The Plagiarism Pandemic—Confronting Cheating in the Tech Era: Rejoinder to “The Next Generation of Pedagogy: Reflections from EdTech Leaders”

Abstract

This rejoinder extends the dialog initiated by Ritter et al. on Educational Technology (EdTech) by exploring its dual nature, framed through the Yin-Yang philosophy. While EdTech offers transformative opportunities for enhancing student engagement and learning, it also poses challenges, notably academic dishonesty fueled by Generative AI (GenAI) tools like ChatGPT and Google Gemini. The rejoinder examines the ethical and practical implications of these technologies, emphasizing the blurred lines between collaboration and plagiarism. It highlights strategies for educators, institutions, and policymakers to foster academic integrity while maximizing EdTech’s potential. This balanced approach ensures students develop both technological proficiency and ethical responsibility, preparing them for an increasingly digital academic and professional landscape.

Keywords

cheating academic integrity policies generative AI digital literacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbas

S. T.

(2024). Harmony in duality: Exploring the philosophical connections between Yin-Yang in Chinese thought and Dualism in western philosophy. Indonesian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Science and Technology, 2(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.55927/marcopolo.v2i2.7965

Anders

B. A.

(2023). Is using ChatGPT cheating, plagiarism, both, neither, or forward thinking? Patterns (N Y), 4(3), Article 100694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100694

Barnes

Hutson

(2024). Strategic integration of AI in higher education and industry: The AI8-point model. Advances in Social Sciences and Management, 2(6), 653. https://doi.org/10.63002/assm.26.520

Carpenter

D. D.

Harding

T. S.

Finelli

C. J.

Passow

H. J.

(2004). Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0027-3

Chiu

T. K. F.

(2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197

Connell

(2023). The influence of social media and contract cheating website use on the perception of academic integrity standards. https://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/5216

Cotton

D. R. E.

Cotton

P. A.

Shipway

J. R.

(2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Currie

G. M.

(2023). Academic integrity and artificial intelligence: Is ChatGPT hype, hero or heresy? Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 53(5), 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.04.008

Ercegovac

Richardson

J. V.

(2004). Academic dishonesty, plagiarism included, in the digital age: A literature review. College & Research Libraries, 65(4), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.65.4.301

10.

Fang

(2012). Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00221.x

11.

Guerrero-Dib

J. G.

Portales

Heredia-Escorza

(2020). Impact of academic integrity on workplace ethical behaviour. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 16(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-0051-3

12.

Hopster

(2021). What are socially disruptive technologies? Technology in Society, 67, Article 101750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101750

13.

Jones

D. L. R.

(2011). Academic dishonesty: Are more students cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569911404059

14.

Lancaster

Cotarlan

(2021). Contract cheating by STEM students through a file sharing website: A covid-19 pandemic perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00070-0

15.

Liu

H.-Y.

Maas

Danaher

Scarcella

Lexer

Van Rompaey

(2020). Artificial intelligence and legal disruption: A new model for analysis. Law, Innovation and Technology, 12(2), 205–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2020.1815402

16.

Mamo

Crompton

Burke

Nickel

(2024). Higher education faculty perceptions of ChatGPT and the influencing factors: A sentiment analysis of X. TechTrends, 68(3), 520–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00954-1

17.

Martino

(2024). Nevada’s students among most likely to cheat using AI. Retrieved June 24, 2024, from https://963kklz.com/2024/06/24/nevada-students-cheat-using-ai/

18.

McDonald

Johri

Ali

Hingle

(2024). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Evidence from an analysis of institutional policies and guidelines. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01659. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.01659

19.

Mossberger

Tolbert

C. J.

McNeal

R. S.

(2007). Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7428.001.0001

20.

Nam

(2023). 56% of college students have used ai on assignments or exams | BestColleges. https://www.bestcolleges.com/research/most-college-students-have-used-ai-survey/

21.

Nonis

Swift

C. O.

(2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320109599052

22.

Parks

R. F.

Lowry

P. B.

Wigand

R. T.

Agarwal

Williams

T. L.

(2018). Why students engage in cyber-cheating through a collective movement: A case of deviance and collusion. Computers & Education, 125, 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.003

23.

Pearson. (2018). The next generation of learners. https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/one-dot-com/one-dot-com/global/Files/news/news-annoucements/2018/The-Next-Generation-of-Learners_final.pdf

24.

Ratten

Jones

(2023). Generative artificial intelligence (ChatGPT): Implications for management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), Article 100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100857

25.

Rejeb

Appolloni

Treiblmaier

Iranmanesh

(2024). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT on education: A web mining and machine learning approach. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(1), Article 100932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100932

26.

Ritter

B. A.

Gopalkrishnan

S. S.

Sockbeson

C. E. S.

(2024). The next generation of pedagogy: Reflections from EdTech leaders. Journal of Management Education, 48(4), 610–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629231206182

27.

Ritter

B. A.

Small

E. E.

Mortimer

J. W.

Doll

J. L.

(2017). Designing management curriculum for workplace readiness: Developing students’ soft skills. Journal of Management Education, 42(1), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562917703679

28.

Rogers

E. M.

(1995). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.

29.

Rogerson

A. M.

(2022). The encouragement of file sharing behaviours through technology and social media: Impacts on student cheating behaviours and academic piracy. In Eaton

S. E.

Curtis

G. J.

Stoesz

B. M.

Clare

Rundle

Seeland

(Eds.), Contract cheating in higher education: Global perspectives on theory, practice, and policy (pp. 77–89). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12680-2_6

30.

Shwartz-Asher

Chun

Adam

N. R.

Snider

K. L. G.

(2020). Knowledge sharing behaviors in social media. Technology in Society, 63, Article 101426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101426

31.

Yen

(2019). #Retweet, #repost, and #regram? Ramifications of sharing content created by someone else on social media platforms. Carbon Law Group. https://carbonlg.com/retweet-repost-and-regram-ramifications-of-sharing-content-created-by-someone-else-on-social-media-platforms/

32.

Zouhaier

(2023). The impact of Artificial intelligence on higher education: An empirical study. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v10no1a17