Innovative instructional methods can help improve student engagement and learning outcomes when teaching difficult subjects, such as statistics. This instructional innovation article illustrates how gamification can be applied in management education to improve students’ learning experience, engagement, and acquisition of knowledge. Our purpose is to demonstrate how gamification is not only a powerful way to build on the use of games and game thinking in our field, but also a versatile application of education technology that could potentially enhance the way management knowledge is taught. Furthermore, it is a low-risk way for management educators to join and contribute to the larger virtual revolution. We document the process of combining the Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) competency framework and the Mechanics, Dynamics, and Aesthetics (MDA) design framework to create both theoretically and practically motivated gamification designs in a graduate-level statistics class. With student data and feedback, we demonstrate that gamification helped create a positive learning experience, facilitated interactions in the course, and assisted the learning of statistical knowledge. We offer suggestions and concrete examples for interested educators to implement gamification in their courses.
AlbertS.GrzedaM. (2015). Reflection in strategic management education. Journal of Management Education, 39(5), 650–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562914564872
2.
AldemirT.CelikB.KaplanG. (2018). A qualitative investigation of student perceptions of game elements in a gamified course. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.001
3.
AllenD. B.FukamiC. V.WittmerD. P. (2022). A course on the future of work: Building the scaffold while standing on it. Journal of Management Education, 46(1), 178–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920983839
4.
AllenS. J. (2020). On the cutting edge or the chopping block? Fostering a digital mindset and tech literacy in business management education. Journal of Management Education, 44(3), 362–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920903077
5.
AntonaciA.KlemkeR.SpechtM. (2019). The effects of gamification in online learning environments: A systematic literature review. Informatics, 6(3), 32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/informatics6030032
6.
ArmstrongM. B.LandersR. N. (2017). An evaluation of gamified training: Using narrative to improve reactions and learning. Simulation & Gaming, 48(4), 513–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878117703749
7.
AshaariN. S.JudiH. M.MohamedH.WookM. T. (2011). Student’s attitude towards statistics course. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.041
8.
AveryR. J.BryantW. K.MathiosA. (2006). Electronic course evaluations: Does an online delivery system influence student evaluations?Journal of Economic Education, 37(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.37.1.21-37
9.
BaiS.HewK. F.GondaD. E.HuangB.LiangX. (2022). Incorporating fantasy into gamification promotes student learning and quality of online interaction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00335-9
10.
BanduraA.WaltersR. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice-Hall.
11.
BettsJ. (2004). Theology, therapy or picket line? What’s the ‘good’ of reflective practice in management education?Reflective Practice, 5(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940410001691009
12.
CannonM. D.EdmondsonA. C. (2001). Confronting failure: Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.85
13.
ChenH.YinC.LiR.RongW.XiongZ.DavidB. (2019). Enhanced learning resource recommendation based on online learning style model. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 25(3), 348–356. https://doi.org.10.26599/TST.2019.9010014
14.
ChristyK. R.FoxJ. (2014). Leaderboards in a virtual classroom: A test of stereotype threat and social comparison explanations for women’s math performance. Computers & Education, 78, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.005
15.
ColomberoS.Dal ZottoP. (2022). Resource review. Moodle: A platform that enables gamification. Academy of Management Learning & Education. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2021.0453
DeterdingS. (2019). Gamification in management: Between choice architecture and humanistic design. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(2), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618790912
19.
DiasJ. (2017). Teaching operations research to undergraduate management students: The role of gamification. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.01.002
20.
EdmondsonA. C. (2011). Strategies for learning from failure. Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 48–55.
FiggC.Jaipal-JamaniK. (2015, March2). Investigating the development of TPACK knowledge through gamification. In RutledgeD.SlykhuisD. (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015—Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Las Vegas, NV, United States (pp. 3148–3156). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/150440/
23.
