Republication of “Lessons From the Best and Worst Student Team Experiences: How a Teacher Can Make the Difference”

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albanese

Van Fleet

D. D.

(1985). Rational behavior in groups: The free-riding tendency. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 244-255.

Bacon

D. R.

Stewart

K. A.

Stewart-Belle

(1998). Exploring predictors of student team project performance. Journal of Marketing Education, 20(1), 63-71.

Baldwin

T. T.

Bedell

M. D.

Johnson

J. L.

(1997). The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1369-1397.

Bettenhausen

K. L.

(1991, June). Five years of group research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 345-381.

Burningham

West

M. A.

(1995). Individual, climate, and group interaction processes as predictors of work team innovation. Small Group Research, 26(1), 106-117.

Clark

G. L.

(1989, Fall). Peer evaluations: An empirical test of their validity and reliability. Journal of Marketing Education, 11, 41-58.

Cohen

A. R.

(1993). The portable MBA in management. New York: Wiley.

Cohen

(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.

Comer

D. R.

(1995). A model of social loafing in real work groups. Human Relations, 48(6), 647-667.

10.

Cook

R.W.

(1981). An investigation of student peer evaluation on group project performance. Journal of Marketing Education, 3(1), 50-52.

11.

Decker

(1995). Management team formation for large scale simulations. In Overby

J. D.

Patz

A. L.

(Eds.), Developments in business simulation & experiential exercises (22) (pp. 128-129). Statesboro, GA: Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning.

12.

Eden

(1985). Team development: A true field experiment at three levels of rigor. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(1), 94-100.

13.

Fisher

C. D.

Shaw

J. B.

Ryder

(1994). Problems in project groups: An anticipatory case study. Journal of Management Education, 18(3), 351-355.

14.

Fowler

(1995). How to build effective teams. People Management, 1(4), 40-41.

15.

French

W. L.

Bell

C. H.

(1994). Organizational development: Behavioral science interventions for organizational improvement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

16.

Gentry

J. W.

(1980). Group size and attitudes toward the simulation experience. Simulation & Games, 11(4), 451-459.

17.

Gersick

C.J.G.

(1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 274-309.

18.

Gosenpud

J. J.

Washbush

J. B.

(1991). Predicting simulation performance: Differences between individuals and groups. In Wheatley

W. J.

Gosenpud

(Eds.), Developments in business simulation & experiential exercises (18) (pp. 44-48). Stillwater, OK: Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning.

19.

Hackman

J. R.

(Ed.) (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

20.

Harkins

S. G.

Jackson

J. M.

(1985). The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(4), 457-465.

21.

Harrison

Cooper

C. L.

(1976). The use of groups in education. Small Group Behavior, 7(3), 259-270.

22.

Ingham

A. G.

Levinger

Graves

Peckham

(1974). The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 371-384.

23.

Jaffe

E. D.

Nebenzahl

I. D.

(1990). Group interaction and business game performance. Simulation & Gaming, 21(2), 133-146.

24.

Jalajas

D. S.

Sutton

R. I.

(1984-1985). Feuds in student groups, coping with whiners, martyrs, saboteurs, bullies, and deadbeats. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 9(4), 217-227.

25.

Janus

I. L.

(1982). Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

26.

Jones

D.W.

(1996). Empowered teams in the classroom can work. Journal for Quality and Participation, 19, 80-87.

27.

Katz

(1982). The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(1), 81-104.

28.

Katzenbach

J. R.

Smith

D. K.

(1993). The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 111-120.

29.

Kerr

N. L.

(1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 819-828.

30.

Kerr

N. L.

Bruun

S. E.

(1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 78-94.

31.

Kirk

R. E.

(1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

32.

Krayer

K. J.

(1988). Exploring group maturity in the classroom. Small Group Behavior, 19(2), 259-272.

33.

Latané

Williams

Harkins

(1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822-832.

34.

Lerner

L. D.

(1995). Making student groups work. Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 123-125.

35.

LeRosen

R. G.

(1976, April). Group projects, peer rating scales: Management education tools. Journal of Business Education, 317-318.

36.

Mello

J. A.

(1993). Improving individual member accountability in small work group settings. Journal of Management Education, 17(2), 253-259.

37.

Mesch

D. J.

(1991). The jigsaw technique: A way to establish individual accountability in group work. Journal of Management Education, 15(3), 355-358.

38.

Michaelsen

L. K.

(1991). From the editor. Journal of Management Education, 15(3), 275.

39.

Quirk

(1989, Spring). A procedure designed to assist students to improve their presentation skills as part of a marketing planning team. Journal of Marketing Education, 11, 40-44.

40.

Rentsch

J. R.

Heffner

T. S.

Duffy

L. T.

(1994). What you know is what you get from experience: Team experience related to teamwork schemas. Group & Organization Management, 19, 450-475.

41.

Rollier

(1992). Observations of a corporate facilitator. Simulation & Gaming, 23(4), 442-456.

42.

Rosenbaum

M. E.

Moore

D. I.

Cotton

J. L.

Cook

M. S.

Hieser

R. A.

Shovar

M. N.

Gray

M. J.

(1980). Group productivity and process: Pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 626-642.

43.

Schultz

Anderson

(1984). Training in the management of conflict. Small Group Behavior, 15(3), 333-348.

44.

Steers

R. M.

Porter

L. W.

(1991). Motivation and work behavior (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

45.

Strong

J. T.

Anderson

R. E.

(1990, Summer). Free-riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and preliminary data. Journal of Marketing Education, 12, 61-67.

46.

Tuckman

B. W.

(1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-389.

47.

Vora

J. A.

Akula

W. G.

(1978). Peer and self assessments in small groups. Small Group Behavior, 9(3), 427-434.

48.

Wageman

(1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 145-180.

49.

Williams

D. L.

Beard

J. D.

Rymer

(1991, Summer). Team projects: Achieving their full potential. Journal of Marketing Education, 13, 45-53.

50.

Witteman

(1991). Group member satisfaction. Small Group Research, 22(1), 24-58.

51.

Wolfe

Box

T. M.

(1988). Team cohesion effects on business game performance. Simulation & Games, 19(1), 82-98.

52.

Wolfe

Chacko

T. I.

(1983). Team-size effects on business game performance and decision-making behaviors. Decision Sciences, 14, 121-133.

53.

Zemke

(1993). Rethinking the rush to team up. Training, 30(11), 55-61.