AdlerP. S. (2016). 2015Presidential address: Our teaching mission. Academy of Management Review, 41, 185-195.
2.
ArbaughJ. B. (2016). Where are the dedicated scholars of management learning and education?Management Learning, 47, 230-240.
3.
ArbaughJ. B.FornaciariC. J.HwangA. (2016). Identifying research topic development in business and management education research using legitimation code theory. Journal of Management Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1052562916631109
4.
BellE.KothiyalN.WillmottH. (in press). Methodology-as-technique and the meaning of rigor in management research. British Journal of Management.
5.
BellE.WillmottH. (2014). Editor’s introduction: Qualitative research: Themes and prospects. In BellE.WillmottH. (Eds.), Major works in qualitative research in business and management (pp. 21-54). London, England: Sage.
6.
BridgmanT.CummingsS.McLaughlinC. (2015). The case method as invented tradition. Revisiting Harvard’s history to reorient management education. In HumphreysJ. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 75th annual meeting of the Academy of Management (pp. 7-11). doi:10.5465/AMBPP.2015.24
7.
CummingsS.BridgmanT.BrownK. (2016). Unfreezing change as three steps: Rethinking Kurt Lewin’s legacy for change management. Human Relations, 69(1), 33-60.
8.
CurrieR. R.PandherG. S. (2013). Management education journals’ rank and tier by active scholars. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12, 194-218.
9.
DavenportE.SnyderE. (1995). Who cites women? Whom do women cite? An exploration of gender and scholarly citation in sociology. Journal of Documentation, 51, 404-410.
10.
GibbonsM.CamilleL.HelgaN.SimonS.PeterS.MartinT. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London, England: Sage.
11.
GreyC. (2009). License to think. Management Learning, 40, 353-356.
LewinK. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; equilibrium and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5-41
14.
MaliniakD.PowersR.WalterB. F. (2013). The gender citation gap in international relations. International Organization, 67, 889-922.
15.
MingersJ.WillmottH. (2013). Taylorizing business school research: On the “one best way” performative effects of journal ranking lists. Human Relations, 66, 1051-1073.
16.
MurphyJ.ZhuJ. (2012). Neo-colonialism in the academy? Anglo-American domination in management journals. Organization, 19, 915-927.
17.
RynesS. L.BrownK. G. (2011). Where are we in the “long march to legitimacy?” Assessing scholarship in management learning and education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 561-582.
18.
ThomasR.DaviesA. (2002). Gender and new public management: Reconstituting academic subjectivities. Gender, Work & Organization, 19, 372-397.
19.
WilhiteA. W.FongE. A. (2012). Coercive citation in academic publishing. Science Magazine, 335, 542-543.