A decolonizing historicization of our pedagogy as a possibility for rehumanizing management education and educators. Journal of Management History, 31(3), 562–581. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-02-2025-0032
18.
FreireP. (2013). Pedagogia do Oprimido [Pedagogy of the oppressed]. Paz e Terra.
19.
GuelmanA.PalumboM. M. (2017). La construcción de pedagogías descolonizadoras: notas desde la práxis del trabajo em organizaciones Sociales [The construction of decolonizing pedagogies: Notes from work praxis in social organizations]. Revista Colombiana de Educación, (76), 33-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.17227/rce.num76-5929
20.
HaesbaertR. (2020). Do corpo-território ao território-corpo (da terra): contribuições decoloniais [From the Corpo-territory to the territory-body (of the earth): Decolonial contributions]. Geographia, 22(48), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.22409/GEOgraphia2020.v22i48.a43100
21.
Ibarra-ColadoE. (2006). Organization studies and epistemic coloniality in Latin America: Thinking otherness from the margins. Organization. 13(4), 463-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084060658
22.
ImasJ. M. (2023). Border struggle: Invisible [hi]story of the other in management/organization studies. In MahuyaP.CruzJ.MunshiD. (Eds.), Organizing at the margins: Theorizing organizations of struggle in the Global South (pp. 135–153). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22993-0
23.
JammulamadakaN.FariaA.JackG.RuggunanS. (2021). Decolonising management and organisational knowledge (MOK): Praxistical theorising for potential worlds. Organization, 28(5), 717–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211020463
24.
LimonadE. (2021). Por uma outra sustentabilidade: um diálogo entre Lefebvre e o pensamento decolonial [For another sustainability a dialogue between Lefebvre and decolonial thinking]. Boletim Goiano de Geografia, 1, e70787. https://doi.org/10.5216/BGG.v41.70787
MuzanenhamoP.ChowdhuryR. (2023). Epistemic injustice and the hegemonic ordeal in management and organization studies: Advancing Black scholarship. Organization Studies, 44(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211014802
30.
OrdônioI. N.FeitosaS. F. (2021). O bem viver e a agricultura de encantamento: reflexões breves sobre os modos de existência do povo Xukuru do Ororubá [The well-living and enchanted agriculture: brief reflections on the ways of existence of the Xukuru people of Ororubá]. In SilvaD. E.BarbalhoJ. I. S. (Eds.), Em defesa dos pobres: espiritualidade, justiça e libertação [In defense of the poor: spirituality, justice and freedom] (pp. 26–129). Edupe.
31.
RufinoL. (2019). Pedagogia das encruzilhadas [Pedagogy of the Crossroads]. Mórula Editorial.
32.
RuggunanS. D. (2016). Decolonising management studies: A love story. Acta Commercii, 16(2), 103–138. http://doi.org/10.4102/ac.v16i2.4127912/2019/v59n1a7
33.
SabinoG. F. T.PinheiroD. C. (2023). Precisamos falar sobre Taylor: indícios de racismo na administração científica? [We need to talk about Taylor: Evidence of racism in scientific management?] Cadernos Ebape.BR, 21(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120220065
34.
SantosA. B. (2015). Colonialismo, Quilombos: Modos e Significações [COLONIZATION, QUILOMBOS: Ways and meanings]. INCTI/UnB.
35.
SantosB. de S. (2017). Justicia entre saberes: Epistemologías del Sur contra el epistemicidio [Justice among knowledges: Epistemologies of the South against epistemicide]. Ediciones Morata.
36.
SantosB. de S. (2018). O fim do império cognitivo: a afirmação das Epistemologias do Sul [The end of the cognitive empire: The affirmation of southern epistemologies]. Edições Almedina.
37.
SantosB. de S. (2020). Descolonizar la universidad [Decolonizing the university]. In SantosB. de S.MenesesM. P., Conocimientos nacidos em las luchas: Construyendo las epistemologias del sur [Knowledge born in struggles: Building the epistemologies of the south] (pp. 501–539). Akal.
38.
SantosB.MenesesM. P. (2014). Epistemologias do Sul [Epistemologies of the South]. Cortez Editora.
39.
SantosB. S.CunhaT. (2022). Economias de bem viver: contra o desperdício das experiências [Economies of well-living. Against the waste of experiences» by Boaventura de Sousa Santos and Teresa Cunha]. Edições70.
40.
SantosE. C.SilvaÍ.LorêtoM. S. (2025). Grupo Vivências: Rehearsing resistance to abyssal thinking in business schools. Gender, Work & Organization, 32, 977–998. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13188
41.
SauerbronnF. F.LimaJ. P. R.FariaA. (2023). Decolonizando-recolonizando currículo em gestão e contabilidade [Decolonizing-recolonizing curriculum in management and accounting]. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 27(6), e230050. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2023230050.por
42.
SegatoR. (2012). Gênero e colonialidade: em busca de chaves de leitura e de um vocabulário estratégico descolonial [Gender and coloniality: In search of interpretive keys and a strategic decolonial vocabulary]. e-cadernos CES, 18, 106–131. https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.1533
43.
SuzinaA. C. (2020). English as lingua franca. Or the sterilisation of scientific work. Media, Culture & Society, 43(1), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720957906
VinceR.HibbertP. (2018). From the AMLE editorial team: Disciplined provocation: Writing essays for AMLE. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 17(4), 397–400. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2018.0245
46.
WalshC. (2013). Pedagogías decoloniales: Práticas insurgentes de resistir, (re)existir y (re)vivir [Decolonial pedagogies: Insurgent practices of resisting, (re)existing and (re)vivir]. Tomo I. Serie pensamiento decolonial. Ediciones Abya-Yala.
47.
WoodsC.DellK.CarrollB. (2022). Decolonizing the business school: Reconstructing the entrepreneurship classroom through indigenizing pedagogy and learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 21(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2020.0366
48.
WrightC.NybergD. (2016). Engaging with the contradictions of capitalism: Teaching “Sustainability” in the business school. In SteyaertC.BeyesT.ParkerM. (Eds.). The Routledge companion to reinventing management education (pp. 468–481). Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