FiggC.Jaipal-JamaniK. (2018). Developing teacher knowledge about gamification as an instructional strategy. In I. Management Association (Ed.). Teacher training and professional development: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 1215–1243). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5631-2.ch056
24.
FolmarD. (2015). Game it up! Using gamification to incentivize your library (Vol. 7). Rowman & Littlefield.
25.
GibbonsB.FernandoM.SpeddingT. (2022). Innovation through developing a total enterprise computer simulation: Teaching responsible decision making. Journal of Management Education, 46(1), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920987591
26.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
27.
GoochD.VasalouA.BentonL.KhaledR. (2016, May7–12). Using gamification to motivate students with Dyslexia [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, United States (pp. 969–980). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858231
28.
HakulinenL.AuvinenT.KorhonenA. (2015). The effect of achievement badges on students’ behavior: An empirical study in a University-level computer science course. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 10(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v10i1.4221
29.
HamariJ.KoivistoJ.SarsaH. (2014, January6–9). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification [Conference session]. 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI, United States (pp. 3025–3034). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
30.
HibbertP. (2013). Approaching reflexivity through reflection: Issues for critical management education. Journal of Management Education, 37(6), 803–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562912467757
31.
HuangB.HewK. F. (2018). Implementing a theory-driven gamification model in higher education flipped courses: Effects on out-of-class activity completion and quality of artifacts. Computers & Education, 125, 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.018
32.
HuangB.HewK. F. (2021). Using gamification to design courses: Lessons learned in a three-year design-based study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 44–63. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26977856
33.
HunickeR.LeBlancM.ZubekR. (2004). MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, 4(1), 1722.
KauppinenA.ChoudharyA. I. (2021). Gamification in entrepreneurship education: A concrete application of Kahoot!The International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100563
36.
KeelerA. (2014). Beyond the worksheet: Playsheets, GBL, and gamification. Edutopia, p. 1–3.
37.
KnutasA.IkonenJ.NikulaU.PorrasJ. (2014, June27–28). Increasing collaborative communications in a programming course with gamification: A case study [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, Ruse, Bulgaria (pp. 370–377). https://doi.org/10.1145/2659532.2659620
38.
KoehlerM.MishraP. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
39.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
40.
KolbD. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT Press.
41.
KolbD. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson.
42.
KolbA. Y.KolbD. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
43.
KolbA. Y.KolbD. A. (2009). On becoming a learner: The concept of learning identity. In Bamford-ReesD.DoyleB.Klein-CollinsB.WertheimJ. (Eds.), Learning never ends: Essays on adult learning inspired by the life and work of David O. Justice (pp. 5–13). CAEL Forum and News.
44.
KrauseM.MogalleM.PohlH.WilliamsJ. J. (2015, March14–18). A playful game changer: Fostering student retention in online education with social gamification [Conference session]. Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, Vancouver, BC, Canada (pp. 95–102). https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724665
45.
LandersR. N. (2014). Developing a theory of gamified learning: Linking serious games and gamification of learning. Simulation & Gaming, 45(6), 752–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114563660
46.
LandersR. N. (2019). Gamification misunderstood: How badly executed and rhetorical gamification obscures its transformative potential. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(2), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618790913
47.
LandersR. N.AuerE. M.CollmusA. B.ArmstrongM. B. (2018). Gamification science, its history and future: Definitions and a research agenda. Simulation & Gaming, 49(3), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878118774385
48.
LandersR. N.LandersA. K. (2014). An empirical test of the theory of gamified learning: The effect of leaderboards on time-on-task and academic performance. Simulation & Gaming, 45(6), 769–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114563662
49.
MazarakisA. (2015). Using gamification for technology enhanced learning: The case of feedback mechanisms. Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 17(4), 6–9.
50.
MichaelD. R.ChenS. L. (2005). Serious games: Games that educate, train, and inform. Muska & Lipman/Premier-Trade.
51.
MishraP.KoehlerM. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
52.
MorschheuserB.HamariJ.KoivistoJ.MaedcheA. (2017). Gamified crowdsourcing: Conceptualization, literature review, and future agenda. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 106, 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.04.005
53.
O’ConnorC.JoffeH. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
54.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.SeamanM. A. (1995). The effect of time constraints and statistics test anxiety on test performance in a statistics course. The Journal of Experimental Education, 63(2), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1995.9943816
55.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.SlateJ. R.PatersonF. R.WatsonM. H.SchwartzR. A. (2000). Factors associated with achievement in educational research courses. Research in the Schools, 7(1), 53–65.
56.
PanW.TangM. (2004). Examining the effectiveness of innovative instructional methods on reducing statistics anxiety for graduate students in the social sciences. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(2), 149–159.
57.
PanaderoE.BrownG. T.StrijbosJ. W. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 803–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2
58.
PavlovichK.CollinsE.JonesG. (2009). Developing students’ skills in reflective practice: Design and assessment. Journal of Management Education, 33(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562907307640
59.
PrabawaH. W. (2017). A review of gamification in technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1), 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012019
60.
RedpathL. (2012). Confronting the bias against on-line learning in management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(1), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0044
61.
SchöbelS. M.JansonA.LeimeisterJ. M. (2022). Gamifying online training in management education to support emotional engagement and problem-solving skills. Journal of Management Education, 47(2), 166–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629221123287
62.
SchöbelS.SaqrM.JansonA. (2021). Two decades of game concepts in digital learning environments: A bibliometric study and research agenda. Computers & Education, 173, 104296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104296
63.
SimõesJ.RedondoR. D.VilasA. F. (2013). A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.007
64.
SitzmannT.ElyK.BrownK. G.BauerK. N. (2010). Self-assessment of knowledge: A cognitive learning or affective measure?Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.2.zqr169
65.
TenórioT.BittencourtI. I.IsotaniS.PedroA.OspinaP. (2016). A gamified peer assessment model for on-line learning environments in a competitive context. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.049
66.
TownsendM. A. R.MooreD. W.TuckB. F.WiltonK. M. (1998). Self-concept and anxiety in university students studying social science statistics within a co-operative learning structure. Educational Psychology, 18(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341980180103
67.
TrinhM. P. (2019). Learning identity, flexibility, and lifelong experiential learning. In AldagJ. (Ed.), Oxford Research encyclopedia of business and management. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.187
68.
TrinhM. P. (2022a). Can you escape? Using mobile app escape games to create a holistic experiential learning process online. Management Teaching Review, 7(3), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/23792981211056921
TrinhM. P.KolbD. A. (2012). Eastern experiential learning: Eastern principles for learning wholeness. Career Planning and Adult Development Journal, 27(4), 29–43.
71.
TrinhM. P.van EschC.MartinezH. A.MesserT. (2021). Appreciating large classes: Using Appreciative Inquiry to foster a hospitable learning space for experiential learning. Journal of Management Education, 45(5), 786–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920980125
72.
UtomoA. Y.SantosoH. B. (2015, April8–10). Development of gamification-enriched pedagogical agent for e-Learning system based on community of inquiry [Conference session]. Proceedings of the International HCI and UX Conference in Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia (pp. 1–9). https://doi.org/10.1145/2742032.2742033
73.
VesaM.HarviainenJ. T. (2019). Gamification: Concepts, consequences, and critiques. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(2), 128–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618790911
74.
VygotskyL. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34–41.
75.
WanickV.BuiH. (2019). Gamification in management: A systematic review and research directions. International Journal of Serious Games, 6(2), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v6i2.282
76.
WeinzimmerL. G.EskenC. A. (2017). Learning from mistakes: How mistake tolerance positively affects organizational learning and performance. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 53(3), 322–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886316688658
77.
YanZ.BrownG. T. (2017). A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1247–1262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091
78.
ZimmermanB. J.MoylanA. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In Dalam HackerD. J. (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 311–328). Routledge.
